SAU 6 Board — September 11, 2025

Regular meeting of the joint Claremont–Unity SAU #6 School Board — the body that employs the superintendent, chaired by Arlene Hawkins, distinct from the Claremont School Board. At this meeting the board accepted Superintendent Christopher Pratt's resignation, appointed Kerry Kennedy interim superintendent, and engaged TMS Consulting. No minutes of this meeting have ever been posted in any district public share (verified 2026-08-25), so this 31-minute recording is the only public record of those three decisions and of the nonpublic session that preceded them. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
SAU #6 School Board (joint Claremont and Unity board). Unity's withdrawal takes effect July 1, 2026 and is referred to on the record.
Date
Thursday, September 11, 2025
Start time
6:30 p.m. per the posted agenda (scheduled 6:30 – 8:30 p.m.). No clock times for the nonpublic session or for adjournment exist in any record, because no minutes were taken — on the recording the board is in nonpublic between 0:04:02 and 0:04:24, and the recording ends at 0:31:01 moments after the adjournment vote.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Goodrich Community Room, Claremont NH; audio broadcast on CCTV Channel 8
Recording
Cablecast: SAU #6 Board Meeting - 9/11/25 (0:31:01 — public session only; the nonpublic session is not recorded and its length is not documented anywhere)
Minutes
None located in any district public share as of 2026-08-25 — not in the SAU 6 Schoolboard Packets share, not in this meeting's own packet folder, not in the later SAU 6 packet folders that carry other meetings' minutes, and not in the shared Meeting Minutes folder. Contrast the September 4, 2025 SAU 6 meeting one week earlier, whose draft minutes were prepared, posted and circulated. See flag 1.

Participants

Board members, administration and staff appearing in the record. Because no minutes exist, attendance here is reconstructed from the attendance roll and the two nonpublic roll-call votes on the recording, cross-checked against the roster printed on the posted agenda; name spellings follow the agenda and the previous week's draft minutes. Home-district labels are derived by subtracting the known Claremont School Board roster from the SAU roster, not stated on the face of either document. No citizens spoke: "Going on citizens comments. So. Seeing none. Move on."
NameRoleParticipation
Arlene HawkinsSAU 6 Board Chair (Claremont School Board member)Presided; presented the TMS Consulting proposal and its three rate structures orally; put all three votes
Rocco RuggeriSAU 6 Vice Chair (Unity)Present (first name called in both roll-call votes); named on the agenda as the presenter of both action items, "SAU#6 Office Administration Update" and "Consulting Services" (transcript renders him as "rock over Jerry" and "Rocco Ruggieri")
Shannon PopescuSAU 6 Board member (Unity)Present; seconded the motion to enter nonpublic session ("Second Shannon")
Kristel DavisSAU 6 Board member (Unity)Present; voted in both roll calls (transcript renders her as "crystal. Davis")
Atonya HartSAU 6 Board member (Unity)Absent — her name is read in the attendance roll with no audible response and she is not called in either of the two roll-call votes
Darlene AyotteSAU 6 Board member (Unity)Absent — answered for in the attendance roll with "Nope. Nope." and not called in either roll-call vote
Candace CrawfordSAU 6 Treasurer; Claremont School Board memberPresent; voted in both roll calls
Michael PetrinSAU 6 Board member; Claremont School Board Vice ChairPresent; voted in both roll calls (transcript renders him as "Michael. Patron")
Heather WhitneySAU 6 Board member; Claremont School Board ChairPresent; made the principal argument in favour of the TMS engagement — "there's a moral imperative to do everything in our power to provide protections for the district"
William "Bill" MaddenSAU 6 Board member; Claremont School Board memberPresent; argued at length against the consulting engagement and raised the whistleblower question under Other Business
Loren HowardSAU 6 Board member; Claremont School Board memberPresent; voted in both roll calls (transcript renders him as "Lauren. Howard")
Michael KoskiAssistant Superintendent, SAU 6Called the attendance roll and both nonpublic roll-call votes in the clerk's absence — a role the agenda assigns to the "Secretary"
Noelle KronbergSAU 6 School Board ClerkAbsent — the chair opened by saying "not going to be here today. So we'll need somebody to help with the, minutes as we go along." No minutes were subsequently produced. See flag 1.
Christopher "Chris" PrattSuperintendent of Schools, SAU 6 (resigning)Not present. Still printed as sitting Superintendent on this meeting's agenda roster. His resignation was accepted by voice vote at 0:05:20; no terms, effective date or severance figure were stated in public session. See flag 3.
Kerry KennedyPrincipal, Claremont Middle School; appointed Interim Superintendent at this meetingNot heard on the recording. Offered the interim superintendency by voice vote at 0:06:17 (transcript renders her as "Carrie Kennedy"). Madden's remarks establish that the board had interviewed her — "We just had an extensive interview with our new candidate that was just voted on it" — during the nonpublic session, which is not recorded.
Patrick O'HearnTemporary Acting Superintendent / Director of Human Resources, SAU 6Not heard on the recording. Named by Madden as having researched the whistleblower statute and internal procedures: "Patrick was going to give me what the internal procedures are. But he left in the morning."
Matt AngellSenior Comptroller, SAU 6Not heard on the recording; referred to by Whitney as work in progress — "if Mr. Angel[l] is not completed, what he needs to complete"
Mary HenryBusiness Administrator, SAU 6Not present; still printed on this meeting's agenda roster although she had been placed on administrative leave in August. Stale roster in the district's own posted agenda.

