Claremont School Board — August 19, 2026

Regular meeting summary generated from the meeting video transcript and the posted agenda. Centerpieces: the treasurer's report of two August payments issued with no board or treasurer signature, the board's first-ever audit corrective action (procurement thresholds, adopted unanimously), and a dress-code proposal defeated 2–4. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, August 19, 2026
Start time
6:30 p.m. scheduled; nonpublic session moved at 3:16:15 into the recording (about 9:47 p.m., against an 8:10 p.m. slot on the agenda). No public adjournment appears on the recording.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Claremont NH (audio broadcast on CCTV Channel 8)
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Board 8/19/26 (3:17:18 — ends in crosstalk seconds after the nonpublic roll call)
Minutes
None located in the district's public shares as of 2026-08-25 (both the 2026 and 2027 Meeting Minutes folders checked, plus a Drive search). The five-business-day clock under RSA 91-A:2, II runs to August 26, so the minutes were not yet due when this page was generated.

Participants

Board, administration and guests. No minutes have been posted for this meeting, so name spellings follow the posted agenda; the automatic transcript's renderings are noted where they differ.
NameRoleParticipation
Candace CrawfordChair; Finance Subcommittee ChairPresided; reported the August 12 finance subcommittee meeting; took responsibility for four policies missing from the agenda
Michael PetrinVice Chair; SRVRTC Committee ChairPresent; reported the August 10 tech-center committee meeting (3:11:05)
Heather WhitneyBoard member; Ad Hoc Reconfiguration Chair; Finance SubcommitteePresent; moved the bus-quote authorization and the police antenna; line-by-line critique of the dress-code language; raised the FY28 aid warning
William "Bill" MaddenBoard member; Capital Improvement ChairPresent; pressed on manifest access, auditor independence, and dress-code enforcement; voted against the dress code
Loren HowardBoard member; Policy Subcommittee ChairPresent; policy report (six or seven policies for September 2); voted against the dress code
Donald "Don" LavaletteBoard member; Policy and Finance SubcommitteesPresent; moved adoption of the procurement corrective action; seconded the dress-code motion
Brian RappBoard member; Capital Improvement and Policy SubcommitteesPresent; moved adoption of the dress code; raised petty cash and proprietary fire-alarm procurement; backed continuing the forensic audit
Dr. Tim BroadrickSuperintendent, SAU 6 (acting as his own business administrator and special education director)Read the Richmond recognition; finance, transportation, facilities, grants, special education and personnel reports (transcript renders the name "Broderick")
Kerry KennedyDirector of Curriculum, Instruction & AssessmentRead the roll call in the clerk's absence; new-staff orientation, summer programs and enrollment report
Luke DiamondSchool District Treasurer (Ward 3)July 2026 treasurer's report; identified two unsigned August payments; asked for the forensic-audit firm to be named in the August 5 minutes
Nicole BoyntonPrincipal, Claremont Middle SchoolPresented the joint SHS/CMS dress-code proposal in Dr. Herrington's absence; gave middle-school staffing counts
Noelle KronbergSchool Board ClerkAbsent (ill); the roll call was read by Kerry Kennedy at the chair's request
Dr. Michael HerringtonPrincipal, Stevens High SchoolAbsent (family emergency); wrote the Michael Richmond recognition, which the superintendent read aloud; answered a program-space question by text during the meeting
Michelle HerringtonAssistant Director, Sugar River Valley Regional Technical CenterAbsent (family emergency); her tech-center hiring update was relayed in the SRVRTC committee report
Citizens' commentsNo member of the public offered comment; the chair called for comments at 0:08:32 and recorded none

Agenda

From the posted agenda (CSB Agenda DRAFT - August 19 2026), which was the only document in the meeting's Drive packet folder — the supporting documents were reachable only as links inside the agenda itself. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped entry for full text.

Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:04I. Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance"6:30 PM Call to Order & Pledge of Allegiance." The chair called the meeting to order "for August 19th" and led the Pledge.
0:00:37II. Roll call of attendance"Secretary Roll Call of Attendance of Board Members." The clerk was out sick, so Kerry Kennedy read the roll at the chair's request. All seven members answered: Howard, Lavalette, Rapp, Madden, Whitney, Petrin (whose name the automatic transcript swallowed, leaving a bare "here") and Crawford.
0:01:21Recognition — Michael F. Richmond, 1962–2026Scheduled for SHS Principal Dr. Michael Herrington, who was called away by a family emergency; the superintendent read Dr. Herrington's text: "The loss of Mike Richmond leaves a profound void in the halls, classrooms and the city of Claremont." A 1980 Stevens graduate, Cornell alumnus and Army veteran, "a truly exceptional math teacher, patient, compassionate, and deeply connected to his students."
0:03:45Consent agenda — agenda amendments; August 5 draft minutes; review of manifestsThe treasurer asked that the August 5 minutes name the forensic-audit firm where they say only that the check "has not been cash[ed]," and that the finance director's name (Gonyea) be corrected; the chair accepted the corrections without a recorded vote. Manifests since August 5 were circulated in a binder as already-processed copies.
0:08:32Citizens' comments (Policy BEDH)"Do we have any citizens who would like to make a comment tonight?" — none offered.
0:08:49III.1 Treasurer's report — Luke DiamondThree attachments on the agenda (Treas-July2026, Treas-July2026TR, Treas-Aug2026). July payments totalling $2,977,682.46; items in red lacked vouchers; two August payments flagged in purple as "issued without board or treasurer" signature. No board action.
0:22:43III.2 Curriculum, Instruction & Assessment report — Kerry KennedyOver 35 new staff welcomed August 20–21 at Claremont Savings Bank; 24-plus mentors; bus tour of the city; convocation August 27; students return August 31, kindergarten September 9 (after the September 8 voting day). Enrollment 1,359 district-wide as of two days before the meeting. Summer boost, extended school year and credit-recovery staff named individually.
0:35:14III.3 Finance report — FY26 budget v. actual; DOE-25 year-end reporting; FY27 revenue planningRoughly half a million dollars of stale encumbrances closed out, some tied to the closed Bluff School; the report's "nearly $5 million of surplus" expressly disclaimed as a year-end position with a large payables run still to process, including two-thirds of an $800,000-plus SchoolCare assessment. FY25 year-end reports must still be filed for Claremont and Unity. Adequacy payments 20% September 1, 20% November 1, 30% January 1, 30% April 1.
1:06:02III.4 Superintendent's report — audit corrective action; transportation; facilities; grants; special ed aid; SAP; CCTV room; hiringEight sub-items. The procurement corrective action was taken up here and then acted on as discussion item 2; transportation (bus replacement, routes), facilities (nine of 27 summer projects incomplete), grant reporting, Medicaid and special-education aid data, the SAP grant, the 1999 CCTV room lease, and hiring followed.
1:56:28V.1 SHS & CMS Dress Code Proposal — discussion & actionThree documents: the 2005 dress-code policy, a description of last year's interpretation, and proposed common language for both schools. Rapp moved adoption at 2:15:00, Lavalette seconded. Motion failed 2–4; the chair said she would have voted in favor "but it's a moot point." Returned to administration for revision, to come back with the student handbooks on September 2.
1:10:36V.2 Proposed audit corrective action — procurement & purchasing policies and proceduresTaken up out of order, during the superintendent's report, on the chair's invitation. Lavalette moved adoption, Whitney seconded, and the board adopted it unanimously at 1:18:05 — the district's first adopted corrective action in response to the FY22 audit. Policy alignment referred to the policy subcommittee.
2:32:44V.3 "Recovery Plan" update — discussionA SWOT analysis with principals, about half done across nine areas of operations, to be merged with the board's goal-setting output and then taken to the community — by survey rather than a standing committee, after Madden recounted a Superintendents Advisory Committee that "went nowhere."
2:43:46V.4 Special education staffing & operations — information & discussionConceptual 2026-27 plan splitting special educators into a core evaluation team, a case-management team, and specially-designed-instruction teachers who stay with students. Prompted partly by a caseload of about 75 on one teacher last year. Information only; no vote.
2:50:37V.5 Special education DDR & program approvals by NHED — information & discussionA Department of Education due diligence review, running for several months, originating with the former "Academy" program and widening to every substantially separate program. Eleven programs were approved in September 2024; none were approved last year. Approvals to be filed "by the end of next week"; two Stevens programs — an approved emotional-disturbance program and a non-special-education alternative pathway — to be described in a letter to families.
3:02:14V.6 Police Department request to place antenna at CMS — discussion & actionWhitney moved to allow the antenna "per the memorandum provided to the board and any further review that the superintendent feels necessary"; described as a repeater strengthening emergency-service radio at that end of town. Carried unanimously at 3:03:08.
3:03:28V.7 Personnel report — nominations, resignations, SAU organizational chart, job descriptionsNominations approved unanimously at 3:05:42, including three certified special educators and an out-of-district coordinator (Brianne Edmonds). Resignation: Alison Campbell, returning CMS music teacher, notified the district the previous Saturday. Org chart shows two central-office vacancies — business administrator and special education director. Draft job descriptions for Director of Athletics and Director of Information Technology presented for information.
3:11:05V.8 Subcommittee reportsSRVRTC (Petrin): August 10 meeting; machine tool, work-based learning coordinator, medical assistant and HVAC/plumbing teachers all hired and ready to start, one other since resigned. Ad Hoc Reconfiguration (Whitney): summer hiatus, reconvening this fall. Capital Improvement (Madden): asked for a mid-September meeting on the missing five-year capital plan. Finance (Crawford): met August 12, next meeting September 15. Policy (Howard): four policies missed tonight's agenda; six or seven expected September 2.
3:14:49VI. Other businessThe chair accepted responsibility for the policies not reaching the agenda. Whitney raised the assignment of officers and roles from March, which the chair deferred to nonpublic. Madden asked to keep board visits to the schools as a future agenda item. Howard announced the Back to School festival, Saturday August 22, ten to noon at Barnes Park.
3:16:15VII. Nonpublic session — RSA 91-A:3, II (a, c & e)Agenda purposes: "Personnel" and "Negotiations Planning - SREA, Custodians, Secretaries, CAA." The chair moved to enter nonpublic "under RSA 91 a three part two A, C and E," a second followed, and a roll call was taken at 3:16:40 — audible as seven affirmative responses. The recording ends moments later; no return to public session is on tape.
8:30 p.m.VIII–IX. Future dates; adjournmentScheduled but not reached in the public portion of the recording. The agenda lists September 2 (adult education status, board by-laws feedback, student/parent, staff and athletics handbooks, field use agreement) and September 16 as the next regular meetings.

Discussion timeline

Times are from the dialogue transcript (Output/Dialogue/Claremont School Board 81926.mp4.CSV). Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording. Quotations reproduce the automatic transcript as spoken; bracketed text marks a correction of a transcription error.

