Claremont School Board — September 17, 2025

Regular meeting summary generated from the meeting dialogue transcript, the posted packet, and the approved minutes. Vice Chair Petrin presided with Chair Whitney absent. Centerpieces: the elementary principals' own Plans 2 and 3, the 4–1 vote to move Bluff School's students, staff and classrooms intact into Disnard and Maple Avenue by October 20, the restoration of board manifest approval, and the public naming of the five applicants for the vacant board seat. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Start time
6:30 p.m. scheduled; call to order at 0:00:07 on the recording. The posted agenda also noticed a 6:00 p.m. nonpublic session under RSA 91-A:3, I & II(a); the approved minutes record nothing about whether it convened — see flag 1. No adjournment time is recorded in the minutes; the recording ends with the adjournment vote.
Location
Stevens High School — Auditorium, Claremont NH (audio broadcast on CCTV Channel 8). Moved from the technical center "because of the anticipated crowd"; Vice Chair Petrin announced meetings would return to the tech center afterwards.
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Meeting - 9/17/25 (2:23:42 — the public meeting end to end; the noticed 6:00 p.m. nonpublic session is not on the recording)
Minutes
9.17.25 Approved CSB meeting minutes — the approved version, used throughout this page; an earlier 08. draft CSB meeting minutes 9.17.25.pdf is also posted

Participants

Board, administration, the elementary administrative team and citizens'-comment speakers. Name spellings follow the approved minutes where the automatic transcript differs; the transcript's rendering is noted in parentheses. The approved minutes name no member of the public who spoke — every citizen name below comes from the recording, so wards and spellings are as announced at the podium and unverified against any official document (see flag 4).
NameRoleParticipation
Michael PetrinVice Chair — presidedTook the roll himself ("Our secretary is not here tonight"); moved the amendment removing the staffing update; moved the manifest-signatory appointment; announced the board-seat candidates; closed each discussion
Arlene HawkinsBoard member; SAU 6 Board Chair; Policy Subcommittee ChairMoved approval of the 9/3 and 9/10 minutes; explained the SAU 6 consulting contract; moved the motion that closed Bluff School; moved the manifest-delivery deadline; moved adoption of two groups of policies
Candace CrawfordBoard memberSeconded the closure motion; "I'm concerned about, plan three because I'm afraid to get to December. And we might have to go back to plan two"; named a manifest signatory
William "Bill" MaddenBoard memberAsked for the audit/deficit number; called for a roll call on the closure vote; named a manifest signatory; raised the two unfulfilled administration commitments under Other Business
Loren HowardBoard memberMoved "to support Option 3" — the motion died for want of a second; the sole vote against the closure; declined to be a manifest signatory; asked for an elementary-restructuring committee
Heather WhitneyChairAbsent — the minutes list her absent; Crawford told the audience the chair "is not here tonight because she had a lo[ss]", and Petrin said there was "no hidden reason" for her absence or Mr. O'Hearn's
Noelle KronbergSchool Board ClerkAbsent — recorded as absent in the minutes; the Vice Chair took the roll call and timekeeping was delegated to Mr. Madden
(vacant seat)Board seat vacated by Frank SpragueStill vacant; five members seated. Candidates announced at this meeting, appointment set for the September 24 special meeting
Kerry KennedyInterim Superintendent, SAU 6 (transcript renders "Miscarry Kennedy", "Carrie")Her first Claremont School Board meeting, six days into the job, while still serving as Claremont Middle School principal; recommended financial statements and personnel updates at every meeting; told the community closing Bluff "is not an 'if', it is a 'when'"
Matt AngellSenior Comptroller / Business Administrator, SAU 6 (transcript: "Matt Angel")60% of the way to a deficit figure; framed the choice as capacity, not money; introduced the manifest-approval problem
Melissa LewisPrincipal, Disnard Elementary SchoolPresented all three plans on behalf of the elementary administrative team — roughly 25 minutes of the meeting
Mark BlountPrincipal, Maple Avenue Elementary School (referred to on the recording as "Mr. blunt")Named in the minutes as part of the presenting Elementary Administrative Team; his school's staff generated the Plan 3 idea
Dale ChenettePrincipal, Bluff Elementary SchoolNamed in the minutes as part of the presenting Elementary Administrative Team; does not speak on the recording
Michael Koski · Jeff Small · Patrick O'Hearn · Mary HenryListed in the minutes' standing central-office mastheadNone speaks on the recording. Petrin noted from the table that Mr. O'Hearn and Chair Whitney, both central to the previous week's presentation, were simply "not part of the presentation tonight… there's no hidden reason". Ms. Henry remained on the masthead as Business Administrator although Mr. Angell held the role
Sherry WilliamsCitizens' comments (ward not stated)Asked how the special-education consultant would be hired under a freeze, and why the previous week's officials were absent with no explanation — "that kind of communication… you have to continue those kinds of things to continue our trust"
Amanda BartonCitizens' comments — Ward 2 (announced "Amanda Barton Award two")Favours Proposal 3; asked whether families would be given school-choice options and where Maple's special educators would travel
Charlene LovettCitizens' comments — Ward 2, former mayor of Claremont (announced as "Charlene Leavitt")"Personally, I'm for plan three"; on the cost of holding an empty building; proposed fundraising for substitutes and state legislative help
Tammy YatesCitizens' comments — Claremont teachers' union president; Bluff School teacher"Are scared. We're beginning to see. Trauma in them."; "I propose a proposal number three"
Hope DamonCitizens' comments — New Hampshire State RepresentativeReported on a retained building-aid bill, a Claremont-specific bill she would file the next day, and bipartisan proposals to strengthen audit-filing and reporting requirements — all pending, none then law
Heather DubrovskyCitizens' comments (ward not stated)Fourth meeting in four weeks; asked how far behind the district is and whether any ground had been gained
Unnamed Ward 3 speakerCitizens' comments — Ward 3Gave year-by-year Medicaid reimbursement figures and asked "Are we okay with not billing Medicaid and not pursuing these revenues with our current flow problems?" — see flag 7
Unnamed Ward 1 speakerCitizens' comments — Ward 1; former Claremont School Board member of 15 years (announced name garbled by the transcript)"I volunteered to sign those boundaries [vouchers]. I went in twice a month to say you [SAU] office at 7 a.m." — asked when the practice stopped; "It stopped during Covid"
Unnamed Bluff School teacherCitizens' commentsTaught in other districts and private schools; asked the board to choose the plan that avoids moving children twice
Additional unnamed speakersCitizens' comments — residents, parents, teachers and district staffRoughly twenty further turns across an hour. The approved minutes summarise them all in one sentence: residents "asked clarifying questions about Option 2 and Option 3… thanked the team for their 'excellent and viable' plans, expressed concern for teachers and students of Bluff School, and many asked the board to vote for Option 3"

