Claremont School Board — March 5, 2025

Regular meeting summary generated from the meeting video transcript, the seven-document posted packet, and the approved minutes. The longest recording in this quarter (2:51:47) and the last meeting before the March 11 ballot. Its spine is auditor Michael Campo of Plodzik & Sanderson, appearing virtually on the FY2020 audit findings and the state of the FY2021–FY2024 audits; the two student board members also give the board their first-hand account of the February 11 lockdown at Stevens High School. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6)
Date
Wednesday, March 5, 2025
Start time
6:30 p.m. (per the approved minutes: consent adjournment at 9:20 p.m.; no nonpublic session was held)
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Claremont NH (audio broadcast on CCTV Channel 8, per the minutes header)
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Meeting - 3/5/25 (2:51:47 — begins at the call to order and runs through the motion to adjourn; the largest of the ten Q1 2025 recordings, 1,003 transcript rows)
Minutes
18. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25 (approved)

Participants

Board, administration, student board members and outside presenters. Attendance and name spellings follow the approved minutes; titles are given only where the minutes supply them, and where a presenter's title comes from their own podium introduction rather than the minutes, that is said so.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneyChairPresided (196 segments). Opened by "requesting the board's generosity"; took the auditor out of order; questioned the safety-specialist salary and accountability at length; recorded as voting against the Acuity letter on the recording.
Frank SpragueVice Chair (also Finance Sub-Committee chair)Present (79 segments). Pressed the auditor on whether FY2020 findings were fixed by FY2021, raised the IRS/ACA matter, moved the school calendar and the Acuity letter, and objected to the safety-specialist salary.
Candace CrawfordBoard memberPresent (67 segments). Questioned the auditor on report turnaround and consequences; nominated as the board's audit representative; drafted and read the Acuity opposition letter.
Arlene HawkinsBoard memberPresent (65 segments). Moved the agenda correction to FY2020; nominated Crawford as audit representative; reported for the Policy Sub-Committee.
Bonnie MilesBoard memberPresent (49 segments). Moved to hire the SHS safety specialist and later withdrew the motion; seconded the donation and the Acuity letter. One of her last meetings — she did not stand again at the March 11 election.
Whitney SkillenBoard memberPresent (28 segments). Questioned the safety specialist's uniform, pay equity and grant funding; Policy Sub-Committee chair. Also leaving the board at the March 11 election. Distinct from Chair Heather Whitney — see the method note on attribution.
Michael PetrinBoard memberAbsent (per the minutes)
Noelle KronbergSchool Board ClerkTook the roll call; submitted the minutes. Addressed by the chair at 0:00:35 as "Noel Cronenberg" in the automatic transcript.
Miles SheehanStudent Board Member, Stevens High SchoolReported (36 segments) on music and theater and the loss of band rehearsal time; read his own written account of the February 11 lockdown.
Lilly ClarkStudent Board Member, Stevens High SchoolReported (23 segments) on winter athletics results; described the lockdown from inside her classroom and answered board questions on police presence, hall and phone policy.
Christopher PrattSuperintendentSuperintendent's report (114 segments); presented the 2025–26 calendar, the SALT donation and the SHS Safety Specialist proposal; announced the March 17 community safety forum and the new District Truancy Officer.
Mary HenryBusiness AdministratorPresent and speaking (27 segments); drew the policy/procedure distinction with the auditor and reported on the outstanding IRS matter.
Patrick O'HearnHuman Resource DirectorPresent and speaking (13 segments); accepted Sprague's point about start dates on job postings and answered on grant funding sources.
Michael CampoAuditor — partner in charge, Plodzik & Sanderson, P.A. (attending virtually)79 segments, 0:25:460:54:04. Presented FY2020 audit findings, the status of FY2021–FY2024, and a proposal for monthly audit-oversight meetings. The automatic transcript renders the firm as "Plastic and Sanderson," "Plasma and Sanders" and similar.
Scott BlewittYouthCan Prevention Coordinator, West Central Behavioral Health66 segments. Lead presenter of the 2023 Youth Risk Behavior Survey data (Exhibit A). Title as given in the agenda heading reproduced in the approved minutes.
Jennifer ("Jen") GallagherCitizens'/outside presenter — named in the minutes, no title given there45 segments on bullying, sexual harassment and dating-violence data and on Turning Points Network programs. The minutes name her as a presenter and record that she "shared about Turning Points initiatives" but give her no title; at the podium she self-identified with Turning Points Network and said "both Carrie and I are educators."
Kari HagueCitizens'/outside presenter — "Kari Hague from TLC" per the minutes; no title given there42 segments on TLC Family Resource Center services and the SHINE curriculum. Self-identified at the podium as "Kerry Rochford… the shine educator at Telsey [TLC]"; Blewitt introduced her as "Kerry Rochford. Hague, representing TLC and turning points." The minutes' "Kari Hague" and the podium's "Kerry Rochford" appear to be the same person; the project has not verified the full name.
Hannah BrooksCitizens'/outside presenter — named in the minutes, no title or affiliation given there19 segments on the Getting to Y program, LGBTQ+ drop-in groups and survey reliability. Self-identified at the podium: "I work at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical center slash greater Sullivan county public health network."