TimeTopicWhat was said (leading text; hover/focus for more)Flags
0:01:21Recognition: Michael F. RichmondBroadrick, reading Dr. Herrington's words after a family emergency kept both Herringtons away: "I, I did not know Mike Richmond, obviously, and I apologize for that. And yet I respect anybody who devotes their professional life to to serving public schools and serving kids." The tribute describes a 1980 Stevens graduate, Cornell alumnus and Army veteran, American Legion leader and math teacher who "had an extraordinary gift for reaching the most reserved kids."
0:03:45Minutes corrections: name the forensic-audit firm"Forensic audit signed in May. I'd like to have the name of the firm placed into the minutes where it says. It just says has not been cash[ed]." The same speaker asked that the finance director's name be corrected and offered to send the changes to the clerk. The chair accepted them and moved on without a recorded vote on the minutes.OBSERVATION
0:05:44Manifests: can the board see them before the checks go out?Madden: "How will we see them before you [issue] the checks? Can we see them, or are we going to be doing this imminently, electronically?" Broadrick's answer: the goal is electronic manifests "by the end of September"; until then, "apparently the same way you have been for the last ten months" — the office calls around until two available members sign, "and you may never be aware of this happening because we need two signatures before the treasurer can come in and sign checks." Madden: "I don't remember the voucher being attached… I'd like to see these when we ask for two volunteers to run down there."MEDIUM
0:07:24Chair explains how signers were chosenCrawford: "I'll take the responsibility. Doctor Broderick called me Monday… And said I need two people from the board… I think that Brian Rap[p] and Don Love[lette] were in town and available. So I called them because I got two. I stopped calling and didn't call everyone." A member added that under the previous business administrator vouchers were emailed the Friday before, "so we'd see them beforehand" — a practice Broadrick confirmed has "stopped happening."MEDIUM
0:09:19Treasurer's report: the mechanicsDiamond walked through the checking and sweep accounts ("each day the checking account closes at 50,000"), then: "Under deposits, I'm still not in the loop when it comes to deposits… the treasurer is actually supposed to be in the loop for that. And at the very least, I mean, I'm willing to walk them over to the bank, but I'm also I'd also be satisfied with just a list or being notified of paper checks and where they come from, because the treasurer is supposed to account for where all money comes from and where all it where it all goes."POSITIVE
0:11:23Outstanding checks and the July total"Just because you know, the balance in your bank, it doesn't mean you have that available to spend." July payments total $2,977,682.46, tying to the month's payments line; items still in red are those "I do not yet have vouchers for," with a stack waiting at the district office.
0:14:14Direct deposits arriving as one lump sum"The direct deposits are not being itemized. They're just showing as one big lump." Diamond wants each direct-deposit item on the manifest the board signs: "it doesn't make much sense to say, oh, I see $640,000. Okay. And you sign it." He noted the previous business administrator "was putting the payroll stuff on the manifest after the fact."MEDIUM
0:15:45Two August payments issued with no signature"Two payments went in that were not signed. I found the vouchers. They were, but nobody signed them, so they were just put in." Under questioning from the chair, Diamond identified them as the school district payroll and the "Iris [IRS] USA tax payment" of August 6, marked in purple on his report as "Payment issued without board or treasurer" signature: "Neither of those were signed… by anyone. So anyway, that's that's kind of a practice that we're hoping to get away from. That was cited in, in our audit."HIGH
0:17:01Chair proposes monthly summaries insteadCrawford suggested a monthly summary "instead of doing this on a daily basis." Diamond agreed that is where he wants to get to, but explained why he is still itemizing: "There shouldn't be such entries. The treasurer should always sign for every payment that goes out… And so the fact that the reason I'm still itemizing them is because they're still there." He added that the detail is not otherwise "available to the public, and they should be."HIGH POSITIVE
0:19:04What is blocking a working systemWhitney: "What are the barriers that you see right now to getting a system in place? I know that we're very short staffed in the D[O], and my understanding is that you're communicating these concerns to Doctor Broderick… I don't have a business administrator." Diamond: "I think those probably are some of the biggest stumbling ba[locks]… Oh, yes. Things are definitely improving… everybody is on board now that this is how we should be doing it. Just we're not quite doing it yet."
0:19:59The audit finding about back-signed vouchers is being deletedMadden asked about the auditor's account of postdated vouchers. Broadrick: "I called Mike about that. I think that was in the fiscal 22 audit report… They were repeating something that they had been told from within the SA[U], not something that they had seen documented. So because that report is still draft, he's deleting the line… It doesn't mean it didn't happen. It means that that line in the audit report was based on what they had heard, as opposed to what they had seen and had evidence to support."OBSERVATION
0:20:48Forgery concern referred to the forensic auditorsMadden: "It's my understanding to a man and woman that no board members ever signed [vouchers] in the past until Matt Angel[l] came here. That's something that's got to be looked at." Whitney: "my concern was, is that there was fraudulent or forgery occurring… because it was cited in the audit that they were signed retroactively or after the check was issued. And I know… that nobody ever signed those vouchers. So that was my concern from a forensic audit position… because that's forgery. Of board members signatures."OBSERVATION
0:22:43New-staff orientation and the school calendarKennedy: over 35 new staff welcomed the next morning at Claremont Savings Bank, 24-plus mentors, a bus tour of the city led by driver Ray Peck. Convocation August 27; students return August 31; kindergarten September 9 because of the September 8 voting day. She read out every summer boost, extended-school-year, tutoring and credit-recovery staff member by name.
0:29:24Enrollment: 1,359 students"We are right now at 1359 students total in the district. And that was as of two days ago." Asked how that compares with prior years, Kennedy said pre-K is up, Maple is down one student against a changed grade configuration, the middle school up three, the high school down one, and undertook to bring the multi-year baseline Whitney asked for to the next meeting.
0:31:05Curriculum time for new teachers; Great Minds costs unknownLavalette: "Where is the time for curriculum introduction and acclimation for new teachers? That's the thing that worries me about young teachers, and we tend to pack their days full." On the curriculum program's cost, Kennedy said the vendor (Great Minds) is still preparing quotes split between grant and district funding; pressed by Madden — "why would information from the vendor be affected by whether it's a grant or or budget" — she said the total is not known yet.
0:35:59Half a million in stale encumbrances closed"It was almost half $1 million. So that's that's money that was encumbered in last year's budget but never actually spent… when you closed a school, there were some encumbrances associated with bluff that stayed in the budget until we just closed them." Broadrick expressly refused to treat the resulting figure as a surplus: "the number on your report is nearly $5 million of surplus. And that is not going to be our end of year position for fiscal 26," with a large payables run still to process — including two-thirds of an $800,000-plus SchoolCare assessment the former business administrator had paid only in part.OBSERVATION
