Claremont School Board — August 20, 2025

The night the district's financial crisis met the public: a letter from the Commissioner of Education, counsel on bankruptcy and receivership, the auditor's account of which years have actually been audited, roughly three dozen citizens' comments moderated by a volunteer — and the scheduled financial presentation that never happened. Generated from the meeting recording's dialogue transcript, the two-document packet and the approved minutes. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, August 20, 2025
Start time
6:30 p.m. scheduled; recess 6:40–6:44 p.m. to set up a portable PA system; citizens' comments closed 8:21 p.m.; adjourned by consent 9:06 p.m. (approved minutes)
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Claremont NH — auditorium plus an overflow gymnasium (audio broadcast on CCTV Channel 8)
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Meeting - 8/20/25 (2:28:02 — rolling before the call to order; the first minutes are largely inaudible while the PA was being fixed, and the recording ends on a garbled adjournment)
Minutes
03. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 8.20.25 (approved; they name every citizens'-comment speaker)
Related page
Claremont School Board — August 14, 2025, where the deficit was first disclosed

Participants

Everyone in the record. Name spellings follow the approved minutes, which took names from the sign-in book; the automatic transcript's rendering is given where it differs, and speakers the transcript could not name are matched to the minutes' sequence and marked as such. Citizens'-comment speakers are listed in the order they spoke; the ward is the one the speaker stated or the minutes recorded.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneyChairPresided; read the Commissioner's letter and the board's letter; answered the public after comments closed — "we don't know"
Michael PetrinVice ChairPresent; worked the room on audibility during the PA failure ("Mike, patron [Petrin], my right hand man")
Arlene HawkinsBoard member; SAU 6 Board ChairPresent; explained the SAU's role and apologized on the board's behalf — "We are sorry that we are here"
Frank SpragueBoard member; Finance subcommittee chairPresent; addressed directly from the floor on the audit question; named to the ad hoc committee
William "Bill" MaddenBoard memberPresent; named to the ad hoc committee with Sprague and Whitney
Loren HowardBoard memberPresent
Candace CrawfordBoard member; Finance subcommitteeAbsent — "unable to attend this evening… a prior family engagement that took her out of the state"
Noelle KronbergSchool Board ClerkRoll call; kept time on the three-minute comment limit and the speakers' sign-in book
James "Jim" O'ShaughnessyDistrict counsel, Drummond WoodsumOpening presentation on the district's legal options — supplemental appropriation, bankruptcy, receivership — and answers throughout the evening; the approved minutes record his conclusion that "the path forward is going to require intervention from the state" (transcript: "James Shaughnessy")
Michael CampoAuditor, Plodzik & SandersonExplained the audit process and its history; FY20 and FY21 are the last completed audits, FY22 finishing with a disclaimer of opinion; advised against a forensic audit "at this time" (introduced as "Mr. Nicole Campo" of "Cosmic and Sanderson")
Matt AngellComptroller, newly hired; later Interim Business AdministratorNewly arrived — the minutes say he "started two days ago," while on the recording he says he has been at it since "Yesterday afternoon": "there are no beginning balances. You can't rely on the numbers"; a month of nights and weekends to produce a cash-flow picture (self-identifies as "Matt Eagle")
Derek LickVolunteer moderator for citizens' comments; moderator of a neighbouring school districtAsked the day before; ran the comment period, the three-minute rule and the overflow room; twice asked the board to extend past the hour
Christopher "Chris" PrattSuperintendent, SAU 6Not present — "the superintendent is still employed by the essay [SAU], but he is not here tonight. And that's at the request of the board" (counsel)
Mary HenryBusiness Administrator, SAU 6Not present; her financial presentation was item 3 on the posted agenda and was removed at the consent stage. Counsel: "business administrator is not in charge of Claremont School District's finances any longer"
Michael HerringtonPrincipal, Stevens High SchoolLeft the room to fix the sound so the gymnasium could hear ("Mister Harrington's going to take a moment")
Chris CogswellCitizens' comments — Ward 3Asked how failing to track spending "is that not a criminal matter"; pressed on criminal negligence and accountability
Patrick AdrianCitizens' comments — Ward 1"where is the superintendent and Mary Henry?"; contradictory messages about whether school would open
Sheri WilliamsCitizens' comments — Ward 2 (transcript: "Sherry Williams")Parent of a Stevens senior; objected to item 3 being struck; asked whether the new comptroller replaces or supplements the business administrator
Nicole BouchardCitizens' comments — student, Stevens High SchoolRising senior applying to a "highly selective dream school" in November; what a mid-year closure would do to her application (gives first name only on the recording)
Zach Dragon-GreenwoodCitizens' comments — Ward 2 (transcript: "Zach Greenwood")Test scores against the budget: "We're 20 points behind the New Hampshire average"; "negligence, possibly a dereliction of duty"
Sean RobinsonCitizens' comments — Ward 2 (transcript: "John Robinson")Read the overages line by line from the previous meeting's packet: Maple Avenue salaries ~$127,000 over, middle-school salaries $117,000 over, $50,000 charged to a line with no budget at all
Miles SheehanCitizens' comments — student; 2024–25 student representative to the board (transcript: "Michael Sheehan"; he self-identifies as "Miles" on his second turn)Spoke twice: what rising seniors are supposed to do, then questions collected from classmates — "Why weren't the audits on yearly?"
Jerry CrossCitizens' comments — Ward 2 (transcript: "Gerry Cross")48 years in Claremont, former CEO; accountability and the reach of the crisis beyond the schools