No members of the public spoke: the minutes record Citizens Comments as "None," and the chair's call at 0:01:54 — "Is there anyone present wishing to speak this evening on a non agenda item? Okay. Seeing none" — is answered by silence. The minutes' masthead lists SAU 6 central-office administration in full (Pratt, Koski, McCosker, Small, O'Hearn, Henry); that block appears on every set of minutes this year and is not an attendance record, so only administrators who actually speak are listed above.

Agenda

Agenda as reproduced in the approved minutes; the posted packet also contains CSB Agenda 3.5.25 (2).pdf. Items were taken out of order by leave of the chair, so "Taken up" is the moment each was actually reached. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped entry for full text.

Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:04I. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance (6:30 p.m.)"I'd like to call to order the March 5th, 2025 school board meetings to please rise to the Pledge of Allegiance."
0:00:35II. General Business — Secretary roll call (6:35 p.m.)Per the minutes — Present: Candace Crawford, Arlene Hawkins, Bonnie Miles, Whitney Skillen, Frank Sprague, Heather Whitney. Absent: Michael Petrin. The clerk reading the names is not captured by the automatic transcript.
0:00:45II.a. Consent Agenda (vote required) — agenda approval and minutes approvalWhitney: "We have an agenda for us, and I'm requesting the board's generosity and moving forward with the agenda as written and accepting the minutes from 2525. And I think that was 21525." Hawkins then amended the agenda: "The results of the 2021 of water [audit] that the woman received in… Our packet is FY 20." Whitney: "Then we'll accept that modification. To the agenda to read results of Fiscal year 2020 audits and update on 22 and 23. Yes, 2122 a lot of process… Consent agenda is approved." The minutes record the amendment as "Arlene Hawkins requested a read of the FY2020 audits and updates on other years," and record the minutes approved as "2.5.25 & 2.15.25."
0:01:54II.b. Citizens Comments (Policy BEDH)"Is there anyone present wishing to speak this evening on a non agenda item? Okay. Seeing none." Minutes: "None." Six days before the March 11 ballot, no member of the public addressed the board.
0:02:20II.c. Student Board Member Report — Miles Sheehan & Lilly ClarkWinter athletics results; the senior play, all-district band concert and guest conductor; Sheehan's request that band be made a double block — the minutes record the change from a year-long full block to a year-long full period as costing "about 96 hours of rehearsal time." Then both students' accounts of the February 11 lockdown and the adult reaction to it on social media, and answers to board and superintendent questions on police presence, the hall-wandering policy and the phone policy. Roughly 22 minutes.
0:25:04IV.1. Results of FY 2021 Audit and FY 2022, FY 2023 Audit Progress Update (Discussion) — Plodzik & Sanderson, P.A. (Virtual) — as amended, FY 2020Taken out of order so the students could leave: "Is there any objection to having Plasma and Sanders [Plodzik & Sanderson] give their presentation first?" Whitney framed it as "the fiscal year 20 audit and talk about where we're at with 21, 22, 23, 24." Campo presented FY2020 findings, answered board questions for about 25 minutes, and proposed a monthly audit-oversight meeting. Hawkins nominated Crawford as the board's representative; the minutes record Whitney Skillen seconding. No vote on the nomination is recorded in the minutes.
0:55:16IV.2. Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data Presentation (Discussion) — Exhibit A"Next on our agenda is youth risk behavior survey data presentation." Four presenters on the 2023 survey (66% response rate, 338 of 515 students): alcohol and marijuana trends down; prevention-message recall down from 73% in 2015 to 47.8%; harassment, dating-violence and sexual-behavior data; consent-asking up to 88% at Stevens. Roughly 48 minutes. Slides are packet Exhibit A.
1:44:54IV.4. Stevens High School S.A.L.T Program Donation from Jack & Dorothy Byrne $4000.00 (Vote) — Exhibit C"we had a donation of $4,000 to the Salt, which stands for student Athlete Leadership Team." Crawford moved ("So move"), seconded, voice vote: "All in favor of accepting the donation? Say I, I motion passes to accept the donation." Minutes: Crawford moved, Bonnie Miles seconded, all voting in favor.