0:39:34Why the audits still matter — "zero corrective actions"Madden: "I don't understand why if we're at a point where we're getting so accurate, we're not going to close the the audits until November. I think we're spending a lot of time on this issue. I'd rather see it spent on improving the quality of the school rather than counting beans." Broadrick: FY24 must be finished before FY25, and FY25 before FY26; "as of right now, zero corrective actions have been adopted by the board, and zero corrective action work officially has been undertaken by the SA[U]."HIGH
0:43:10Board member questions the auditor's independenceMadden: "I have a problem with the guy who is here for nine years and didn't catch the 5 or $10 million bust, so I'm not sure we have the right consultant." He described a general pattern — "you want to find enough that you show you doing work, but you don't want to get to aggressive and spoil your relationship with the administration" — while saying "I didn't say him." Crawford: "An auditor is supposed to be an independent party." Whitney noted the firm has been engaged since 2019 and that turnover and missing records drew the work out. Lavalette: "short of indicting somebody for fraud, the auditors would be at the very bottom of my list."OBSERVATION
0:50:09Year-end reporting for two districts, from an uncertain starting pointBroadrick is working with the auditor and Unity's superintendent because the separation agreement makes Claremont responsible for both districts' FY25 filings. "We don't have a good starting point. We're not going to have 100% solid ending point. Because remember, fiscal 26 started with Matt Angel[l]'s best guess… typically we sign [an attestation] that these are accurate to the best of our knowledge. And in this case, we know these are our best guesses."HIGH
0:51:32Tuition agreements missing; rate frozen since FY23"It's difficult to find those written documents. My best luck has come by asking other school districts to send them to me. The initial evidence I have is that the base tuition rate hasn't been increased to reflect inflation or any other budget increases since 2223." He also reported that five years of special-education aid data required tracking down submissions by three different employees — "finding one of them took a lot of running around in the basement."OBSERVATION
0:52:49Four weeks to close the yearReceivables still open include tuition invoices, Medicaid reimbursement and special-education aid: "we need that data in order to close out the year… so we've got about four weeks." FY27 adequacy numbers exist but are embargoed until September 1, and the first FY28 estimate arrives around November — the year Whitney warned about, after the former business administrator predicted a seven-figure aid loss heading into collective bargaining.HIGH
1:02:37Free and reduced lunch forms drive differentiated aidCrawford: the applications "hav[e] a direct impact on how much we receive in differentiated aid." Broadrick added that a higher federal income threshold this year excludes some families who previously qualified, which "reduces differentiated aid" as well as raising what families pay. Madden asked whether the district feeds children whose parents never file; told it does — "Every kid gets it. We don't turn any kid away for food."
1:07:13Procurement corrective action: three thresholds, and a purchase order firstThe proposal "establishes three standards for procurement" — up to $5,000, $5,001 to $20,000, and above $20,000 for the business office only — and makes the purchase-order system the mechanism of permission: "I've just seen too many examples in a very short period of time of I bought this, now I need a PO. That's backwards." Broadrick called it "the first and most important corrective action we will ever adopt." Lavalette moved, Whitney seconded, and it carried unanimously.POSITIVE
1:12:30Petty cash, principals' checking accounts, proprietary bidsRapp: "The city did away with petty cash because of audit report discussing how it's difficult to keep track." Broadrick said each principal holds a checking account — "I don't like it, but I like the principals" — and asked for a year to work it out. Lavalette pressed on replenishment limits. Rapp then raised proprietary systems: a low bid on a fire-alarm system locks the district into that vendor's maintenance, "$1,800, $2,000 just to get them out, plus the hourly rate plus parts." Broadrick undertook to write bid-specification best practices as later corrective actions.POSITIVE
1:23:31Bus replacement — and the board waives its two-minute-old ruleThe bus totalled by a tree had a fair market value of $127,500 per the insurer; replacement is expected between $100,000 and $150,000. "Two minutes ago, you adopted new requirements that would make me go out to bid. You also have the ability to waive those requirements. Let us get two quotes as fast as we can and buy a bus." Whitney moved to authorize two bids with a report back; carried unanimously. Broadrick then "plant[ed] a seed": ten buses with a ten-year life should mean a bus in every operating budget.POSITIVE
1:26:59Facilities: nine of 27 summer projects unfinished"There were I think 27 items. And as of a few days ago, nine of them are not complete yet." Broadrick flagged "an internal tradition of trying to do these jobs ourselves" — water-supply valves in the Maple Avenue art wing among them: "I would hire a plumber tomorrow if I could get that job done." The board told him to get the work done. On capital planning he proposed staff complete a self-assessment workbook for four buildings rather than pay roughly $35,000 per building for engineering assessments; Howard said a recent assessment of the tech center already exists.OBSERVATION
1:35:41Grants moving again; Medicaid reimbursement downGrant reports are being submitted and approved "pretty quickly, and that means that there is money coming in," with Katie Bullock newly in the grant-bookkeeper role. Medicaid reimbursements "not too long ago were a lot higher than the last couple of years"; the FY26 total is not expected from HHS until late September. Broadrick named the administrative assistant who does the work and said what is missing is a certified administrator to direct it — a consultant is being brought in to examine the Medicaid-to-schools program.OBSERVATION
1:39:28Special education aid: 13 students, $2.6 millionLavalette, "just for the folks at home": "the 13 children cost us over 2.6 million. That is correct." Broadrick clarified that more than 13 students are educated outside the district, but only these 13 crossed the reimbursement threshold — which he described as "three times the previous year's average per pupil cost. Statewide, roughly $70,000 for fiscal 26," leaving the first roughly $900,000 with the district. On proration: "if the amount of money in the state budget is 90% of the amount district's claim, we each get 90% of what we're entitled to reimbursed. It has gone as low as about two thirds." Madden replied that a recent bill means "it can't be prorated less than 90%."OBSERVATION
1:46:55Placements the district did not make"at least six students who are placed out of district from Claremont. Our IEP teams did not place… Department of Health and Human Services employees and judges, family court judges placed them out of district and in some cases out of state. We still get these bills." Broadrick contrasted the comfort of the $70,000 cap in a district with one such student against Claremont's exposure: "If it's ten kids, that's $700,000 in tax bills." Crawford: "it is not our staff that's making those judgments… these placements are out of our control."OBSERVATION