Karin DenholmCitizens' comments — parent of Miles Sheehan; school administrator in another district (transcript: "Karen Denholm")"in my district, we have always had a yearly audit, and that is not something that you can't sign off on"; state underfunding since the Claremont decisions
Michelle Springer BlakeCitizens' comments — Ward 2If cuts must come, "cut from the top first" (the dialogue file does not capture her name)
Matt BeanCitizens' comments — Ward 1 (transcript: "Matt Beam")Seven years working for the district; "Find people who care about Claremont as much as we do, to be in charge of the school districts"
Asher James WilliamsCitizens' comments — student, Stevens High SchoolRising junior asking for himself and for people watching online: what is the point of opening for a month, and why weren't we told earlier
Rebecca VinduskaCitizens' comments — Ward 1 (transcript: "Rebecca Van")Parent, teacher and former city business-development employee; the reputational damage and colleagues who do not know whether they have jobs
Cash CaswellCitizens' comments — Ward 2"I feel like Chris walked into a mess, and now I feel like he's being taken to blame"
Tom WozniakCitizens' comments — Ward 3Property values and taxes: "Appropriations equal tax increases… Do you want to believe that this is going to pass in the deliberative session?"
Emily CharestCitizens' comments — Ward 2 (first name only on the recording)Parent of two elementary students; whether athletics survive, with seasons already starting
Hannah GassettCitizens' comments — Cornish resident, Stevens parent (transcript: "Hannah Gasset")Tuition-in family; who pays if Claremont closes, and what keeps and recruits teachers
Tom LutherCitizens' comments — Ward 1, previously Ward 3 (the recording renders the first name as "Paul")Recalled a past warrant-article meeting; "Hard times make for strong"
Shaylor DuranleauCitizens' comments — Unity resident, Stevens graduate (transcript: "Shaler")Reputation, recruitment and the tech center: "I am where I am because of the text [tech]"
Jason BenwareCitizens' comments — Ward 1; former School Board memberDetailed alternatives to cutting sports — team accounts, parent transport waivers, pay-to-play
Carolyn RedmanCitizens' comments — Ward 3"every year we get asked for more tax dollars, and we're getting less from the school"; her daughter's VLACS path as an option for uncertain families
Tanira RomanCitizens' comments — Ward 2Parent and staff member in a self-contained classroom; her job and her students (the dialogue file does not capture her name)
Jada JohnsonCitizens' comments — Ward 2 (transcript: "JP Johnson")"why is the Saw six [SAU 6] board not meeting until tomorrow?… Was this not important enough for them to maybe, I don't know, call an emergency meeting?"
Kellie GaydosCitizens' comments — Claremont teacher and parent (first name only on the recording)Moved to the district a year ago; teacher turnover, experienced staff replaced by first-year teachers, a student already leaving her class list for homeschooling
Chris IrishCitizens' comments — Ward 3; former School Board memberRecalled the loss of accreditation and the recovery; asked the auditor directly "What year, legitimately was the last official signed audit that we had?"; challenged the board to commit to keeping schools open
Ken LownieCitizens' comments — Ward 2 (transcript: "Ken Louny")"We heard from two people external to our core process"; asked the board to commit to a public statement every three days
Rachel MulchCitizens' comments — Ward 3Transfers, transportation and tuition if schools close — "is that Claremont paying for it? We don't have money. Who's going to cover that?" (the dialogue file does not capture her name)
Aron Lavella-SchaudtCitizens' comments — Ward 2Married to a former district educator; credentials of building and district administrators (the dialogue file does not capture the name)
Michael JanericoCitizens' comments — Ward 2 (transcript: "Michael Generico")"Are you cutting any staff, sports or any extracurricular programs? Where is the plan?"
Caren DufordCitizens' comments — Ward 1 (transcript: "Karen Duport")25 years teaching at CMS, homeowner since 1997, grandchildren about to enter school
Braden GassettCitizens' comments (transcript: "Braden Gasset")"I'm at work to pay the taxes"; students "shouldn't be here worried about whether they're going to school"
Zack ThomasCitizens' commentsThe minutes attribute to him the closing exchange — whether school opens, "Why was the last audit done in 2021?", and "you got them here under false pretenses" — which the dialogue file merges into the preceding speaker's cluster; see the method note
Hope DamonNH State Representative, Sullivan District 8Transportation duty as she stated it; "There is not a state requirement that audits be done annually"; pledged legislation requiring timely audits; state share under 30%, with 8% from the lottery; the court ruling issued that Monday
Karen Liot HillExecutive Councilor, NH Executive Council"I am sorry that the state of New Hampshire has failed for 35 years to adequately fund public schools"; daily contact with the Commissioner; would support a special session of the legislature (transcript: "Karen Leo Hill")
Wayne HemingwayNH State Representative; Claremont City Councilor at largeNamed in the minutes; the recording captures the remarks but not the name — "I also live in Claremont Ward one and City Councilor at large"; urged residents to watch board and council meetings
Michael AronNH State Representative, Sullivan District 8 (transcript: "Michael Aaron")"I will pledge to work with Representative Damon on this audit issue, requiring the audit on an annual basis"
Caitlin DavisNH Commissioner of Education (not present)Her letter, received ten minutes before the meeting, was read into the record: the Department is "actively engaged," but "At this time, this remains largely a local issue for the Claremont School District"

Agenda

Items and wording from the amended agenda reproduced in the approved minutes (packet document Amended CSB Agenda 8.20.25). Scheduled clock times are the agenda's own. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped cell for the full text.

Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:01:20I. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance (6:30 PM)"You all to the 20th. August 20th, 2025 Claremont School board meeting. All rise for the Pledge of Allegiance." The recording is already rolling, and the room cannot hear the chair.
0:01:36II. General Business — roll call (6:35 PM)Minutes: "Present: Arlene Hawkins, Loren Howard, William Madden, Michael Petrin, Frank Sprague, Heather Whitney ● Absent: Candace Crawford." Six of seven.
0:02:25II.a. Consent agenda (vote required)"I'm requesting that the board, with consent, allow me to modify the agenda to remove item number three. Mary Henry, business administrator presentation item number four, board discussion on financial update and move the order of the sequence of the discussion actions to number two to the one slot." Board consented. Approval of the 8/14/25 minutes was postponed by consent at 0:03:07 — "I do not believe anyone has had the opportunity to review" them. See flag 5.
0:04:16Recess — audibility (6:40–6:44 p.m.)"Already can't hear you in a gym here" from the overflow room; the chair recessed while a portable PA was set up and the Stevens principal worked the sound. The minutes: "Recess called at 6:40pm to allow the set up of a portable PA system so all public present can hear; meeting reconvened at 6:44pm." The meeting resumes at 0:06:44 — "Is that better?"
0:07:01Letter from the Commissioner of EducationRead by the chair, sight unseen — "I received it ten minutes ago, so I haven't had a chance to practice." Six things the Department expects: accounting for all FY25 revenues and expenditures to close the books, reviewing the current budget, "Completing all required financial audits," budget controls, and regular updates to the Department. Its central sentence: "At this time, this remains largely a local issue for the Claremont School District."
0:09:44Statement on behalf of the School Board"Every citizen of Claremont deserves to understand how we arrived at this moment." Audits under way; no emergency funding coming; the priority is opening schools. "Tonight, there will be no votes on appropriations.… No proposals to raise funds, and no discussion of specific cuts. At this time, we simply do not have the details needed to move in that direction."
0:12:34III.1. James O'Shaughnessy — the district's legal options to secure more revenueMoved to the first slot by the agenda amendment. Cash flow versus deficit; the supplemental-appropriation route; bankruptcy "still on the table"; no statutory receivership; "It's very likely that the path forward… is going to require action from the state." Detailed in the timeline.
0:23:41III.2. Mike Campo, Plodzik & Sanderson — explanation of the audit process"Update on financial audits." FY22 nearly done and heading for a disclaimer of opinion; FY23 started; the years he wants to reach are FY24 and FY25; a forensic audit is the board's call but not worth the time and money at this point.
6:55 PMIII.3. Mary Henry, Business Administrator — presentationAgenda text: "Current financial situation and assessment of capacity to open schools on time. Why the district has the deficit? Why was the severity not identified earlier? Cost cutting short term plan for funding and opening schools." Removed from the agenda at the consent stage; not delivered. The chair later told the room the board learned only "about an hour before this meeting" that there would be no presentation. See flag 5.
6:55 PMIII.4. Board discussion on financial updateRemoved with item 3. The board's discussion of what it knew took place after citizens' comments closed instead, without the underlying numbers.
0:28:05III.5. Citizens' comments — Derek Lick, facilitatorThree minutes each at the podium, name and ward into the clerk's book, an overflow gymnasium that could not see the podium. Roughly three dozen speakers over roughly an hour and a quarter, extended twice past the scheduled hour on the moderator's request. Minutes: "Public comments closed at 8:21pm."
1:43:48Board response after comments closedWhitney on what the board knows and does not; Hawkins on the SAU's employment structure and the board's apology; the school-opening question put to the board with no motion made; the auditor and counsel answering from the table; then the state delegation.
2:11:54IV. Other Business — potential ad hoc committee (8:20 PM)"Potential Ad Hoc Committee future meeting time and date." Sprague and Madden to meet with Whitney; meeting frequency and communication to increase. Angell then described his first month of work, and counsel divided the labour: comptroller on cash flow, board on cuts, counsel on the legal and state track.
2:12:47V. Future Dates / Future Agenda Items (8:25 PM)SAU 6 board meeting the following evening, 6:30 p.m. at the technical center; first day of school 8/28/25; Claremont board meetings 9/3/25, 9/17/25 and 10/1/25. "If we have information that drives a decision to change the opening date that will be communicated… [we] will have an emergency meeting."
8:30 PMVI. AdjournmentConsent adjournment at 9:06 p.m. The recording's final seconds are garbled — the transcript's last rows read "Email objection." and "Meaning that." — so the adjournment itself is legible only in the minutes.

Discussion timeline — the crisis in public

Times are from the dialogue transcript (Output/Dialogue/16776 SchoolBoard082025.mp4.CSV), which is speaker-diarized; several public speakers are labelled only by an approximate name or as "Unidentified public commenter" and are matched here to the approved minutes. Quotations reproduce the transcript verbatim, including its garbles; corrections are in square brackets.