Agenda

From the posted agenda (SAU6 School Board Agenda 9.11.25 (1).pdf), which prints the full statutory text of RSA 91-A:3, II(a) and (c) beneath item III.1. Dispositions come from the recording alone: there are no minutes to check them against, and no vote counts were announced. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped entry for full text.

Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:03I. Call to Order and Pledge of AllegianceScheduled 6:30 PM. "Like to call the meeting to order. Seeing that I do have a corn [quorum]. We'll start with the Pledge of Allegiance."
0:01:07II. General Business — Secretary roll call of attendance"Mike, would you mind doing a roll call, please?" — taken by Assistant Superintendent Michael Koski, the clerk being absent. Answering or answered for as present: Hawkins, Ruggeri, Popescu, Davis, Crawford, Petrin, Whitney, Madden, Howard (nine). Ayotte answered "Nope. Nope."; Hart's name draws no response and she is not called in either subsequent roll-call vote.
0:01:38II. Minutes — 6/12/25, 8/21/25, 8/26/2025 & 9/4/2025Tabled again. "I noticed a little late that the minutes that were sent out for review, some of them, the formatting. Anyone else noticed that the formatting wasn't too well? I wasn't able to open them. I was only able to open the minutes from, Let's see. 826." Then: "We're going to table all the review of minutes until we get some an opportunity to review them. We made the effort, but, it just didn't pan out tonight." The same three sets had already been postponed on September 4.
0:02:29II. Agenda — amendments and final approval"Do we have any edits or revisions needed to the agenda?" — none. A member: "I'd make a motion to accept the minutes. Excuse me. The agenda as presented." Seconded ("Second. Second."; the chair credits Shannon Popescu). Voice vote, "All those in favor of accepting the agenda as presented?" No count announced.
0:03:01II. Citizens Comments"Going on citizens comments. So. Seeing none. Move on." No member of the public spoke at the meeting that ended a superintendency.
0:03:24III.1. Nonpublic session — RSA 91-A:3, II (a & c)"Motion to move into non public meeting for under RSA 91-8 colon three comma two A and C" — the transcript's rendering of RSA 91-A:3, II(a) and (c). Seconded by Popescu; the chair caught herself before a voice vote — "All those in. Oh we need a roll call if you don't mind, sir" — and Koski called the roll: Ruggeri, Popescu, Davis, Crawford, Petrin, Whitney, Madden, Howard, all yes. Exit motion and second at 0:04:24, roll call again, all yes. The session's length, content and any actions taken in it are undocumented. See flag 2.
0:04:48III.2. SAU#6 Office Administration Update (Discussion/Vote) — Rocco Ruggeri, Vice ChairTwo decisions were taken under this heading. First: "I would like to make a motion to accept Superintendent Chris Pratt's resignation," seconded twice, one comment in discussion ("Only wish, Mr. Patmore" — an ASR garble, most likely a wish of good luck to Mr. Pratt), and a voice vote at 0:05:20 — the chair called for ayes and did not call for opposed or abstentions. Second: "I'd like to make a motion to offer the position of interim superintendent to Miss Carrie [Kerry] Kennedy," seconded, no discussion, voice vote at 0:06:17 with "Any opposed?" put and no count announced. No effective date, compensation, severance figure or continuation of Kennedy's CMS principalship was stated in public session. See flag 3.
0:06:34III.3. Consulting Services (Discussion/Vote) — Rocco Ruggeri, Vice ChairThe engagement of TMS Consulting — rendered "Teams consulting" by the transcript and named "TMS consulting services" by the chair when she put the question. Motion at 0:08:35 "to accept the proposal as written," seconded, then twenty minutes of the meeting's only real debate. Three components: superintendent support at $1,500 a month; communications at $155 an hour; an operational review at $175 an hour capped at $25,000. Voice vote at 0:27:44; Madden had argued against it; the chair announced only "That passes." See flag 3 and flag 4.
0:28:52IV. Future Meeting Dates"So our next schedule saw [SAU] meeting is November 13th. Where? We should have some audits to review." The agenda prints this as "★ November 13, 2023". The wrong year is the district's own typo.
0:29:11V. Other Business — whistleblower protectionsRaised by Madden, who had asked for it in advance but found it not on the agenda; the chair took it under Other Business on the footing that no action could be taken on an unnoticed item. He reported being "contacted by the intermediary who says he has a number of whistleblowers dynamic come forward," that there is no district policy, and that the policy committee should consider adopting the New Hampshire school boards' model policy. Asked "What's the RSA?" he answered "Two seven, five, eight" — reproduced as spoken; this page does not verify or correct the number. See flag 6.
0:30:56VI. Adjournment"The other business. Second. All those in favor? Thank you." No mover, second or count is separable on the recording, and no minutes record them. The recording ends at 0:31:01.