Agenda

From the posted agenda, reproduced in the approved minutes (CSB Agenda 9.17.25). Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped entry for full text.

Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
6:00 p.m. (noticed)I. Non-Public Meeting Session: RSA 91-A:3, I & IIThe agenda quotes exemption (a) in full: "The dismissal, promotion, or compensation of any public employee or the disciplining of such employee, or the investigation of any charges against him or her, unless the employee affected (1) has the right to a public meeting, and (2) requests that the meeting be open, in which case the request shall be granted." Disposition: unrecorded. The approved minutes carry the agenda text and nothing else — no motion, no roll call, no entry or exit time, no statement of whether the session took place. See flag 1.
0:00:07I. Call to Order and Pledge of AllegianceScheduled 6:30 PM. Petrin: "I'd like to call the September 17th school board meeting to order. If all could rise."
0:00:55II. General Business — roll call by the Vice Chair"Our secretary is not here tonight, so, I guess I will take a roll call." Per the minutes: "Present: Michael Petrin, Arlene Hawkins, Candace Crawford, William Madden, & Loren Howard · Absent: Heather Whitney, Noelle Kronberg."
0:01:26II. Consent Agenda — 1. Amendments and Final Approval of board agendaPetrin: "I have one amendment to make. We are going to remove… the discussion of the staffing update at this time, and we'll move that on probably to the next meeting, but we're just not ready for that tonight." Minutes: "Remove item #3-Staffing Update · No further discussion · Move further with amended agenda."
0:02:14II. Consent Agenda — 2. Minutes Approval, 9.3.25 & 9.10.25On the recording an unidentified member says "Move that we accept the minutes of September 3rd and September 10th." and Petrin answers "Second. All those in favor? Aye. Opposed? All right. Seeing? None." The approved minutes record the motion as Arlene Hawkins's, seconded by Candace Crawford, voice vote, all present in favour — the minutes govern.
0:03:30III.1. Presentation on Consolidation Plans (Discussion/Vote)"Elementary Administrative Team- Melissa Lewis, Mark Blount, Dale Chenette." Plan 1 (last week's K-2 / 3-5 consolidation) withdrawn over bus-driver resignations; Plan 2 (Bluff classrooms moved intact to Disnard and Maple Avenue) and Plan 3 (redistribute special-education case management, no closure) presented in full (09_17_25 School Board Presentation). Disposition: Howard's motion to support Option 3 died for want of a second; Hawkins's motion for Plan 2 — Bluff students, faculty and classrooms moved fully intact to Disnard and Maple Avenue, target October 20, pending a Claremont Fire Department inspection — seconded by Crawford, carried 4–1 on a show of hands (Madden, Crawford, Hawkins, Petrin in favour; Howard opposed).
0:30:16III.2. Citizens CommentsPetrin opened comments, asked Madden to keep time, three minutes each, name and ward to be stated. Roughly an hour of comment, closed at 1:25:46, after which administrators answered the questions raised. The minutes record the whole period in a single sentence and name no speaker.
III.3. District Staffing Update (Discussion) — REMOVED FROM AGENDA"Patrick O'Hearn, HR Director & Kerry Kennedy, Interim Superintendent." Struck by the consent-agenda amendment before the meeting began. Personnel questions raised during public comment therefore went unanswered; the minutes record "No comment at this meeting on personnel questions raised during public comment."
1:54:11III.4. Announcement of Candidates for Vacant School Board Seat (Discussion)"Mike Petrin, Vice-Chair. Questions from the board will be provided to each candidate on Friday, September 19th via email." Five letters of intent: David Putnam, Don Lavalette, Kevin Tyson, Jeffrey Glover and Bradley Molton — Molton rescinding in favour of Glover. Candidates to appear at the next meeting to answer the board's questions.
1:55:36III.5. Creation of School Board Facebook Page (Discussion)"Ad Hoc Committee? Who will maintain and post… Discussion about hiring a temp communication expert for the acute phase of crisis… Claremont would not pay SAU 6." Hawkins described the three-part SAU 6 consultant contract (leadership support, communication services, operational review). Howard and Crawford both doubted a board-run page; no motion was made and Petrin closed the discussion.
2:02:25III.6. Approve Manifests (Discussion/Action)"Discussion on creation of policy to manage future invoice/payroll voucher signatures & board members need to sign off on manifest." Two motions, both unanimous: Petrin moved to appoint Candace Crawford and Bill Madden as the members empowered to sign invoices and payroll vouchers, Howard seconded; then Hawkins moved that the manifest be provided to board members no later than noon on the Friday before board authorisations, Petrin seconded — restated once at Petrin's request before the vote.
2:10:57III.7. Subcommittee Reports (Discussion)Capital Improvement, Finance, Curriculum and SRVRTC: no report presented. Policy Subcommittee (met that afternoon): second read and adoption of GBCE, JFAA and BEDG; adoption of EH, EH-R(1), EH-F(1), EH-F(2) as legal priorities; adoption of IHBI, AB, JICJ and DIH as priorities. Hawkins moved, Petrin seconded, all present in favour.
2:13:40IV. Other BusinessHoward: metal detectors at Stevens; the NHSBA delegate vote on October 25 resolutions; and forming a committee of parents, teachers and stakeholders for elementary restructuring. Madden: the promised report on the two interns never arrived, and "It turns out we don't have a whistleblower policy" — he and counsel distributed the RSA instead. Hawkins answered that policy DAF, coming on first read, would add a whistleblower section.
2:20:39V. Future Dates / Future Agenda ItemsYouth Risk Assessment discussion (Courtney Steele) in October. The September 24 special meeting "is not set in stone" — Chair Whitney was negotiating a City Council date conflict. "Claremont School Board Meeting: 10/1/25 · Claremont School Board Meeting: 10/15/25," both back at the tech center. Howard noted public seating there had been increased to 80.
2:23:39VI. AdjournmentHawkins moved, Petrin seconded, voice vote, all present in favour. "All those in favor? Aye. Thank you. Everybody." The minutes record no clock time for adjournment.