1:50:18Two teachers lost; a 1999 lease found"We've lost two teachers in the last week," one of them the teacher for a program that would have used the CCTV room — which prompted Jason Bonneville to find "the 1999 lease agreement between the Claremont School District and the CCTV board of directors to lease this room for CTV's use during certain hours for consideration of $1." Hiring: three certified special educators on the night's nomination report, a fourth interviewing, and "I would hire six people tomorrow if I could."
1:53:59Middle-school staffing at the minimumPrincipal Boynton: "math three science, three social studies and three E[LA]" plus unified arts. Broadrick: "with three certified educators in each of those content areas, we can function and be a school… we're not pretending that we can do it, but four would be better." Whitney restated the charge to the superintendent — open safely and provide state-mandated education — "and that's not the ideal." Lavalette reported searching that day: over 50 BCBA openings statewide and over 300 special-education postings.MEDIUM
1:58:37Dress code: what prompted itMadden: "I would characterize it as a very extreme and odd interpretation to dress code. That, coupled with a visit to the schools by school board members… we found a good proportion, I would say 10 to 20% of the students wearing hats." He described a student in a hood and earbuds facing the back of the room, with the principal and interim superintendent present and "nobody seemed to have any issue with it." Asked whether the proposal fixed his concern: "No it doesn't."
2:02:45Whitney's line-by-line rewrite on legal grounds"The word hostile has legally it is attached to like a, an expectation of violence. Whereas I think in some times in the school environment, people internalize hostile as uncomfortable… we're very careful about our dress codes in public spaces is because there are constitutional protections for free speech that's related to expression." She proposed replacement language throughout — headphones during instructional time, head coverings with religious, medical, safety and IEP exceptions, coverage "as reasonably intended by the garment," hems that "drag on the floor creating a tripping hazard," and required footwear for PE and laboratories.POSITIVE
2:06:24Howard's example, and the superintendent's one contributionHoward offered himself as the test case for vague terms, describing a slogan he wrote on his shoe in high school, and argued the word "hostile" is too subjective — better to name "messages that promote illegal acts, substances." Broadrick intervened once: "nobody has unreviewed discretion. Disciplinary decision by a principal may be appealed by a parent or guardian and student to me, and my decision may then be appealed to a school board."POSITIVE
2:20:12Dress code fails 2–4After Rapp moved adoption and Lavalette seconded, the chair counted "two yeses" and "four against." Crawford: "I would vote in favor, but it's a moot point… this failed and the administration needs to go back and rework it." Whitney's stated reason was the pattern of late documents and deadline pressure: "we've got this deadline, and if we don't whip this out… then the kids are going to go without or we're not going to get the handbook to print." Broadrick confirmed no deadline forced the vote: the handbooks come to the board on September 2 anyway.POSITIVE
2:24:33Forensic audit: the firm was sold and never cashed the check"I'm waiting to hear back from [Bernstein Shur] about what's happening with CBI[Z], the firm that was engaged to do the forensic audit that has since been acquired… And remember, they haven't cashed the check… you sent them a $10,000 check as a deposit toward the forensic audit. If they had cashed it and then sold the company, I'd actually feel better." Madden said he may not support continuing: "I don't think there's going to be any criminal action… The the records were just too bad." Crawford recounted that local police referred the matter to the State Police, whose advice was to finish the annual audits first, then commission the forensic work. Howard urged looking beyond the acquiring firm; Rapp: "the public was pretty clear that they wanted this looked into."MEDIUM
2:35:08"I work for you"On reviving a Superintendents Advisory Committee: "I have not done anything about that since July 1st and before someone has a chance to ask me to, I work for you. If I start meeting with another group to get marching orders and they conflict with what you tell me… I'm going to do what you say." He proposed a survey instead of a standing committee, after Madden's account of an earlier advisory group whose meetings were "canceled at the last minute" and where "nothing happened."
2:43:46A caseload of 75, and the reorganization it prompted"One of the teachers in the district, I heard about this in June, kind of choked on my coffee for a second. Had a case load I think of 75… If a special education teacher is running meetings, writing IEPs, and providing services for 75 kids, something did not happen. That has to happen. There's just no way." The plan splits evaluation, case management and instruction into separate teams; two full-time case managers already worked remotely last year and a third has been added. Broadrick was blunt about the leadership gap: "the idea that I am the special ed director for the coming year should scare the hell out of you."MEDIUM
2:50:37Department of Education due diligence review"Whether the board has been aware of it or not, the district has been responding to a due diligence review by the [Bureau of] Special Education, for several months." It began with the former Academy program and widened: "In September of 2024, Claremont had 11 special ed programs in its schools approved by the Department of Education… so they were never approved last year." A consultant drafted the action plan, which the department has accepted; program approvals were to be filed by the end of the following week. Whitney raised the history of housing high-school special-education programs at the tech center; the answer, texted by Dr. Herrington mid-meeting, was that the programs will sit at Stevens and may share space.MEDIUM
3:03:28Personnel: nominations, a resignation, two vacanciesNominations carried unanimously. Madden asked to review HR procedures and see paperwork in advance — "You heard my comment about the island of Misfit Toys" and "connections were paramount in hiring some people." Broadrick: "I don't know any of these people," principals recommend them, and "we will have problems in the future" as any district does. The org chart shows the business administrator and special education director posts open — "These are the two hardest positions to fill in the central office after a superintendent. But it's two. It's not five."POSITIVE
3:09:22Job descriptions: coach evaluations in writingLavalette on the draft athletics job description: "evaluate all coaches in writing annually. Did you have a time frame where you wanted that done? So it's not all like I'm [evaluating] the football coach and I'll just turn them in at the end of the year?" Broadrick: within a reasonable interval of weeks after each season. He added that the last dated athletic handbook he could find was from 2017-18 and the copy on the website is undated, "which tells me that it's hard to determine if there have been annual reviews."
3:13:33Policies missed the agendaHoward: "I had sent [four] policies a week ago, but I think they flew under the radar because they are not in our agenda tonight… I think for nine two will be bringing six policies, possibly seven." He reported 11 policies passed since March that still need updating on the website. The chair took responsibility: "We are in a transition period. I will take responsibility for not getting those on the agenda for tonight."OBSERVATION
3:16:15Nonpublic session"I would entertain a motion to go into nonpublic under RSA 91 a three part two A, C and E summary." A second followed and a roll call was taken; the recording captures seven affirmative responses and then ends. The agenda's stated purposes were "Personnel" and "Negotiations Planning - SREA, Custodians, Secretaries, CAA."MEDIUM