Discussion timeline

Times are from the dialogue transcript (Output/Dialogue/16833 SAU6-091125.mp4.CSV). Several SAU 6 board voices could not be matched to a named member and appear as "a board member"; with no minutes in existence there is no document against which to resolve them, so this page leaves them unattributed rather than guessing.

TimeTopicWhat was said (leading text; hover/focus for more)Flags
0:00:35The clerk is absent and the minutes are already a problemThe chair, in the meeting's second sentence: "So, not going to be here today. So we'll need somebody to help with the, minutes as we go along. She offered to, create the minutes based on the video. So I think for the public session, that's what we'll do that soon. And for, when we go in, a nonpublic will have to get a volunteer." (The subject of the first clause is clipped by the transcript; from context it is clerk Noelle Kronberg.) No volunteer minute-taker is subsequently named on the recording, and no minutes of either the public or the nonpublic session were ever posted.HIGH HIGH
0:01:38Four sets of minutes tabled, unopenable"the minutes that were sent out for review, some of them, the formatting… I wasn't able to open them. I was only able to open the minutes from, Let's see. 826." The board tabled review of the June 12, August 21, August 26 and September 4 minutes — the second consecutive meeting at which minutes could not be taken up.OBSERVATION
0:03:24Into nonpublic — exemption on the face of the motion, roll call caught in time"Motion to move into non public meeting for under RSA 91-8 colon three comma two A and C." The chair began to take it as a voice vote and corrected herself mid-sentence: "All those in. Oh we need a roll call if you don't mind, sir." Koski then called eight members plus the chair, all yes. The exit at 0:04:24 followed the same form.POSITIVE
0:04:48Superintendent Pratt's resignation accepted — in about twenty-five seconds"I would like to make a motion to accept Superintendent Chris Pratt's resignation. Second. Second." One remark in discussion. "All those in favor of accepting Mr. Pratt's resignation? Signify by saying aye." — "Aye." — "Okay." No terms of separation were read, no severance figure was stated, no effective date was given, no opposed or abstention call was made, and there are no minutes. Everything substantive about the separation had happened in the unrecorded nonpublic session.HIGH MEDIUM
0:05:57Kerry Kennedy offered the interim superintendency"I'd like to make a motion to offer the position of interim superintendent to Miss Carrie [Kerry] Kennedy." Seconded; the chair asked "Any discussion?" and there was none; voice vote with "Any opposed?" put and no count announced. The candidate interview is referred to only in passing later, by Madden: "We just had an extensive interview with our new candidate that was just voted on it, Miss Carrie Kennedy. She told us all about her background."MEDIUM OBSERVATION
0:06:34The consulting proposal, described only aloud"there was a consulting firm, that has offered services at the support services at the administrative level. Teams [TMS] consulting… they have provided a proposal to offer consultation regarded to leadership." Three sections, each with a 30-day cancellation: superintendent support, communications, and an operational review. The proposal document itself is not in the meeting's posted packet, so the chair's spoken summary is the only public description of what the board voted to "accept… as written."MEDIUM
0:10:31$1,500 a month, running to June 30, 2026 unless cancelled"They have proposed a rate of $1,500 a month for those services." … "with a 30 day notice to end and through agreement, it could be extended if needed. And that will continue unless canceled. That will continue through June 30th, 2026." Superintendent support includes meeting the interim "twice a week if needed," email and phone availability, "leadership advice if needed on day to day," mentorship on action plans and guidance "through crisis situations." Six references were provided and four were called.
0:11:46Communications at $155 an hour"They have offered that service as an hourly service as needed. Build [billed] monthly at $155 an hour to be canceled with 30 day notice, and unless canceled, will be available and in place until June 30th, 2026." Scope: messaging "that can be used by all members of the school community to communicate about the current state of the schools," a general communication plan and crisis communication protocol, and consultation with "Saw [SAU] and community leadership on messaging."
0:12:30The operational review: $175 an hour, capped at $25,000"the goal of the operational review and report is, in summary, to identify what happened, what went wrong, and how to prevent it from ever happening again. They will dive into any systemic problems that resulted in gross financial mismanagement, any errors made by leadership, lack of tight controls, and any failure of oversight." … "They have offered this service at $175 an hour, with a cap of $25,000." Deliverables include "new job descriptions, new processes and procedures, manual for leadership and the essay [SAU] board… that include robust budget processes and financial reporting." A member's summary: "Best practice, not past practice."