1:46:31III. Superintendent's Report (6:40 p.m.)Monthly written report taken as read — budget pressure, Frontline Central rollout in HR, student services and school reports; the March 17 community safety forum "set up in a direct response to the lockdown gun incident we had that occurred at Stevens High School on February 11th"; a strategic-plan work session held that day; and the hiring of Scott Maple as District Truancy Officer (the transcript renders it "nutrition officer"). Board follow-ups: Crawford on the report's accessibility online, Sprague on the federal English-language executive order and on start dates in job postings, Whitney deferring an achievement-data deep dive to April 2 with the new board.
2:01:01IV.5. SHS Safety Specialist Proposal (Discussion) — Exhibit D — Chris Pratt"this is a direct response to what we know now based on the situation that took to the high school." Miles moved to hire; Crawford seconded. Discussion ran roughly 27 minutes on uniform, pay equity ($67,000 average against teacher and police pay), grant durability, camera monitoring and accountability. Whitney asked to table to April 2, after the March 17 community forum; Miles withdrew the motion — "I'm comfortable. With drawing. As long I know you're going to, it's going to be addressed." No vote taken. Proposal is packet Exhibit D, funded from Title IV.
2:34:12IV.3. 2025-2026 District School Year Calendar (Vote) — Exhibit B — Chris Pratt"the calendar this year, snow days are not built in, but this calendar stays within… the CBA. We have no moose [MOUs]." Sprague worked the hours arithmetic aloud against the state minimum standards; Miles asked whether the state sets a minimum number of days and was told "Hours, hours." Sprague moved to approve the calendar as presented, Whitney seconded; voice vote, all present in favor. Minutes add that the June meeting was permanently moved to the Tuesday before to avoid conflicts with high-school events.
2:37:47IV.6. Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center Sign (Discussion/Vote) — Heather Whitney, Chair"a proposal for me asking that we allocate, the amount of funds required to either purchase two signs for the front of this building and the back of the building with an arrow that goes to the door. So folks that come to meetings and hearings will not come to the front door, and it's locked and not know where to go." Crawford to ask whether the SRVRTC carpentry class could make them and report back. No funds were voted.
2:39:35IV.7. Citizens Comments Response Acuity Proposal (Discussion/Vote) — Exhibit E — Candace CrawfordCrawford read a drafted letter: "the school board stands in opposition to a proposal to bring a very large toxic waste sorting facility to Claremont, New Hampshire." Sprague moved to endorse it, Miles seconded; Crawford to read it at the March 6 state hearing. Whitney spoke and voted against: "I supported I'm in opposition… for me, it's a no." Voice vote at 2:42:49: "All in favor? Aye, aye. Opposed me." The approved minutes record "Voice vote taken, all present voting in favor."
2:43:47IV.8. Sub-Committees (Discussion)Report readouts suspended for time. Hawkins for Policy: "At the March 19th meeting, the board will be getting three policies that are prompted by Grant's audit. And so there will be two for updates. One asked to be rescinded." Finance Sub-Committee next meeting set for April 4; Capital Improvement, Curriculum and SRVRTC committees noted; Skillen asked that a student with an interest in law be recruited for tech support on Policy.
2:45:30V. Other Business (8:20 p.m.)Miles thanked Pratt for his statement on responding to any potential ICE visits to the schools, offered to donate her mother's piano to the music programs, and pressed the band-rehearsal question. Committee-interest emails requested; the board retreat deferred until new members are seated; Hawkins circulated a fair-funding petition emailed by "mayor Dale Gerard," noting "it's individual. It's not board."
2:48:54VI. Future Dates / Future Agenda Items (8:25 p.m.)"Our next. Claire Claremont school board meeting is the 19th." Minutes list: NH Listens Meet the CSB Candidates 3.4.25; Voting Day March 11, 2025; Community Public Discussion/School Safety 3.17.25 at the SHS Auditorium; CSB Meeting 3.19.25; School Board Retreat TBD. The chair and members then thanked Bonnie Miles and Whitney Skillen for their service; Skillen: "It's been such an honor."
2:51:39VII. Adjournment (8:30 p.m.)Sprague: "Make a motion to adjourn." Minutes: "Consent adjournment at 9:20pm." Respectfully submitted by Noelle Kronberg, School Board clerk.