Items flagged for review

Flags are a reviewer's aid generated by comparing the discussion against current state and federal law. They are not findings of violation, and nothing here is legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on.

HIGH Two August 6 payments — district payroll and a federal tax payment — left the district with no board or treasurer signature

The treasurer reported that on August 6 two payments "went in that were not signed. I found the vouchers. They were, but nobody signed them, so they were just put in" (0:15:45). Pressed by the chair to identify them, he named the school district payroll and the IRS tax payment, marked on his report as "Payment issued without board or treasurer" signature: "Neither of those were signed… by anyone" (0:16:22). New Hampshire law places district money in the treasurer's custody and directs that he "shall pay out the same only upon orders of the school board." The treasurer told the board the practice "was cited in, in our audit," and that he is still itemizing individual entries rather than moving to the monthly summary the chair proposed precisely "because they're still there" (0:18:31). In mitigation, the administration says the underlying causes are a vacant business-administrator post and a business office that was reduced at one point to a single employee, and both the superintendent and the treasurer described communication as good and improving.

Sources: RSA 197:23-a (treasurer's custody; payment only upon orders of the school board); 2 CFR 200.303 (internal control over federal awards); recording 0:15:450:18:31.

HIGH Year-end filings due September 1 are being assembled from data the superintendent calls "best guesses," while four fiscal years of audits remain unfinished under a new withholding statute

RSA 21-J:34, V requires school districts to file their annual financial report "on or before September 1 of each year," and RSA 189:28 conditions state and federal aid on complete and accurate reporting to the Department of Education. On August 19 the superintendent put the remaining work at "about four weeks" and said the receivables needed to close the year — tuition, Medicaid, special-education aid — were still being chased (0:52:49). He was candid about the foundation: "We don't have a good starting point. We're not going to have 100% solid ending point. Because remember, fiscal 26 started with Matt Angel[l]'s best guess… we know these are our best guesses" (0:50:09), and the district is responsible for Unity's FY25 filings as well. Meanwhile the FY22 audit remains in draft, FY24 and FY25 are not finished, and "as of right now, zero corrective actions have been adopted by the board" (0:41:09) — a statement that ceased to be true later the same evening. That backlog now runs against a statute enacted this year: since July 1, 2026, a district must file an independent audit or a certified financial report within six months of fiscal year end, certified by the board chair "under the pains and penalties of perjury," and the commissioner "shall withhold any and all state funding" from a non-compliant district until it is filed. For FY26, which ended June 30, that clock runs to December 31, 2026.

Sources: RSA 21-J:34, V (school district financial report on or before September 1); RSA 189:28 (reports to NHED; aid withheld pending complete information); 2026 N.H. Laws ch. 272 (SB 586), amending RSA 198:4-d, III — audit or financial report within six months of fiscal year end; chair's certification; mandatory withholding; 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1) (single-audit report due nine months after period end).

MEDIUM Manifests are approved by whichever two members can be reached, after the payments have been processed, and without the underlying vouchers

The manifests circulated at this meeting were copies of payments already made: "these are copies of every manifest since your meeting August 5th. They've been approved and processed because they have to" (0:04:54). Asked how members see them beforehand, the superintendent described the standing practice — "we send the call out… we look for two people who are available. And if you happen to have a challenging work schedule… you may never be aware of this happening" (0:05:54). The chair confirmed she was asked for two names and "stopped calling" once she had them (0:07:24). Members said vouchers used to be emailed in advance under the previous business administrator and no longer are, and Madden asked to see them when volunteers are sought. The treasurer separately noted that direct deposits reach the manifest as a single lump — "it doesn't make much sense to say, oh, I see $640,000. Okay. And you sign it" (0:14:14). Board orders authorising payment are the statutory hinge of the disbursement process, and an approval given after the fact, by two members, without the supporting vouchers, is thin documentation of that order. The administration has committed to electronic manifests by the end of September, which would let every member review each item before signing.

Sources: RSA 197:23-a (payment only upon orders of the school board; treasurer's independent books); 2 CFR 200.303 (internal control).

MEDIUM No minutes for the August 12 finance subcommittee meeting, nine business days after it met

The chair reported on the record that "the finance subcommittee met on August 12th and it was recorded. And it is on, CCTV… And we have a meeting on September 15th" (3:12:54). A subcommittee of a school board is a "public body" in its own right under the Right-to-Know Law, and minutes must be "promptly recorded and open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting" — a duty a draft satisfies. As of August 25, 2026 no minutes for the August 12 meeting appear in the district's Meeting Minutes share (2026 and 2027 year folders checked, plus a Drive search for the dotted date), nine business days after the meeting. The same is true of the June 19, 2026 finance subcommittee meeting. This is a recurring pattern for this subcommittee rather than a one-off; the board's own packets show it is capable of posting subcommittee minutes when they are prepared. Note that the minutes of this August 19 meeting were not yet due when this page was generated — that clock ran to August 26.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) (subcommittees are public bodies); RSA 91-A:2, II (minutes open to inspection within 5 business days); district Meeting Minutes share (checked 2026-08-25).