0:14:32What is the board actually committing to?"if we don't cancel them in the 30 days, the first one, we're locked into having them until June 30th, 1500. Monthly" — the chair: "Correct. That's the way it's written." A member ran the arithmetic aloud at 0:15:07: "that's like a minimum of 15,000 ish. If we're expecting ten months, October ish to June 30th." Another put the all-in figure at 0:26:18: "if we did ten months and be around $54,000. And that's assuming we would use about 100 hours of their communications."MEDIUM
0:15:44Madden: "a consultant is someone you hire… and then they tell you the time""You know, there's the quip that a consultant is someone you hire, you, give you a watch to them, and then they tell you the time." On the superintendent-support component he pointed to the candidate the board had just chosen: "She seems like an extremely strong candidate with a very expensive [extensive] network of colleagues in the industry that she could rely on." On the review: "They're going to come in there going to look, I'm going to say, well, you have to do audits every year and not let it linger for five years… You're going to propose controls. I can tell you from what I've seen. We don't have controls anywhere on anything."
0:18:33"I think it's premature""I don't see a need at this point in time to hire a consultant to tell us to do that. So for those reasons, I think it's premature. I think little bit further down the road, we should hire a consultant to get all our controls in place and up to the industry standards."
0:19:01Whitney: "I felt there were no systems when I started on the board""my whole position on the board has been… my desire is, was to create systems because I felt there were no systems when I started on the board, and I felt the entire time that I was running in mud and I was calling everybody and asking for help on all the right places and consulting with all the right people, making all the right phone calls, all the right emails." … "I don't feel that I have the resources at my disposal with a skeleton crew at the say [SAU], with an interim superintendent that we're putting in for crisis control."
0:21:17"those foundational administrative procedures were not done, period""And they were getting through the day. And those those foundational administrative procedures were not done, period. It was just coming in and getting through the day. I don't know that to be the case, but if I am looking at individuals with good faith over the last 15 years, I have to assume that's what happened." Her answer to Madden's objection was a 30-day test: "If the if we find out in 30 days, this is a completely waste of time… I say in 30 days, they're gone." And: "Even if we did the best we thought we could, we're here. And I feel there's a moral imperative to do everything in our power to provide protections for the district."POSITIVE
0:22:40Madden: the controls exist; nobody follows them"in many, maybe most, maybe all circumstances, you have the controls there. But these guys are not following the controls." His example, from his own inspection: "You have the computer as software system, but I'm told that individuals come in at eight, nine, 10:00, but they're in their car at 4:00. They have a system where on the time sheets, the supervisor is supposed to check the time charges for those moments. I looked at it. In most cases, the supervisors do not check it off in many cases." He was careful to bound the claim: "this is just a cursory review. So I'm not saying I've been an in-depth study."OBSERVATION
0:25:14The case for buying the review anyway"It's it's relatively cheap in the grand scheme of things. And, you know, to everybody else's point, if it's 30 days and it doesn't work… we can throw it by the wayside." On the review: "if that's the first step to something being uncovered that can be turned over to law enforcement, I think it's worth the money that is before us." A Unity member framed it around the split: "I think it will help us unity move forward as as you separate from this su [SAU]… with some ideas of what maybe staffing at the sub [SAU] should look like after the separation."
0:27:44The TMS vote — passed, margin unknown"Ready for the vote. All those in favor of hiring TMS consulting services, per the agreement on the contract. Signify by saying aye. Any opposed?" Then: "And. Okay. All right. That passes." Madden had just spoken against it twice. No count was announced, no roll was called, and no minutes record who voted which way — so the margin on the district's response to its own financial crisis is not recoverable from any public record.HIGH
0:28:22An item asked for in advance that did not reach the agendaMadden: "We're going to discuss this. The whistleblower." Chair: "No, that wasn't on the agenda." Madden: "It wasn't an agenda. But I even asked that we discussed it tonight." Chair: "Speak to it at other business if you want… I didn't I didn't see that it was asked." She then set the limit — the transcript is garbled here, but the sense is that the board could take the item up without taking action on it.OBSERVATION
0:29:16Whistleblowers, and no policy to receive them"I've been contacted by the intermediary who says he has a number of whistleblowers dynamic come forward. I tried to hire an attorney to give me counsel. But I was conflicted on it… So we discussed this briefly, and Patrick was going to give me what the internal procedures are. But he left in the morning. And there's no policy" — followed by a proposal that "the policy committee" consider "adopting the suggested policy from the New Hampshire" school boards association. Asked for the statute, at 0:30:42: "Two seven, five, eight. I'll give you a continuity." The chair: "I just wanted to make it easier for anybody to find it."OBSERVATION