Discussion timeline — three plans, one closure vote, and the manifests

Times are from the dialogue transcript (Output/Dialogue/16857 SchoolBoard091725.mp4.CSV). Quotations reproduce the automatic transcript as-is, including its stutters and garbles; corrections are marked in square brackets. Where the minutes and the transcript disagree on who moved or seconded, the minutes govern and the transcript's rendering is shown.

TimeTopicWhat was said (leading text; hover/focus for more)Flags
0:01:37The staffing update is struck before the meeting startsPetrin: "We are going to remove… of the discussion of the staffing update at this time, and we'll move that on probably to the next meeting, but we're just not ready for that tonight." The item had been billed to O'Hearn and Kennedy. With it went the board's only scheduled window for personnel questions — and both the HR director and the chair who had run the previous week's staffing discussion were absent.OBSERVATION
0:07:02Plan 1 is off the tableMelissa Lewis, opening for the elementary principals: "Last week we heard a proposal… a quick summary of that is that we were closed. Bluff Elementary School is not would become a K-2 school, and Maple Avenue would become a three through five school." Then: "That idea is off the table for this reason. Sadly, we have had the resignation of three bus drivers. Transportation is simply not possible in that plan. So plan one from the principals point of view, is off the table."
0:07:50The problem statement"The elementary school principals are concerned about our ability to consistently meet the needs of all students for the school year at Bluff Elementary School… Due to an inability to fill open positions, positions that were open over the summer but didn't yield us any applicants. Deficit issues and subsequent resignations." Lewis returned to the same statement before Plan 3 — "the concern doesn't go away."HIGH
0:10:07Plan 2 — move Bluff intact"Meaning we would keep those students. Yes, they would change schools. They would not change trusted adults. They would not change their educators." One fourth-grade and one fifth-grade classroom to Disnard; kindergarten, first, second and third grades plus the PRIDE program to Maple Avenue, with two kindergarten classes combined into one of 20 children taught by two teachers, and two third grades combined into one of 29 with two teachers. "All teachers would remain with their children. And any paraprofessionals that are providing support outlined in a student's IEP that are currently working with them would travel with those students and with that teacher team."
0:14:22Plan 2's costs, and the contracted case manager"One addition would be a contracted service provider for special ed case management, because we need to meet the legal obligations that are outlined in our IEPs." Gains: "estimated financial gains, as we heard last week, of approximately $60,000 of the closing of Bluff School in October." Against that: "There could be some additional transportation costs, there would be moving expenses" — the maintenance director "would be seeking quotes to find out what is the best option to do that safely and most efficiently." No cost was ever stated for the contracted case management. Fourth and fifth grades: "a total of 49 students. 21 of those students are identified with needs through special education."MEDIUM
0:20:09The date that became the motion"What we would be aiming for is the new first day for students being October 20th, 2025." Before it: staff notice of change of assignment, packing days, moving days, and family notification of each child's new school, bus number, pickup and drop times, principal, secretary and school website. Lewis on the moving budget: "Orders by nature… another word, for it is thrifty. Some of our husbands use different words."
0:21:56Where Plan 3 came from"Now when we all left the last. Well, last week's meeting. Here's where Claremont educators are tenacious." Then: "I heard it from my staff Thursday morning. Mr. blunt [Blount] heard it from his staff. Ideas came forward and I got to see them on that Bluff Elementary School doing it themselves, trying to figure it out. What are we going to do? Claremont educators were at work Thursday like nobody's business." The plan the board voted against was written by teachers in the thirty-six hours after the September 10 meeting.
0:22:58One special educator for 46 studentsLewis: "You know that as of today, there's one special educator for 46 students at Bluff Elementary School. Again, due to that inability to fill some positions over… the summer. With no applicant applying the deficit issues we're facing and subsequent resignations, Bluffs current configuration looks exactly as I shared with you previously." A week earlier the acting superintendent had put district case managers at "in the 40s almost 50" and said delivering the services in those IEPs was impossible.HIGH
0:23:40Plan 3 — redistribute case management, close nothing"a special educator really has two roles. They provide specially designed instruction as a service to that student that's individualized to them and to their needs, as well as the case management." Under Plan 3: Disnard's three special educators take case management for all third-graders at Bluff (nine students); Maple Avenue's three take second grade (eight students); "Peace [case] management for students in fourth and fifth grade would be would be done through that contracted service provider that is 21 students"; Bluff's own special educator keeps kindergarten, first grade and all new referrals. "What financial gains are there to this proposal? There are none." Transportation impact: none.MEDIUM
0:26:41The interim superintendent introduces herselfPetrin: "I've been told that I forgot to introduce Miscarry [Miss Kerry] Kennedy. Miscarry Kennedy is our new interim superintendent." Kennedy: "I am still sitting as a principal of Claremont Middle School, a position I really took pride in… I start off every morning there I check in. There have been some designated, supervisors or principals substitutes for me, and I apologize because this is not exactly how we thought this was going to go this year." She was still hiring a CMS nurse. On accepting: "When I was asked to somebody have certification that could do this job, I was asked if it was something I could consider. I have considered it. I am here…"
0:28:56Angell: the money works, the operations don't"I met with the administrators early on in the season, and I asked them to be really just be creative in the ideas and in their problem solving. And so what you saw tonight is just that… I do see a path going forward financially. The only problem I see is a path going forward operationally… when we hit what someone termed the sniffle season, then we're going to run into problems and trying to address keeping schools open. Okay. Yeah, we're starting to see that already. And the other thing that I have been starting to hear is some of the local school districts are starting to try to poach our teachers."
0:46:04"Missing figures from this table"Sherry Williams: "I noticed that both plans require the hiring of the special educator consultant… if you could address, in the process of making your decision tonight, or at least acknowledge that somebody has to be hired…" And on the absences: "There have been missing figures from this table… I'm very surprised that last week's figures are not here tonight and there was no mention of them… So that kind of communication, at least very simply, this is why so-and-so wasn't here. Just like begun in the past. You have to continue those kinds of things to continue our trust."MEDIUM OBSERVATION