TimeTopicWhat was said (leading text; hover/focus for more)Flags
0:02:25The financial presentation comes off the agendaThe first act of the meeting is to strike its reason for existing: "allow me to modify the agenda to remove item number three. Mary Henry, business administrator presentation item number four, board discussion on financial update." Consent given. Sheri Williams later, from the podium: "I was very disheartened to see item number three on the agenda being taken off of the agenda."OBSERVATION
0:04:16A recess so the public can hearA voice from the gym: "Already can't hear you in a gym here. You on that side?" The chair recessed for four minutes while a portable PA was rigged and the Stevens principal worked on the sound; the meeting resumed with "Is that better?" The minutes fix the times at 6:40 and 6:44 p.m.POSITIVE
0:07:01The Commissioner's letter: "largely a local issue""Dear school Board, the New Hampshire Department of Education is aware of the serious financial challenges currently affecting the Claremont School District… The Department is actively engaged in supporting your district as it works to address these issues. At this time, this remains largely a local issue for the Claremont School District." The Department's list: "Accounting for all revenues and expenditures in fiscal year 2025. In order to close the books"; reviewing the current year's budget; "Completing all required financial audits"; "Establishing and implementing budget controls"; regular updates, because "Regular updates will promote transparency and build confidence." Signed Caitlin Davis.HIGH
0:09:44The board's own letter"Much like the abrupt and disruptive nature of the pandemic, this crisis has taken shape suddenly and with wide reaching impact. But unlike the pandemic, we are weathering the storm largely on our own. There will be no influx of emergency funding or broad government support." And the limits set for the night: "Tonight, there will be no votes on appropriations.… No proposals to raise funds, and no discussion of specific cuts… As the financial picture becomes clearer and appropriations are required, every member of this community will have the opportunity to weigh in. That process will happen publicly through hearings, deliberative sessions, and ultimately at the ballot box."OBSERVATION
0:12:34Counsel: cash flow first, and only the board can decideTwo weeks of meetings with the Department of Education, the finance office and the auditors, and "It's not been clear for the auditors. It's not been clear for the board. It's not been clear for the commissioner." Angell — "He's an advisor to the board right now… over the last day and a half. I think he's just done an unbelievable job of trying to scour the records." The question: "is there enough cash or isn't there going to be enough cash?" — and the decision on delaying or opening school "is a decision that only the board is able to make."HIGH
0:17:31The deficit's size is still unknown"The district is in debt. There is a deficit… Right now, the amount of deficit is not known. Is that will require the district to come first with all of its outstanding audits, closely evaluate the 2024 2025 financials. That is a time consuming, in slow process." And: "We know that it is significant enough to require the district to take some historic steps to become solvent… You folks are facing a financial crisis that has not happened in New Hampshire."HIGH
0:21:12Bankruptcy explored; receivership has no statute"Our team is on my team in my office is also looking at bankruptcy, and there are other attorneys in the state who are also looking at the option of bankruptcy and whether that's actually a viable option… There are a tremendous amount of downsides to filing for bankruptcy.… So we are trying our hardest to avoid having to do that. That's still on the table." On receivership: "there's no statutory process for a receivership manager for a public entity like a school district or a town. There is no statute.… Legislature has not authored authorize the courts or the state to put a school district or a town into receivership… we're in unchartered territory." The supplemental-appropriation route was judged to have "legal issues," and "asking the taxpayers right now fully fund that deficit doesn't seem like a very good" idea. His conclusion, twice: "It's very likely that the path forward… is going to require action from the state."OBSERVATION
0:24:02The auditor: which years are actually auditedCampo: "We've been working on new audit for a number of years. And part of the challenge we've had is change in management over the years and the inability to get information from management. We, that continues to this day." On the theory that FY22 and FY23 explain everything: "I believe that results need to define that, not just the assumption… If there is a deficit for that year, it's not a significant nature… we're eager to get into fiscal year 2425, where we believe that there are issues with how fast [cash] flow is handled.… I can't prove that." His firm does "230 governmental audits in a year. Our typical turnaround on an audit six months." He had warned board members before the last meeting to "be conservative" with the numbers being presented.HIGH
0:25:58FY22 is heading for a disclaimer of opinion"We report an opinion on whether or not you can rely on the financial statements that are presented in your annual financial statements. We have had challenges of 22 and the the opinion is not going to be pleasant for that, because the records did not support the numbers that were in the financial statements. And share that you're going to have a disclaimer of opinion.… That is due to the lack of evidence to support the the figures that were present." He had asked the board for help getting records in March: "I need your guys influence. Since then I have got it."HIGH MEDIUM
0:27:07On a forensic audit"This did not happen in one year. But I also at that same point, I don't think it can be attributable to two years in the past. I think the current and the prior year really need to be investigated and looked at." On the forensic question: "That is completely discretion of the board.… They need to review the facts, discuss it with the attorney and decide if that's the right course of action. I will share with you that a a a forensic audit as time consuming and expensive. And unfortunately, the expense right now is probably not a priority for the school district. Why do you keep the school open? That doesn't mean it shouldn't be given serious consideration at some point."HIGH
0:28:15The moderator sets the rulesDerek Lick: "I was asked yesterday to come and volunteer my time tonight with the public comment portion of the meeting… I am the moderator for the school district, of the school district, the neighboring school district. And we had a we had a very similar meeting in the district in January with a great deal of anxiety from the public and meetings that typically had 40 people showed up at 1600." Three minutes each, podium, name and ward in the clerk's book, the clerk timing with a one-minute warning card.POSITIVE