Items flagged for review

Flags are a reviewer's aid generated by comparing the discussion against current state and federal law. They are not findings of violation, and nothing here is legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; where no verified rule reaches an item it is labelled an observation and says so.

HIGH No minutes exist for the meeting that ended a superintendency, appointed his successor and hired a consultant

RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes of every meeting of a public body — including the names of members, the names of persons appearing, a brief description of the subject matter discussed and any final decisions — to be "promptly recorded and open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting." A draft satisfies that duty. Nearly a year later no minutes of this meeting, draft or approved, have been located in any district public share: not in this meeting's own packet folder 10. SAU6 9.11.25, not in the later SAU 6 packet folders that do carry other meetings' draft minutes, and not in the shared Meeting Minutes folder (verified 2026-08-25). The contrast is with the previous week: the September 4 meeting's draft minutes were written, posted twice and circulated. The failure was foreseeable and foreseen — the clerk was absent and the chair said at 0:00:35 that someone would "create the minutes based on the video." The concrete consequence is that the vote on each of the three decisions is unrecoverable: all three were voice votes with no count announced, and on the TMS engagement at 0:27:44 a member had argued against it moments earlier and the chair announced only "That passes." No public record shows how any member voted, or by what margin the district's crisis-response contract was approved.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2 (minutes: contents — members, persons appearing, subject matter, final decisions; promptly recorded; open within 5 business days); RSA 91-A:4 (availability of governmental records); MAP.md — the Drive walk that establishes the negative; the recording at 0:00:35 and 0:27:44.