1:05:40The former mayor: plan three, and fundraise for substitutesCharlene Lovett: "I am a product of the school district and a product of this community… Personally, I'm for plan three." Her reason from the city side: it "is to keep an empty building because you have to enter it. It costs money and it doesn't always get offloaded as easily as you would like or think it could happen…" On the substitute gap: "there's a lack of funding for substitute. Is that correct? And if that's correct. Then why aren't we fundraising for that?… Because we're going people are going to get sick and we're going to have to have options." And: "we have the table, we have the people, we have the fortitude to fight our way out of the situation and come out stronger in the end."MEDIUM
1:09:56The union presidentTammy Yates, in a stretch the diarizer broke into one- and two-word fragments: "At this point, children… Are scared. We're beginning to see. Trauma in them. It is really hard for" — she went on that it had taken weeks to build a family atmosphere in which children felt safe, and that they were now afraid: "They're afraid of the uncertainty that… Has… Been created… In our building." Then, in her own office: "And encouraged and want to be in our school. As the union… President, I can say that… I am… Concerned about all of our teachers. These principles have done an amazing job to try to advocate for our students. Unfortunately, I do feel that the situation has been very difficult for the board. I personally don't feel that we as educators have been supported, and it's something that really hurts me, even the heart. And I would like to say that I propose a proposal number three."
1:11:55The Medicaid question nobody answeredA Ward 3 speaker: "We stopped. Filling [billing] Medicaid. In 2020, 2021. We were reimbursed $623,085 in 2021 2022. We were reimbursed 724,000 $757,000 in 2023 and 2024. We were reimbursed 828,000 $882,000 last year. We had a new director, probably not as familiar with Medicaid billing as the director with that he replaced. However, we were still able to collect slightly over $300,000 in Medicaid reimbursements. We did have to return $70,000 due to audit findings." Her question: "Are we okay with not billing Medicaid and not pursuing these revenues with our current flow problems?" No one at the table answered it on the record.OBSERVATION
1:20:50A state representative on bills that were not yet lawHope Damon described a retained building-aid bill in work session — "Pretty much the districts that had projects support the bill passing, and the rest of the state doesn't. So we're trying. It's not dead yet" — and a Claremont-specific bill she would file the next day. On accountability: bipartisan work "to require the audits to not only be done and submitted to the Department of Revenue Administration, which is already in statute, but they have not, and consistent about requiring districts who haven't submitted that to do so"; a proposal to route audits to the Department of Education with oversight where deficiencies are significant; and a request that all compliance and financial reports going to the superintendent and business administrator also go to every board member "so that there will be more eyes on what is happening and more awareness of reporting is happening."OBSERVATION
1:26:05"It's about whether we have capacity"Angell, answering the public: "some of the questions that came up were really good about whether this is a financial move or whether it's capacity. Capacity was a great word for this. This is about capacity. If if we choose, proposal number three, closing bluff is still on the table. If something happens during the… Winter, like sniffle season, we may come back to the community and say we have to close bluff. All right. It's as simple as that. It's not about the money. It's not about the $60,000."
1:26:55Kennedy: "not an 'if', it is a 'when'"The interim superintendent recommended financial statements and personnel updates at every board meeting, promised an organisational chart "so everybody knows who reports to whom", and told the room, per the minutes, that closing Bluff School "is not an 'if', it is a 'when'." On the room's real question — timing — she put it at 1:28:33: "It's more like when and when we can make this the best decision. Nobody wants this. I just want to preface that." She also said she was working with SREA and NHEA while exploring the closure.OBSERVATION
1:34:18Still no deficit numberMadden: "What's the progress of the audit? Do you have a number yet?" Angell: "so I'm 60% of the way to figuring out what the deficit is. I promise to have it done by this Friday. Unfortunately, trying to work on the plan here, I wasn't able to do it. It's going to be Monday or Tuesday." On the auditors: "They're not gone there. They're they're waiting for me to complete my work, and then they're going to come in."; "the state is coming in and doing some audits, so we've had to do some program audits. And that is more unusual than I've seen in other school districts because they're also concerned"; and "the Department of Revenue Administration has been calling me often."OBSERVATION
1:42:23Howard moves Option 3 — and gets no second"Unless Bill or Mike have any questions for them. I'd like… To… Make a motion of support for proposal number three. That's my motion." No second was offered and no vote was taken; the minutes record it that way. Howard argued on: "I think the big issue for this is substitutes. And if we can get money in the substitute budget, then it seems proposal three covers to special education needs. I think the one thing I'd really like to see is a number value attached to the contracted service for this." And against Plan 2's promise of stability: "It doesn't make sense to me to say that certainty would be any part of either of these plans… I think that's a pretty disingenuous representation of proposal number two."MEDIUM
1:50:29The motion that closed Bluff SchoolArlene Hawkins, across six short transcript fragments: "I move… That… We… And I'm not sure… Of the wording for… The motion. So Carrie [Kerry], I look to you for assistance. I look that we move the bluff students and faculty classrooms fully intact to Disney [Disnard] and Maple Avenue with a target date of October 20th, pending an inspection of the buildings by the fire department. Fire department?" The approved minutes render the motion as moving "the Bluff students, faculty, and classrooms fully intact to Disnard and Maple Avenue with a target date of October 20th pending and inspection of the building by the Claremont Fire Department" and record Candace Crawford as the seconder — the recording has Petrin saying "Seconded by Kennedy" at 1:53:37, which the minutes do not support and which the interim superintendent, not being a board member, could not do.OBSERVATION
1:51:06Howard: "absolutely baffling""I just don't see how we didn't see this coming. Of the 19 teachers, we decided not to ratify, which again, I understand the financial situation of that, but here we are sitting saying we would not be able to hire anybody. More than or three of these people were spent [SpEd] certified. Five of these people were from bluff specifically. Two of them were elementary school counselors." And: "I was the only person who voted to ratify them anyway, because I didn't believe that we had done the foresight to look at this list and go in a month. What are we going to be missing? Now, here we are. And the fact that we're voting to close bluff because of this decision is just absolutely baffling after hearing what we heard tonight." Crawford answered the other way: "I'm concerned about, plan three because I'm afraid to get to December. And we might have to go back to plan two… I really think it's better for the children to make the change now. It's still September."