0:32:03Cogswell: "How is that not a criminal matter?"Chris Cogswell (Ward 3): "How is that not a criminal matter? To withhold information on the spending of taxpayer dollars?" Counsel: "No evidence that we've encountered a fraud or misappropriation. So it doesn't mean it's not. We don't we haven't seen any evidence of that. It appears that this situation is the result of a lot of different things. Problems with the financial records. And poor management overall." Cogswell pressed with an analogy — a captain asleep when the ship hits the iceberg, a cardholder who never checks the balance: "How is that not criminal negligence?"MEDIUM
0:35:52"Where is the superintendent and Mary Henry?"Patrick Adrian (Ward 1) asked it first; Sheri Williams (Ward 2) asked whether the comptroller replaces or supplements the business administrator and said the community deserves to know why the two officials were absent. Counsel at 0:40:46: "They are still currently employed… They're employed by SO6 [SAU 6]… That board is not met since we've discovered this information. That board meets tomorrow night." And: "business administrator is not in charge of Claremont School District's finances any longer… the superintendent is still employed by the essay, but he is not here tonight. And that's at the request of the board."MEDIUM
0:41:51The students speakNicole Bouchard, rising senior: "I've written my thoughts down as it's an important subject to me… The last three years of my life here at Stevens, I have worked vigorously in my academics in preparation of applying to my highly selective dream school this November." Asher James Williams, rising junior, at 0:58:17: "if we cannot confirm that the school will be able to stay open, then what is the point of opening it even for a month" — and "why would we told about this at an earlier date?" Miles Sheehan, last year's student representative, at 0:47:36: "As a rising senior, being uncertain in what I'm supposed to do with my life the next six months is concerning."
0:45:49Robinson reads the overages aloudSean Robinson (Ward 2), from the previous meeting's packet: "The Maple Avenue Elementary salaries were over budget by about $127,000. The middle school salaries were over by 117,000. Stevens High School stipends and extended learning were overspent by double or triple their budget. District wide. We see $50,000 in contract services charge to line that had no budget allocation at all." His conclusion: "principles [principals] aren't monitoring their budgets and that the administration isn't being held accountable either… When the board asks for monthly updates and doesn't get them, that is another problem of failures." And: "If we can't manage the money we already have, we have no business asking for more."MEDIUM
0:53:12An administrator from another district on annual auditsKarin Denholm: "I know that in my district, we have always had a yearly audit, and that is not something that you can't sign off on. It has to be completed every year. So I guess I have questions about accountability for that." She also raised the state's own failure to fund adequately, invoking the Claremont decisions. Jerry Cross, 48 years in the city, framed it as reaching "well beyond the school district"; Michelle Springer Blake asked that cuts "come from the top first."HIGH
1:12:59What the cuts would cost familiesJason Benware (Ward 1, former board member) on sports: "I don't think you have to stop sports in order to cut money" — fall sports other than football are cheap, teams hold their own account money, parents transported children under waivers during Covid, and pay-to-play is available. Emily Charest asked whether athletics survive with seasons already starting; Shaylor Duranleau of Unity spoke for the tech center — "I am where I am because of the text [tech]"; Carolyn Redman offered VLACS as a fallback; Kellie Gaydos reported a student already leaving her class list for homeschooling.
1:19:07Why is the SAU board not meeting tonight?Jada Johnson (Ward 2): "why is the Saw six board not meeting until tomorrow? This meeting with us is tonight. Was this not important enough for them to maybe, I don't know, call an emergency meeting?… the people who are in charge of and possibly responsible for said crisis should be taking it a little more seriously." Counsel and Hawkins both explained that the SAU is a separate corporation with its own board — the employer of the superintendent and central-office staff — and that it met the following night.MEDIUM
1:27:26"What year, legitimately was the last official signed audit that we had?"Chris Irish (Ward 3), a former board member, put the evening's sharpest question to the auditor. Campo's answer, across four consecutive segments: "That was 20." "21." "Wrapping." "Up 22. Now." — FY2020 and FY2021 are the last completed audits, with FY22 being wrapped up. Irish had also read out the April board meeting's history: "We ended with a $1 million, $1.4 million surplus. A million was returned to the taxpayers 2022. We ended with a $500,000 in her plus [surplus], but $1.7 million was returned to the taxpayers."HIGH HIGH
1:28:18Lownie: a statement every three daysKen Lownie, a retired software-implementation executive: "My observation is it's remarkable that came for information and update and understanding. We didn't get that. We heard from two people external to our core process… I know it's not your fault, but when someone dies, you say, I'm sorry for your loss." His request: "would you commit as a board to more transparency in the next few weeks?… You read a statement tonight. How about a statement every three days? And here's where we are now."OBSERVATION
1:42:36The closing exchange: audits and "false pretenses""So I got another one for you, Frank. You ready? Why was the last audit done in 2021? I want to know the answer to that. Is it possible to know who is responsible for this catastrophe that you just set us all up for?… You drag these people here or they came here voluntarily, but you got them here under false pretenses that you were going to answer questions." The minutes attribute this to Zack Thomas; the dialogue file merges it into the preceding speaker's cluster (Braden Gassett). Comments closed at 8:21 p.m.OBSERVATION
1:43:48The chair answers: "we don't know""Is this anything that comes out of my mouth right now is going to sound like hot garbage. It's going to sound deceptive. It's going to sound untruthful. It's going to sound misleading.… When people say, I don't know, it's usually because they don't want to answer the question. We don't know. We thought about an hour before this meeting that we were going to have a presentation. We thought we were going to have accurate and sustainable numbers or or some modicum of a sustainable number or a target or a direction, and literally up to an hour for this meeting.… We don't know. And so that's what I have to sit here and tell you. Honestly, we don't know." A voice: that's unacceptable. Whitney: "Completely, absolutely, 100% unacceptable."OBSERVATION