HIGH Nonpublic session with no minute-taker arranged, no sealing vote, and no nonpublic minutes

RSA 91-A:3, III requires that minutes of a nonpublic session record all actions taken and be publicly disclosed within 72 hours, unless two-thirds of the members present vote — on a recorded vote — to seal them and determine that divulgence would render the proposed action ineffective, would adversely affect the reputation of a person other than a board member, or pertains to preparation for or the carrying out of an emergency function. This record shows none of that machinery operating. Before the session the chair said that for the nonpublic portion the board "will have to get a volunteer" to take minutes, and no volunteer is named on the recording. On the board's return at 0:04:48 there is no report out, no motion to seal, no two-thirds vote and no statutory finding. No nonpublic minutes for this meeting exist in any district public share. What happened inside is not trivial: Madden's later remark at 0:15:44 — "We just had an extensive interview with our new candidate that was just voted on it, Miss Carrie [Kerry] Kennedy" — establishes that the board interviewed the person it then appointed interim superintendent, and the separation of a sitting superintendent was evidently settled there too. On this record the 72-hour disclosure obligation was never displaced by a sealing vote, and nothing was disclosed.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, III (nonpublic minutes; 72 hours; sealing requires a recorded 2/3 vote and one of the statutory findings), and II(a), (b), (c); RSA 91-A:2; the recording at 0:00:35, 0:03:24, 0:04:24 and 0:15:44.

MEDIUM The terms the board voted on never entered the public record

Three decisions, and for each one the operative document or figure is missing from everything the public can see. The resignation: the motion at 0:05:03 was simply "to accept Superintendent Chris Pratt's resignation"; no separation agreement was read, tabled or referenced, no severance figure was stated, and no effective date was given. Reporting elsewhere in this project's window puts the severance at $39,500 on an agreement signed September 8 — that figure appears nowhere in this recording, and with no minutes there is no district record of it at all. The appointment: the motion at 0:05:57 named Kennedy and the position and nothing else — no effective date, no compensation, and no statement that she would continue as principal of Claremont Middle School while serving. The engagement: the board voted "to accept the proposal as written," and the proposal is not among the seven documents in this meeting's Drive packet, which consists of the agenda plus six files carrying four earlier meetings' draft minutes. The chair's spoken summary — $1,500 a month, $155 an hour, $175 an hour capped at $25,000, each cancellable on 30 days' notice and otherwise running to June 30, 2026 — is the entire public description of a contract a member estimated at "around $54,000." RSA 91-A:2 requires minutes to carry a brief description of the subject matter and the final decisions; RSA 91-A:4 makes the underlying records available on request. Neither obligation is discharged by a recording that captures only the motions.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2 (contents of minutes; final decisions); RSA 91-A:4 (availability of governmental records); packet folder 10. SAU6 9.11.25 (contents listed in the appendix); the recording at 0:05:03, 0:05:57, 0:08:35, 0:10:31, 0:11:46 and 0:12:59.

OBSERVATION A hiring interview held under the employee exemption, and an agenda that named neither the departure nor the appointment