1:53:42The vote: 4–1, on a show of handsPetrin summarised the motion — "to go with proposal number two. And move students from bluff to, discarded [Disnard and] maple, with the date of October 20th… With the fire department. Coming. In to the inspection." — then: "I'd like to, have a show of hands. All those in favor? Aye." Madden asked for a roll call. Petrin: "Those opposed? Yeah. Lauren [Loren]." Then: "The motion passes." Per the minutes: in favour Bill Madden, Candace Crawford, Arlene Hawkins, Michael Petrin; opposed Loren Howard. The board's Right-to-Know Law does not require a roll call on an ordinary public vote, and none was taken despite Madden's request.OBSERVATION
1:54:30Five names for one vacant seatPetrin: "Mr. David Putnam has put in his letter, to fill the vacant seat. We have a mr. Don. Mr.. Don, the ballot [Lavalette], has put in his letter to fill the vacant seat. Mr.. Kevin Tyson also his applying to fill the vacant seat. Mr. Jeffrey Glover is applying to fill the vacant seat. And Mr. Bradley Bolton [Molton], who I believe wants to rescind his letter, but he had initially applied to fill the vacant seat." Board questions to Chelsea, compiled and sent to every candidate; candidates to appear at the next meeting. Conflict disclosure: Kevin Tyson, named here as an applicant for this seat, is the maintainer of the Government Transparency Project that publishes this page. He had no role in the board's process beyond applying, and this page's account of it is drawn from the approved minutes and the recording.POSITIVE
1:56:26What the SAU 6 consultant was hired to doHawkins, as SAU 6 chair: "The board voted and is taking on the cost of three a contract having three components. One is leadership support… Sound some sound financial policies and to strengthen public confidence in our, in our district and our saw." Second, communication services: "We have heard loud and clear that there's misinformation. There are gaps in information." A question-and-answer forum, website tabs, a communications plan and "a crisis communication protocol". Third, an operational review: "It is not forensic. It is not criminal. The goal is to to identify what happened… They will research, review the systemic problems that resulted in financial mismanagement, errors made by leadership, a lack of type [tight] controls, and the failure of oversight where we're owning it. How do we have why do we have, in some instances, unqualified people in positions, income sources that were overlooked or that were over relied on or forgotten about and not accessed the way they should have been?"
2:02:25The manifests: "there are no members that are designated"Angell: "We issue vendor and payroll manifests, and it's normal to me that it's a standing item for the school board to review those manifests. And we're supposed to get them to them so they can ask questions. That's what I'm used to hear. That didn't actually happen. Right now, I think the the school board policy says that the manifests are to be, approved by the school board or two members that are designated by the school board." Then the sentence that matters: "Right now, there are no members that are designated for the school board." Hawkins confirmed from policy DK, "approved in August": "payments are authorized by the board… or two members who have to give approval to the electric bills, the bills that have to be paid in between the school board meetings."HIGH
2:06:51"When did that stop? It stopped during Covid"A Ward 1 resident and former board member: "I sat on that board for 15 years, numerous times. My question is in regards to signing the voucher. And I was on the school board. I volunteered to sign those boundaries [vouchers]. I went in twice a month to say you [SAU] office at 7 a.m.. They opened it up so I could sign vouchers, review them before I went to work." Then: "So my question is, when did that stop? It stopped during Covid. I think that's a question that needs to be identified… And that's how I learned about what money was in the budget and where it went." The board took no position on when or why the practice lapsed.HIGH
2:05:45Two designees, and a Friday-noon deadlineHawkins first nominated Howard and Crawford; Howard declined — "I'm not… Incredibly… Confident with… My financial ability to look at these, just them and then sign off on them." — and Madden volunteered. Petrin: "I'm going to make a motion to appoint Candy Crawford and Mr. Adam [Madden]. Second to as the members empowered to sign, payments that the invoices and payroll vouchers." Howard seconded; "Motion passes" at 2:08:24. Then Hawkins: "I also move that manifest to be signed by the Claremont School Board, be provided to Claremont School board members no later than noon on the Friday prior to Claremont school board authorizations" — restated verbatim at 2:10:20 at Petrin's request, seconded by Petrin, passed unanimously. The minutes record Crawford identifying the arrangement as a "checks and balance procedure".POSITIVE
2:10:57Policies adopted, including public access to district recordsHawkins: "The policy subcommittee met this afternoon… We're cutting back on paper so you don't have hard copies, but they were provided to you last week." Second read and adoption of GBCE, JFAA and BEDG (meeting minutes); then EH and its three attachments — public access to school district records and the Right-to-Know request procedure, waiver-of-charge form and affidavit of indigency — "identified as legal priorities"; then IHBI, AB (the NH Parental Bill of Rights), JICJ and DIH. Petrin, in discussion: "People will be excited to hear DIH is a fraud prevention and fiscal management policy." Motion Hawkins, second Petrin, all present in favour.POSITIVE
2:13:02What is actually paid upKennedy: "I just wanted to update the fiscal management pieces of concern. It's a big concern of mine to to make sure that everybody's aware of all the things that need to be paid up and where the status of the school care [SchoolCare], the New Hampshire retirement system." Angell, in full: "School care is paid up to date and so is it. Names? [New Hampshire] Retirement." The employee health trust and the state retirement system had been the two live questions since August.POSITIVE
2:18:42Two commitments the administration did not keepMadden: "As Miss Erica. Abby said, what happened to the report on the two interns? The administration committed to giving us a report. They haven't. All too often we have these things. We ask questions that commitment to come back and report to us. And it's just for gotten. So I would like action items like this listed under Discussion and action items with the date and left on until we get the report." Then: "there was also a commitment to distributing the whistleblower policy. It turns out we don't have a whistleblower policy. I believe that… Patrick O'Shaughnessy [Jim O'Shaughnessy, district counsel] and I distributed the RSA, and it's a political Patrick 100." Hawkins: "So on the first we're going to talk about Daff [DAF] which will add a whistleblower section two."OBSERVATION
2:15:03Howard asks for a real restructuring process"Either on the first or even next week, as soon as possible. Honestly, we develop a committee of parents, teachers. Any community stakeholders, who have a stake in what the elementary schools are going to look like next year. It's going to be a big discussion." He tied it to the district's whole footprint — "it's not just bluff we're talking about" — and asked that forming an elementary-restructuring committee go on a future agenda. Petrin asked him to email the items to the chair for the agenda.OBSERVATION