1:45:23A board without its own financial capacity"not one person on this board has the capacity financially to do a financial audit? We don't… Not one person on this board can go into the saw six, look through the records and give you an answer. We are relying on other people to do that activity and that's it." On the new comptroller: "he told us more in one hour. Basically, he has a better handle on things in one hour than we've had for for weeks" — the minutes put it as two days against four years. And on the calendar: "the board has voted on a calendar… the last vote that determine what day of school, the what day school was going to start has already been voted on."MEDIUM
1:47:09Hawkins: whose failure this is, and an apology"The say you [SAU] is responsible for hiring the superintendent. And then he in turn hires the staff at the central office… The essay itself does not have any schools." And: "This issue is an saw [SAU] issue in that the structure that we oversee and work with, the financials are the issue in Claremont, because this is where the schools are. I don't say that lightly… someone said they did not hear the words, I'm sorry for this board.… We are sorry that we are here. We would rather not be just as you would be."MEDIUM
1:48:49School opens on the 28th — no motion made"given the information that we have, we are.… Opening school.… On the date that on the 28th of August. The only way that changes is that the member makes a motion to to delay school. If no one makes a motion to delay school, the discussion to the way school has ended and school opens on the 28th. So the question to the board is, does anyone want to make a motion?" No motion came. Asked how long the schools could then stay open: "Honestly, we don't have. We don't know."HIGH
1:57:05Why the audits did not happenCampo: "I have yet to work with a D, A [BA] and a current year of their work. I've been working with people who weren't around at the time, so when I go and ask them for why this efficiency [deficiency] is here, I get I get blank looks. In some cases, I know that the building was renovated. I think some records actually just went missing at the start.… I had a very tough time doing this. As I said, typical order for us. We do have some very large audience [audits], including the city of Lebanon… We are turnaround. It's not years, months." On the new comptroller: "my firm has worked with Mr. Angel[l] before… I can tell you from what I just talked to him about before I got more from him than I've gotten in the last couple of years. In terms of per records."HIGH MEDIUM
1:58:56"There are laws that require… nonpublic"Asked why the next night's SAU meeting held only a nonpublic item, the chair answered: "There are laws that require that when you are discussing personnel issues they are done in nonpublic. Unless the personnel request for public hearing. We have got to follow the law… it's not a nice answer for people who want public information. I understand we want public information, but this is the law and we have to follow." The Right-to-Know Law is narrower than that — see flag 4.MEDIUM
2:01:08Rep. Damon: audits, transportation, and 30% of the cost"There is not a state requirement that audits be done annually. The state statute says they may be done. I will be bringing legislation forward this fall to required to require an annual audit by all school districts that is submitted to the Department of Education, and I will explore… whether there should be a consequence in that statute that you don't get money from the state if you don't file your audit in a timely manner." On funding: "the state is less than 30% of the cost of public schools, the federal government pays less than 10%… 8% of the cost of public schools in New Hampshire comes from the lottery, and that's included in the less than 30%… property taxes and communities throughout the state pay 65 to 70%." And: "We just had another court ruling come out Monday night of this week, finding largely against the state." She also stated the transportation duty for pupils living more than two miles from school — see flag 8.OBSERVATION OBSERVATION
2:05:14Executive Councilor Liot Hill apologizes for the state"I am sorry that the state of New Hampshire has failed for 35 years to adequately fund public schools in the state of New Hampshire, and that has led to the situation where you are tonight.… I am sorry that generations of students in the city of Claremont have suffered at the hands of an unfair school funding situation." She described daily contact with the Commissioner, said she would give the governor her summary of the meeting, and committed: "if a special session of the legislature is required, that would need to be called for by the governor and then voted on by the Executive Council. I will encourage my colleagues on the Executive Council to vote to support a special session." Rep. Hemingway and Rep. Aron followed; Aron: "I will pledge to work with Representative Damon on this audit issue."OBSERVATION
2:16:49The comptroller, two days in: "no beginning balances"Matt Angell: "I'm Matt Eagle. I've only been at this… Yesterday afternoon… My first course of action is to try to get the close of the books and get the audit caught up. When I looked in the system, there are no beginning balances. You can't rely on the numbers. For me to do a cash flow, I had to do, you know…" His plan: "get the books of the speed. Get the audit. Moving it. The skate [state] reports moving. Start reporting financial condition to the community, from the accounting system. And it's going to take games evenings, weekends… It's going to take me probably a good, solid month. And I will have something. It's probably going to be decent. It's not going to be at the standard at which I'm used to producing… I'm essentially coming here to get out of whole [a hole]." Counsel, in the fragments the transcript preserves: "To do that work. We need that number to know."… "How big the hole."… "Is."… "And what the cash flow looks like and how much money."… "We're going to need. To borrow."HIGH MEDIUM
2:20:51What families can do, and what happens to the superintendentCounsel: "if the superintendent status has officially changed any way, the community will know there will be an announcement… the district and the CEO [SAU] needs to have someone designated as superintendent, which could be like sort of temporary." On leaving the district: "While the district is operating the school district, your resident students have an obligation to attend that school district. There is some reassignment options. Under the law, you can demonstrate manifest educational hardship. You can attend charter schools, you can homeschool. There's education freedom accounts… Claremont wouldn't be obligated to pay that tuition right now."
2:27:10The only cost control in place: a freeze"we have a hiring freeze and a spending freeze in place. That's our biggest cost saving right now. Until we know what we are obligated to cut to meet certain targets, we cannot give any assurances… I'm just going to say no, I can't guarantee you that." And on the data: "when we are given more accurate data, which we haven't been able… We have been operating a no accurate data. Once we can get a handle on what the number is, we can start actually working towards a solution that is meaningful." Five days later, on August 25, the board voted to eliminate 20 positions and to cut non-mandatory extracurricular programs.HIGH