The board's nonpublic motion claimed RSA 91-A:3, II(a) — dismissal, promotion, compensation or discipline of a public employee — and II(c), reputation of a non-member. What the record shows happening inside includes an interview of Kerry Kennedy for the interim superintendency. Because Kennedy was already an SAU 6 employee, the "promotion" prong of II(a) plausibly covers that discussion on its face; the exemption expressly written for interviewing candidates, II(b) (consideration of the hiring of any person as a public employee), was not cited. This page records the point without resolving it: the choice between (a) and (b) on these facts is a judgement a reviewer with the full record should make, and the board's own claimed exemptions are at least colourable. Separately, the posted agenda described the two action items only as "SAU#6 Office Administration Update" and "Consulting Services," so nothing on the notice told a reader that a superintendent's separation and a successor's appointment would be transacted. RSA 91-A:2 requires at least 24 hours' notice of the meeting; no verified rule on this project's citation list requires item-level specificity in a New Hampshire meeting notice, and none is asserted here. The same agenda still listed Chris Pratt as sitting Superintendent and Mary Henry as Business Administrator, and set the next meeting for "November 13, 2023."

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, II(a) (employee dismissal/promotion/compensation/discipline), II(b) (hiring), II(c) (reputation); RSA 91-A:2 (notice ≥ 24 hours); SAU6 School Board Agenda 9.11.25 (1).pdf.

OBSERVATION Four sets of minutes tabled for a second consecutive meeting, one of them unopenable

Minutes for June 12, August 21, August 26 and September 4 were all tabled: "the formatting… I wasn't able to open them. I was only able to open the minutes from, Let's see. 826." The same three older sets had been postponed a week earlier for the same reason — they had been sent electronically the day of that meeting with no paper copies. RSA 91-A:2's duty is to record minutes promptly and open them to inspection within 5 business days, and drafts of all four meetings do exist in the SAU packet folders, so the recording duty appears to have been met for those meetings; the statute sets no deadline for board approval, which is why this is an observation rather than a finding. It matters here for a different reason: the board's practice of carrying its minutes backlog forward meeting after meeting is the same practice that left this meeting — the consequential one — with no minutes at all. See flag 1.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2 (minutes promptly recorded; open within 5 business days); the recording at 0:01:38 and 0:02:07; the same items a week earlier on the September 4, 2025 SAU 6 page.

OBSERVATION Whistleblowers reported to be coming forward with no district policy to receive them, and payroll controls said to be unenforced

A board member stated on the record that he had been "contacted by the intermediary who says he has a number of whistleblowers dynamic come forward," that he had tried to retain counsel of his own and found himself conflicted, that the Temporary Acting Superintendent had researched the applicable law but "left in the morning," and that "there's no policy" — with a proposal that the policy committee adopt the New Hampshire school boards association's model. Asked to name the statute he answered "Two seven, five, eight," which is reproduced exactly as spoken and is deliberately neither linked nor corrected: no whistleblower statute appears on this project's verified citation list, so this page draws no legal conclusion from the number. The same member described, from his own inspection, time sheets at the district office where "the supervisors do not check it off in many cases," while bounding his own claim as "just a cursory review." Both items are speakers' characterizations, unverified here, and both were raised as an unnoticed item on which the chair permitted discussion but no action.

Source: the recording at 0:28:22, 0:22:40, 0:29:16 and 0:30:42. No verified rule on this project's citation list reaches whistleblower protection or municipal payroll timekeeping, and none is asserted.

POSITIVE The nonpublic motions met RSA 91-A:3, I(b), and every decision was taken back in open session

Both the entry and exit motions named the specific statutory exemption on the face of the motion, and both were decided by roll call — the chair caught herself beginning a voice vote and corrected it in the same breath: "All those in. Oh we need a roll call if you don't mind, sir." The posted agenda printed the full text of subsections (a) and (c) beneath the item, so a member of the public reading the notice in advance could see exactly what was being claimed. Every decision of the evening — the resignation, the appointment and the consulting engagement — was moved, debated and voted in open session after the board returned, and the debate on the engagement was genuine: a member argued against it at length and was answered on the merits rather than cut off. The failures identified in flags 1 and 2 are about what was written down afterwards, not about how the session was entered or where the votes were taken.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b) (motion must state the specific exemption; vote by roll call); SAU6 School Board Agenda 9.11.25 (1).pdf; the recording at 0:03:24, 0:04:24 and 0:15:44.

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Packet documents (exact Drive file names, duplicates and typography as the district filed them)

Project files (relative links work when this page is opened from Output/HTML/)

Laws and rules cited on this page