Items flagged for review

Flags are a reviewer's aid generated by comparing the discussion against state and federal law in force at the time of the meeting. They are not findings of violation, and nothing here is legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; where no verified rule reaches a concern, it is labelled an observation and says so.

HIGH A nonpublic session was noticed for 6:00 p.m. and the public record says nothing about it

The posted agenda for this meeting opens with "I. 6:00 PM Non-Public Meeting Session: RSA 91-A:3, I & II", quoting exemption II(a) in full. The approved minutes reproduce that agenda text and then stop: there is no motion, no statement of which II exemption was invoked on the face of the motion, no roll-call vote, no time in or out, no indication whether the session convened at all, and no nonpublic minutes anywhere in the district's public shares (verified 2026-08-25). The recording begins with the 6:30 public session and cannot resolve the question either way. RSA 91-A:3, I(b) requires the motion to enter nonpublic session to state on its face the specific statutory exemption relied on, and requires that the vote be taken by roll call. Paragraph III requires the nonpublic minutes to be recorded and disclosed within 72 hours unless two-thirds of the members present vote by recorded roll call to seal them, and that sealing vote must rest on one of the statutory findings. None of that appears anywhere. The board's own newly adopted policy BEDG covers meeting minutes. Two readings are possible — the session never convened, or it convened and was not documented — and the public record does not distinguish them, which is itself the defect: the citizen cannot tell which happened. Note the contrast with the August 14, 2025 meeting, where the motion, the exemptions, the mover, the seconder, the roll call, the times and the sealing vote were all recorded.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b), II(a), III (nonpublic sessions; motion must state the exemption; roll call; 72-hour disclosure unless sealed); RSA 91-A:2, II (minutes promptly recorded, open within 5 business days); 9.17.25 approved minutes.

HIGH The district was paying its bills with no board member authorised to approve a manifest

The business administrator told the board in plain terms that board review of vendor and payroll manifests "didn't actually happen", that district policy requires approval "by the school board or two members that are designated by the school board", and that "Right now, there are no members that are designated for the school board" (2:03:00). A former board member of fifteen years told the meeting he had personally signed vouchers twice a month at the SAU office before work, and that the practice "stopped during Covid" (2:07:14). New Hampshire law puts custody of district money in the treasurer, who "shall pay out the same only upon orders of the school board" — so an unbroken period of disbursements without a board order or a designated approver is a control failure at the point the statute cares most about, and it ran through the same years the district's audits went unfinished and its deficit went undetected. The board fixed it the same night (flag 10); nobody at the table disputed the account, and no one could say when or why the practice had lapsed.