Items flagged for review

Flags are a reviewer's aid generated by comparing the discussion against the state and federal law in force at the time of the meeting. They are not findings of violation, and nothing here is legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; where no verified rule reaches a concern, it is labelled an observation and says so.

HIGH FY2020 and FY2021 are the last completed audits; FY22 will carry a disclaimer of opinion; FY24 and FY25 not begun

Asked outright at 1:27:26 what the last signed audit was, the district's auditor answered FY2020 and FY2021, with FY22 being wrapped up. He told the meeting FY22 will carry a disclaimer of opinion "because the records did not support the numbers that were in the financial statements," that his firm's normal turnaround is six months, and that the causes were management turnover, an inability to get information, and records that "just went missing" when the building was renovated. Independent audits of district finances are the mechanism RSA 21-J:19 provides, and the annual financial report they support is due to the Department of Revenue Administration on or before September 1 — twelve days after this meeting, with FY25 not closed. The Commissioner's letter, read into the record the same evening, listed "Completing all required financial audits" among the Department's expectations. Federal exposure runs alongside: for fiscal years before October 1, 2024 a district spending $750,000 or more in federal awards owes a single audit, and the reporting package is due the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor's report or nine months after the period ends — a window that closed long ago for FY22 and FY23. The record of this meeting does not state the district's federal expenditure totals, so the single-audit obligation is stated here conditionally.

Sources: RSA 21-J:19 (audits by independent public accountants); RSA 21-J:34, V (annual financial report on or before September 1); 2 CFR 200.501 ($750,000 single-audit threshold for these years); 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1) (nine-month reporting deadline); Valley News, Jan. 2, 2026 — later reporting on the audit findings and on auditor Michael Campo (secondary source, reporting not law).

HIGH The district could not state the size of its deficit, or how long it could pay its bills, while deciding to open schools

Counsel: "Right now, the amount of deficit is not known." The comptroller, two days into the job: "When I looked in the system, there are no beginning balances. You can't rely on the numbers," and a month of nights and weekends before there would be a cash-flow picture. The chair, asked how long schools could stay open: "Honestly, we don't have. We don't know." On that record the board let the voted school calendar stand — no member moved to delay — and told the public the only cost control in place was a hiring and spending freeze. The financial statements that carry the district's reported fund balance are the ones the auditor says the records do not support, and those figures drive both the September 1 annual report to the DRA and the year-end unassigned fund balance the statute caps. The mitigations stated on the record: an experienced comptroller with full access had been engaged, the auditor confirmed getting more from him in one conversation "than I've gotten in the last couple of years," and the board committed to more frequent meetings and an ad hoc committee.

Sources: RSA 21-J:34 (reports to the DRA); RSA 198:4-b, II (year-end unassigned fund balance); RSA 21-J:19.

MEDIUM Internal control over district spending had stopped working, on the auditor's and the public's account alike

The auditor described years of being unable to obtain records, no business administrator available for the year under audit, blank looks in response to questions, and records lost in a renovation. A member of the public read the overages line by line from the last meeting's packet — Maple Avenue salaries about $127,000 over, middle-school salaries $117,000 over, high-school stipends "overspent by double or triple their budget," and "$50,000 in contract services charge[d] to line that had no budget allocation at all" — and drew the operational conclusion: "Their science and principles [principals] aren't monitoring their budgets and that the administration isn't being held accountable either." The chair confirmed the board itself has no financial capacity of its own: "not one person on this board can go into the saw six, look through the records and give you an answer." The district administers federal education programs, and for those funds the Uniform Guidance requires internal controls giving reasonable assurance of compliance and, separately, records that support the amounts claimed. For locally-funded lines, no verified rule was identified that prescribes a monitoring cadence; the district's own Policy DA and Policy DK, adopted six days earlier, are the local instruments.

Sources: 2 CFR 200.303 (internal control over federal awards); RSA 197:23-a (treasurer's custody; payment only upon orders of the school board); RSA 21-J:19.

MEDIUM "There are laws that require… nonpublic" overstates the Right-to-Know Law

Explaining why the next evening's SAU 6 meeting carried only a nonpublic item, the chair told the room: "There are laws that require that when you are discussing personnel issues they are done in nonpublic… this is the law and we have to follow." RSA 91-A:3 does not require that. It permits a public body to enter nonpublic session for the matters listed in paragraph II — including II(a), the dismissal, promotion, compensation or discipline of a public employee, and II(b), hiring — and II(a) expressly preserves the affected employee's right to a public meeting if he or she requests one, in which case "the request shall be granted." Nor does the exemption cover the whole subject of a personnel problem: the vote to act must be taken in public unless the body meets the sealing conditions, and the motion to enter nonpublic must state the specific exemption and be carried by roll call under I(b). The distinction matters because it was offered to a room asking why it could not hear the discussion about its own superintendent and business administrator. Counsel's own framing that night was narrower and accurate — that the officials "are employees and have rights" (as the approved minutes record it), and that the SAU, not the Claremont board, is their employer.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b), II(a), II(b) (nonpublic sessions are permissive; employee may request an open meeting); RSA 91-A:2 (definition of "meeting"; consultation with legal counsel excluded).