MEDIUM Nonpublic session cited exemption II(e) for what the agenda describes as collective-bargaining planning

The motion stated its exemptions on its face and was taken by roll call, which is what RSA 91-A:3, I(b) requires (3:16:15). The question is the fit of one exemption. The agenda gives the session's purposes as "Personnel" and "Negotiations Planning - SREA, Custodians, Secretaries, CAA," and the motion invoked II(a), II(c) and II(e). Subparagraph II(e) covers "consideration or negotiation of pending claims or litigation which has been threatened in writing or filed by or against the public body" — not union bargaining. Collective-bargaining strategy is handled differently in the statute: RSA 91-A:2, I excludes "strategy or negotiations with respect to collective bargaining" from the definition of a "meeting" altogether, so it is not a nonpublic session under 91-A:3 and carries no minutes duty. Invoking II(e) for bargaining planning conflates the two routes; it also matters downstream, because a II(e) nonpublic session generates minutes that must be disclosed within 72 hours unless sealed by a recorded two-thirds vote with a statutory finding. The recording ends immediately after the roll call, so this page cannot report what the board did on return, whether any action was taken, or whether minutes were sealed.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b) and II(a), (c), (e); RSA 91-A:2, I (collective bargaining strategy excluded from "meeting"); posted agenda, item VII.

MEDIUM Special-education program approvals lapsed for a year, and the district is under a state due diligence review

The superintendent disclosed that the district "has been responding to a due diligence review by the [Bureau of] Special Education, for several months," originating with the former Academy program and expanding to every substantially separate program (2:50:37). "In September of 2024, Claremont had 11 special ed programs in its schools approved by the Department of Education… so they were never approved last year" (2:55:22). He also questioned the coherence of the approved list, since programs in the same school were recorded as serving the same needs. Separately, one special educator carried a caseload of about 75 students last year (2:43:46), the district began the year six certified special educators short of what the superintendent would hire, and the special education director post is vacant with the superintendent filling it — his own assessment: "the idea that I am the special ed director for the coming year should scare the hell out of you" (2:46:59). Mitigation is substantial and on the record: a certified consultant drafted the corrective action plan, the department has accepted the schedule, approvals were to be filed within the week, and the board was told before the school year opened rather than after. This flag rests on the department's own review and the district's statements about it; the specific approval rules were not verified for this page and are not cited.

Sources: DDR Action Plan (linked from the agenda); RSA ch. 186-C (special education); N.H. Code Admin. R. Ed 306 (minimum standards; part page).

OBSERVATION Two figures stated about special-education aid do not match the statute

Discussing the aid program, the superintendent described the reimbursement threshold as "three times the previous year's average per pupil cost. Statewide, roughly $70,000 for fiscal 26" (1:45:00), and said proration has "gone as low as about two thirds" (1:41:09). Madden replied that a recent bill — the transcript renders the number as "15 63," and this page does not attempt to identify it — means "it can't be prorated less than 90%" (1:41:38), which the chair accepted with "Has that been been passed? Yes." The statute, as most recently amended in 2025, sets the entitlement threshold at 3½ times the state average expenditure per pupil, not three times, and provides that on proration "the department of education shall distribute to the school district not less than 80 percent of the district's entitlement in the fiscal year" — not 90 percent. Neither figure changed a decision at this meeting, but both feed budget planning for a district that reported $2.6 million of qualifying out-of-district cost for 13 students, and the difference between an 80 and a 90 percent floor is material at that scale. Worth confirming against the statute before the FY28 budget discussions the board began previewing here.

Sources: RSA 186-C:18, III (3½× threshold; proration with an 80% floor).

OBSERVATION A report showing "nearly $5 million of surplus" that is not a surplus

The FY26 budget-versus-actual report in the board's packet showed close to $5 million unspent, roughly half a million of which came from closing out stale encumbrances — some tied to the closed Bluff School — that had sat in the budget against invoices that never arrived (0:35:59). The superintendent declined to characterise it as a year-end position, with a large payables run in progress and two-thirds of an $800,000-plus SchoolCare assessment still unpaid (0:37:02). The care taken here is the right practice; the observation is that the document itself carries a number a reader could easily mistake for available money, in a district whose year-end fund balance is separately constrained by statute. Anyone reading the packet report without the meeting audio would need this caveat.

Sources: RSA 198:4-b, II (year-end unassigned fund balance retention limit and hearing requirement); recording 0:35:590:37:32.

OBSERVATION At least six out-of-district placements were made by state agencies and courts, not by the district's IEP teams

Broadrick: "at least six students who are placed out of district from Claremont. Our IEP teams did not place… Department of Health and Human Services employees and judges, family court judges placed them out of district and in some cases out of state. We still get these bills" (1:46:55). Sometimes, he said, the district learns of a placement "when we get the first bill for educational services." Because the district absorbs the cost below the aid threshold, each such placement carries roughly $70,000 of local exposure — "if it's ten kids, that's $700,000 in tax bills." The chair added that criticism of district staff for over-identification misses that "these placements are out of our control." This is recorded as an observation, not a concern about district conduct: it identifies a cost driver the board does not control and intends to raise statewide.

Sources: RSA 186-C:18, III (special education aid; district liability below the threshold).

OBSERVATION Basic records — tuition agreements, aid submissions, an athletics handbook, a building assessment — could not be located from within the district

Four separate examples surfaced in one meeting. Tuition agreements with neighbouring districts are "difficult to find," and the superintendent's "best luck has come by asking other school districts to send them to me," with the base rate apparently unchanged since FY23 (0:51:32). Five years of special-education aid submissions required tracking down the work of three different employees, one file found only after "a lot of running around in the basement." The most recent dated athletics handbook he could find was from 2017-18, and the copy on the district website is undated (3:09:22). A building assessment of the tech center existed, but two staff members told him it did not — a board member had it (1:26:59). Records that cannot be located are also records that cannot be produced on a Right-to-Know request, and the pattern bears on the same internal-control weaknesses the audits describe.

Sources: RSA 91-A:4 (availability of governmental records); 2 CFR 200.303 (internal control); RSA ch. 194 (school districts; tuition agreements).