Sources: RSA 197:23-a (treasurer's custody; payment only upon orders of the school board); RSA 21-J:19 (independent audits); 9.17.25 approved minutes (Approve Manifests).

HIGH One special educator for 46 students at Bluff; every plan on the table conceded the services could not be delivered as written

The Disnard principal, presenting for all three elementary principals: "as of today, there's one special educator for 46 students at Bluff Elementary School" (0:22:58). The problem statement she read on the record names the causes — positions that drew no applicants over the summer, "deficit issues" and subsequent resignations. Every one of the three plans presupposed outside help to close the gap: Plan 2 needs "a contracted service provider for special ed case management, because we need to meet the legal obligations that are outlined in our IEPs"; Plan 3 hands 21 fourth- and fifth-grade students' case management to that same contractor and produces no financial gain at all. A week earlier the acting superintendent had told the board that case managers carrying 40 to 50 students made it "impossible to deliver those services that are in the IEPs". New Hampshire's special-education chapter and the state minimum standards make delivery of each child's IEP the district's obligation regardless of staffing; the district's own officials described the obligation as currently unmet. In mitigation: the principals brought two costed-out routes to the board within a week, the plan adopted keeps every child with the teacher and paraprofessional named in their IEP, and the interim superintendent committed to standing personnel and financial reporting at every meeting.

Sources: RSA ch. 186-C (special education generally); Ed 306 (minimum standards for school approval — part page); 09_17_25 School Board Presentation (packet).

MEDIUM The approved minutes name no member of the public who appeared before the board

An hour of citizens' comments — the substantive input on a decision to close an elementary school — is recorded in the approved minutes as a single sentence: residents "asked clarifying questions about Option 2 and Option 3 of the Elementary Administrative Team presentation, thanked the team for their 'excellent and viable' plans, expressed concern for teachers and students of Bluff School, and many asked the board to vote for Option 3." No speaker is named. Yet the recording plainly identifies at least Sherry Williams, Amanda Barton, Charlene Lovett, Tammy Yates (the teachers' union president, speaking in that capacity), state Representative Hope Damon and Heather Dubrovsky, plus a former board member of fifteen years testifying about historic voucher practice. RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to include "the names of members, persons appearing before the public bodies, a brief description of the subject matter discussed and final decisions." The board's own draft minutes for September 10 named most speakers, so this is a departure from the same body's practice a week earlier rather than a standing convention. The consequence is practical: without the recording, a reader of the official record cannot tell that the union president or a sitting state representative addressed this vote.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (names of persons appearing before the public body); 9.17.25 approved minutes (Citizens Comments); 9.10.25 draft minutes (Citizens Comments, for contrast).

MEDIUM Both plans depended on a contracted special-education case manager whose cost was never stated, and on substitute money that does not exist

Plan 2 and Plan 3 each require "a contracted service provider for special ed case management" to meet IEP obligations — under Plan 3 that contractor carries 21 students. No hourly rate, annual cost, procurement route or provider name was given to the board or the public at any point in the meeting. Loren Howard asked for exactly that before voting: "I think the one thing I'd really like to see is a number value attached to the contracted service for this" (1:43:06). Sherry Williams asked how the hire squares with the hiring freeze (0:47:35). The former mayor asked why the district was not fundraising for substitutes if the substitute line is empty (1:07:08). The nearest thing to an answer was the business administrator's: he was "look[ing] at available dollars or what we have and try to allocate some sort of do[llars]" for substitutes. The board then voted for the closure plan without the number. Since the contracted case management exists precisely to discharge IEP obligations, its funding is not a detail: if the contract does not materialise, the compliance gap in flag 3 stays open. Where federal grant funds are used for such services, federal internal-control and procurement standards also apply.

Sources: RSA ch. 186-C (special education); 2 CFR 200.318 (federal procurement standards); 2 CFR 200.303 (internal control over federal awards).

OBSERVATION A school was closed mid-year by a single show-of-hands vote — and no verified rule required anything more

This is the largest decision of the meeting and it carries the lowest severity, because severity here tracks legal grounding rather than importance. On the record: the motion was made from the table without written wording ("And I'm not sure… Of the wording for… The motion. So Carrie, I look to you for assistance"), the interim superintendent supplied the language, the mover asked "Fire department?" aloud while framing the condition, Madden asked for a roll call and did not get one, and the vote was taken on a show of hands and announced only as "The motion passes" — the 4–1 tally and the names come from the minutes, not from the recording. No rule on this project's verified citation list requires a New Hampshire school board to hold a public hearing, publish a fiscal impact statement, take a roll call, or observe a notice period before reassigning students among buildings it already owns; the Right-to-Know Law requires a roll call only for entering nonpublic session. The board also took the vote without the district-wide deficit figure it had been promised twice (1:34:30), and while its own interim superintendent was describing the closure as "not an 'if', it is a 'when'" — meaning the alternative on the floor was arguably being weighed against an outcome already treated as settled. Howard's request that same evening for a stakeholder committee on elementary restructuring is the record's own acknowledgement that the process for the larger question still needs designing.

Sources: RSA ch. 194 (school districts generally); RSA 91-A:3, I(b) (roll call required only for nonpublic session); 9.17.25 approved minutes.

OBSERVATION Detailed Medicaid-reimbursement figures were put to the board and drew no response

A Ward 3 speaker read a year-by-year series — reimbursements she gave as $623,085, then $724,000 and $757,000, then $828,000 and $882,000, falling to "slightly over $300,000" in the most recent year, with "$70,000 due to audit findings" returned — and asked directly: "Are we okay with not billing Medicaid and not pursuing these revenues with our current flow problems?" (1:11:55). Nobody at the table answered, and the minutes do not record the question. These figures are the speaker's characterization and are not verified here against any district or state record, and school-based Medicaid claiming is not covered by any rule on this project's citation list — so no legal conclusion is drawn. The observation is the pattern: a specific, checkable revenue claim was made in a meeting about a $60,000 saving, and it produced neither a confirmation, a correction, nor a commitment to come back with one. A district-elimination of a Medicaid billing position was among the 20 positions cut on August 25, 2025.