OBSERVATION The meeting's central agenda item — the business administrator's financial presentation — was struck, and the public was told an hour beforehand

The posted agenda promised item 3, "Mary Henry, Business Administrator Presentation (Discussion) Current financial situation and assessment of capacity to open schools on time. Why the district has the deficit? Why was the severity not identified earlier? Cost cutting short term plan for funding and opening schools," followed by item 4, the board's discussion of it. Both were removed at the consent stage in the meeting's first two minutes. The chair's later explanation: "We thought about an hour before this meeting that we were going to have a presentation. We thought we were going to have accurate and sustainable numbers… We don't know." A full auditorium and an overflow gymnasium had come for those numbers; one told the board it had brought them out "under false pretenses," another asked for a written update "every three days," and a Ward 2 speaker said striking the item "should not have happened." No verified rule was identified that requires a public body to deliver a noticed agenda item — an agenda may be amended, and RSA 91-A:2 governs notice of the meeting rather than the fate of its contents. The finding here is one of accountability and of the record: the district convened its community around a financial presentation that its own business office did not produce, and the reason it was not produced was never stated on the record.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2 (notice; open meetings); Amended CSB Agenda 8.20.25; approved minutes, items III.3–III.4.

OBSERVATION Bankruptcy explored, receivership unavailable, appropriation impractical — the tools counsel described

Counsel told the public his office and others in the state were "looking at bankruptcy… whether that's actually a viable option," with "a tremendous amount of downsides," still on the table as a last resort; that for receivership "there is no statute.… Legislature has not authored authorize the courts or the state to put a school district or a town into receivership"; and that a supplemental appropriation — which would require Superior Court permission for a special meeting and then a vote — carried "legal issues" and was not a realistic answer. His conclusion, in the minutes' words, stated twice: "the path forward is going to require intervention from the state." This is counsel's characterization of what New Hampshire law does and does not provide, and is recorded here as such; no statute on this project's verified list creates a receivership or insolvency mechanism for a school district. What the verified list does show is the ordinary route the board's own letter pointed to: Claremont raises appropriations under the official-ballot (SB 2) process, through a deliberative session and a ballot vote, and voters may place petitioned articles before that process.

Sources: RSA 40:13 (official ballot referendum / SB 2); RSA 197:6 (petitioned articles).

OBSERVATION The audit-timeliness legislation promised from the floor — and what became of it

Rep. Hope Damon told the meeting she would bring legislation "this fall to required to require an annual audit by all school districts that is submitted to the Department of Education," and would explore "whether there should be a consequence in that statute that you don't get money from the state if you don't file your audit in a timely manner." Rep. Michael Aron pledged to work with her on it. Subsequent development, well after this meeting: that bill became SB 586, enacted as 2026 N.H. Laws ch. 272 with an effective date of July 1, 2026 — it was not law in August 2025 and has no bearing on anything said or done at this meeting. It is noted only because a citizen reading this page will hear the promise made here and reasonably ask what came of it. The obligations that did apply in 2025 are the ones in flag 1.

Sources: SB 586 (2026), enacted as ch. 272, effective July 1, 2026; NH Bulletin, Apr. 22, 2026, on the audit-filing bill (reporting, not law); RSA 21-J:19 (the audit provision in force in 2025).

OBSERVATION Statements of law made from the floor that this page does not verify

Two came from state officials and one from the chair, and each is reproduced above as spoken rather than corrected. Rep. Damon stated that "The state statute requires districts to pay for transportation for kids who live more than two miles from the school they attend" — transportation statutes are outside this project's verified citation set, so the two-mile duty is recorded as the speaker's characterization, not as law; it was offered to reassure parents that transportation would not change while schools stayed open. Rep. Damon also said "There is not a state requirement that audits be done annually. The state statute says they may be done"; the provision governing audits of district finances by independent public accountants is RSA 21-J:19, and readers should consult it rather than rely on either the summary or its rebuttal here. The chair's statement that personnel discussions must be held in nonpublic is addressed separately at flag 4. Counsel's account of school-choice options — manifest educational hardship, charter schools, home education, education freedom accounts, with Claremont not obliged to pay tuition — is likewise his characterization; no verified citation on this project's list covers it.

Source: RSA 21-J:19 (audits by independent public accountants).

POSITIVE The board made the meeting genuinely hearable, and let it run

When the overflow gymnasium could not hear, the chair stopped the meeting and recessed for four minutes so a portable PA could be set up — an ordinary courtesy that public bodies frequently skip, and one the minutes recorded with times. A volunteer moderator from a neighbouring district was brought in the day before to run comments, with a podium, a three-minute clock kept by the clerk, a one-minute warning card and a sign-in book so the names would reach the minutes. When the scheduled hour ran out the moderator twice asked the board to keep going, and it did: comments ran on past the hour to their close at 8:21 p.m., and roughly three dozen residents, students and officials were heard. The approved minutes then name every one of them and summarize what each said — which is why this page can list them. That is the Right-to-Know Law's purpose being served rather than merely satisfied.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2 (open meetings; minutes); approved minutes, item III.5.

POSITIVE Both letters read into the record, and the prior meeting's draft minutes in the packet

The chair read the Commissioner of Education's letter aloud in full ten minutes after receiving it, unpractised, rather than summarizing or withholding it, and then read the board's own statement — so the public heard the state's position ("this remains largely a local issue") in the state's own words. The two-document packet for this meeting consisted of the amended agenda and 8.14.25 DRAFT CSB Meeting Minutes.pdf: the draft minutes of the August 14 meeting were publicly available six days later, within the five business days RSA 91-A:2, III allows, even though their approval was postponed because members had not had time to read them. Small things, but they are the ones that let a resident reconstruct the week.

Source: RSA 91-A:2, III (minutes promptly recorded and open to public inspection within 5 business days; a draft satisfies this).

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Packet documents (exact Drive file names)

Project files (relative links work when this page is opened from Output/HTML/)

Laws and rules cited on this page