OBSERVATION A draft-audit finding is being removed as hearsay while the same practice is documented elsewhere

The FY22 draft audit contained a statement that board members signed manifests after the fact. The superintendent reported that the auditor looked into it, found his staff "were repeating something that they had been told from within the SA[U], not something that they had seen documented," and "because that report is still draft, he's deleting the line" — adding, fairly, "It doesn't mean it didn't happen" (0:20:13). Two board members had treated that line as the basis for a possible forgery referral to the forensic auditors (0:22:04). Removing an unevidenced sentence from a draft report is ordinary audit practice and arguably required; the observation is that the underlying question — whether manifests were signed after payment, and by whom — remains open, and the treasurer's own report to this meeting documents unsigned payments continuing into August 2026. The board may wish to record where that question now lives, since the audit report will no longer carry it.

Sources: RSA 21-J:19 (audits by independent public accountants); Valley News, 2026-01-02 (auditor Michael Campo, Plodzik & Sanderson) — reporting, not law.

OBSERVATION Packet posting and agenda control: one document in the folder, and four policies that never reached the agenda

The Drive packet folder for this meeting held a single item, the draft agenda; every supporting document — treasurer's reports, the curriculum and finance reports, the procurement procedures, the dress-code proposal, the DDR action plan, nominations, the organizational chart — was reachable only as a hyperlink inside that agenda document. Separately, the policy chair had sent four policies a week earlier that "flew under the radar because they are not in our agenda tonight," and the chair took responsibility (3:13:33). The treasurer also asked, during the consent agenda, that the August 5 minutes be corrected to name the forensic-audit firm rather than referring to it obliquely (0:03:45). No statute requires a district to post meeting packets, so none of this is a violation; the Right-to-Know Law's notice duty runs to the meeting, not to a final agenda. It is recorded because a reader trying to follow this meeting from the district's Drive folder alone would find one document, and because business a subcommittee prepared a week ahead was displaced without a public decision.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (notice of the meeting; minutes within 5 business days); packet folder "4. 8.19.26 -- School Board Documents" (one document, verified 2026-08-25).

POSITIVE The district's first audit corrective action — procurement thresholds and purchase orders — adopted unanimously

Hours after the superintendent told the board that "zero corrective actions have been adopted," it adopted one (1:18:05). The procedures set three tiers — purchases up to $5,000, $5,001 to $20,000, and above $20,000 through the business office only — and make the purchase order the instrument of permission rather than a document produced after the money is spent: "I bought this, now I need a PO. That's backwards" (1:09:01). The thresholds are local choices, which the superintendent said plainly, inviting the board to set them differently. Federal procurement standards for entities spending federal awards require exactly this kind of documented, competitive process, and the district's auditors have identified the absence of one; the board also heard that it will be asked to adopt bid-specification best practices as later corrective actions, and that vendors of 20 years' standing will be re-competed every three to five years (1:22:21).

Sources: Procurement policies & procedures (adopted draft, linked from the agenda); 2 CFR 200.318 (general procurement standards); 2 CFR 200.303 (internal control).

POSITIVE The treasurer is keeping independent books and publishing what they show

The treasurer's report reconciles the district's two bank accounts, identifies items for which he holds no voucher, and marks payments issued without signature — work he does because "right now they're not available to the public, and they should be and they should be available to the board" (0:18:31). He is pressing for direct deposits to be itemised on the manifests the board signs, and for the treasurer to be notified of incoming paper checks, "because the treasurer is supposed to account for where all money comes from and where all it where it all goes" (0:09:19). That is the statutory role being performed rather than assumed, and it is what surfaced this meeting's most significant finding. He has also told the board he intends to move to monthly summaries once the underlying exceptions stop appearing.

Sources: RSA 197:23-a (treasurer keeps independent books; annual report).

POSITIVE The bid requirement was waived on the record, with a report back required

Minutes after adopting the procurement rules, the superintendent had to buy a bus and said so directly: "two minutes ago, you adopted new requirements that would make me go out to bid. You also have the ability to waive those requirements. Let us get two quotes as fast as we can" (1:23:31). The board voted the waiver as an explicit motion with two quotes and a report back to the next meeting, rather than treating the new rules as inapplicable or ignoring them (1:24:54). He also committed to identifying the funding gap between the insurance settlement and the purchase price before spending. A new control's first test is what happens when it is inconvenient.

Sources: recording 1:23:311:24:54; 2 CFR 200.318 (documented procurement).

POSITIVE A policy affecting student expression was sent back for definition rather than passed under deadline pressure

The dress-code proposal drew a detailed public reading: which terms are enforceable, which are subjective, and where a school rule touches protected expression (2:02:45). Whitney offered replacement wording clause by clause; Howard argued a vague standard invites arguments with parents; Rapp and Lavalette wanted the improvement over a 2005 policy adopted now; Madden wanted enforcement on hats and hoodies addressed first. The superintendent's single intervention — that no administrator has "unreviewed discretion," since discipline is appealable to him and then to the board (2:13:37) — answered the concern underneath much of the debate. The motion failed 2–4, and the board confirmed with the superintendent that no deadline compelled a vote before the handbooks arrive on September 2. Two members proposed the revision go to the incoming student board members, "the ones that are going to be most affected."

Sources: SHS & CMS Dress Code Proposal (linked from the agenda); recording 2:20:12.

POSITIVE Hiring followed the statutory route: nominated by the superintendent, elected by the board

New Hampshire law provides that superintendents "shall nominate and school boards elect all teachers." The nominations at this meeting — including three certified special educators and an out-of-district coordinator — came to the board on a nomination report and were approved by motion and vote (3:05:42), with the superintendent explaining that principals recommend candidates and he does not personally interview classroom teachers. Madden's request to review HR procedures and see paperwork in advance was met with an offer rather than resistance: "Do you want to sit on teacher interviews?… if you want, you can." Given the recent history in which board election of staff was not consistently documented, doing this in public and by recorded vote is worth noting.

Sources: RSA 189:39 (superintendents nominate; school boards elect all teachers).

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Documents linked from the agenda (they are not in the packet folder)

Project files (relative links work when this page is opened from Output/HTML/)

Laws and rules cited on this page