Source: 9.17.25 approved minutes (Citizens Comments — the question is not recorded).

OBSERVATION The staffing update was struck, and two prior commitments to the board went undelivered

The one agenda item that would have answered personnel questions — "District Staffing Update… Patrick O'Hearn, HR Director & Kerry Kennedy, Interim Superintendent" — was removed by amendment before the meeting began, "we're just not ready for that tonight". The minutes then record, of the public's personnel questions, "No comment at this meeting on personnel questions raised during public comment." Under Other Business, Madden itemised two commitments the administration had made on September 10 and not kept: the report on the two intern salaries "probably out of line with market", and distribution of the whistleblower policy — which turned out not to exist, so he and district counsel circulated the statute instead (2:18:42). His proposed fix is a governance control worth recording: list such commitments "under Discussion and action items with the date and left on until we get the report." A member of the public separately noted that the officials who presented the previous week were absent without explanation. No verified rule requires a public body to keep an agenda item or to report back on a commitment, so this is an observation about follow-through, not a legal defect. The Policy Subcommittee's answer — a whistleblower section in policy DAF on first read — is the constructive half of it.

Source: 9.17.25 approved minutes (Consent Agenda; Citizens Comments; Other Business).

OBSERVATION The legislative remedies described from the floor were proposals, not law, in September 2025

State Representative Hope Damon told the meeting about a retained building-aid bill still in committee ("It's not dead yet"), a Claremont-specific bill she would file "tomorrow" for the next session, bipartisan work to add teeth to audit-submission requirements and route audits to the Department of Education, and a request to put compliance and financial reports in front of every board member (1:22:07). This flag exists to keep the record straight: none of these were law when this board voted, and nothing on this page should be read as applying a later enactment to a 2025 meeting. Her one statement about existing law — that the duty "to require the audits to not only be done and submitted to the Department of Revenue Administration" is "already in statute, but they have not" complied — is consistent with the DRA filing and audit provisions cited elsewhere on this page. Everything else is accurately reported here as her account of pending legislation and is not verified against any bill text.

Sources: RSA 21-J:34 (reports to DRA); RSA 21-J:19 (audits by independent public accountants).

POSITIVE The board restored manifest approval the same night the gap was disclosed

Told that no members were designated to approve manifests, the board did not refer the problem to a subcommittee. It appointed Candace Crawford and Bill Madden as the members empowered to sign invoices and payroll vouchers (Petrin moved, Howard seconded, unanimous), and then adopted a delivery deadline so the designees would actually have documents to read: the manifest must reach board members "no later than noon on the Friday prior to Claremont school board authorizations" (Hawkins moved, Petrin seconded, unanimous, after the mover restated the motion for the record). Crawford named it correctly; the minutes record her identifying the arrangement as a "checks and balance procedure". Loren Howard's declining the role on competence grounds — "I'm not… Incredibly… Confident with… My financial ability to look at these" — is candour worth crediting rather than criticising, and Madden volunteered in his place. That sequence puts the board back inside RSA 197:23-a's requirement that district money be paid out only upon orders of the school board. The interim superintendent and business administrator also confirmed in the same segment that SchoolCare and New Hampshire Retirement System obligations were paid up to date.

Source: RSA 197:23-a (payment only upon orders of the school board).

POSITIVE Right-to-Know records-access policy and a fraud-prevention policy adopted in one motion

The Policy Subcommittee brought forward, and the board adopted unanimously, policy EH (Public Access to School District Records) together with its procedure EH-R(1) for handling Right-to-Know requests and forms EH-F(1) and EH-F(2) for waiver and indigency in respect of electronic-record charges — the machinery a citizen actually uses to obtain records — plus BEDG on meeting minutes, and DIH, "a fraud prevention and fiscal management policy". A district that had spent a month unable to say what it owed adopting a records-access procedure and a fraud policy in the same motion is a substantive answer to the transparency complaints of the preceding weeks, and the EH series goes to the statutory right in RSA 91-A:4 rather than to public relations. Hawkins also flagged that a whistleblower section would come forward in policy DAF on first read.

Sources: RSA 91-A:4 (availability of governmental records); RSA 91-A:2 (minutes); Second Read Policies (packet folder).

POSITIVE Every applicant for the vacant seat was named in public, with questions circulated in advance

The Vice Chair read all five letters of intent into the public record — David Putnam, Don Lavalette, Kevin Tyson, Jeffrey Glover and Bradley Molton, with Molton's withdrawal in favour of Glover noted — and set out the remainder of the process: board members submit questions to the SAU, the questions go to every candidate on Friday, September 19 so each is asked the same thing, and the candidates appear at the next public meeting to answer before the board votes (1:55:10). RSA 671:33 leaves the filling of a school-board vacancy to the remaining members and says nothing about publishing names or questions; doing both, and inviting public comment on the candidates, is above the statutory minimum and is the practice a reader should expect to see repeated. Conflict disclosure: one of the five applicants named here, Kevin Tyson, is the maintainer of the Government Transparency Project that publishes this page. This flag credits the board's process, not any candidate; the account is drawn from the approved minutes and the recording.

Source: RSA 671:33 (filling a school-board vacancy).

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Packet documents (exact Drive names)

Related meeting pages

Project files (relative links work when this page is opened from Output/HTML/)

Laws and rules cited on this page