Discussion timeline — audit testimony, the students' lockdown account, and the safety-specialist debate

Times are from the dialogue transcript (Output/Dialogue/16371 SchoolBoard030525.mp4.CSV). Quotations reproduce the automatic transcript as-is, including its garbles; corrections are in square brackets, and an ellipsis marks where turns by another speaker have been joined out.

TimeTopicWhat was said (leading text; hover/focus for more)Flags
0:01:15Hawkins corrects the agenda: the packet holds FY2020, not FY2021Hawkins: "The results of the 2021 of water [audit] that the woman received in… Our packet is FY 20." Whitney accepts on the spot: "Then we'll accept that modification. To the agenda to read results of Fiscal year 2020 audits and update on 22 and 23." The posted agenda item reads "Results of FY 2021 Audit and FY 2022, FY 2023 Audit Progress Update"; the document actually before the board was the FY2020 audit, and Campo's presentation confirms it.MEDIUM
0:07:20Students on the adult reaction to February 11Clark: "WMUR TV and what's up, Claremont? There were a bunch of adults saying that we shouldn't feel the way we felt because it was just a toy. And a lot of other comments like that. And one common [comment] in particular, a bunch of us students from Sanchez [Stevens] responded to and we put quite a few of them in the packet to show you how respectful and responsible and, well, soft [thought-out] we all made those comments."
0:08:35Sheehan reads his written account of the lockdown"I like many of the kids in that class. We all just thought it was a drill or fake, and we didn't really think anything of it until we saw the police pull into the front and, like, sprint to their trucks to put on their vests in. There are their ballistic shields." … "I could see through, like a tiny rip in the paper taped over the closet, window, the police sprinting up and down the hallways with their rifles in hand. I heard the stomping in the radios, and I had my classmates crying. And at that point, I figured it out that it was a real thing." … "Everyone in the community came together in those hours to keep us safe, and those hours afterwards to defend our experiences, despite the fact that we had to be defended at all."
0:12:15Clark answers the chair on police presenceClark: "we felt safe and comforted by it because there were so many people and it was like 20 against four, and they were all adults, and they just came so fast that we felt like, oh, we're we're gonna be fine. But the thing that really scared us and, some people in my class were, they came in and had their, guns pointed right at us." … "Because it's never like you're never prepared to be told to put your hands in the air with guns pointed at you." Hawkins: "No matter what age you are. You're never prepared for that." Later, at 0:15:25: "One of the kids got detained right outside my classroom door. We heard everything."
0:21:00What the students say would helpClark: "Doctor Harrington [Herrington] did put in a in place that if you wander the hallway, you're immediately sent home for the night… I also believe that we should think about the phone policy, because we wouldn't have known if someone at the tech center didn't see it online. But yet again, there's also pros and cons to that." Sheehan: "I don't think that there's much else that we can do. Honestly, I think that it's, it's at a spot where all we can do is tweak."
0:25:46Campo introduces himself and the engagement"I'm Mike Campo. I am the partner in charge of Plastic and Sanderson [Plodzik & Sanderson]. We are the firm performing the audit of Claremont, Unity and Sussex [SAU 6]. In total, we do about 230 audits on an annual basis. And the majority of them don't take multiple years to complete. So I think having this meeting is a good opportunity to kind of get everyone on the same page and, steer the ship in one direction here." … "When I became a partner… One of the first gifts I got was these three engagements. And it's been my life mission to get them caught up… One of the biggest challenges we've had is continuity of management over the years."MEDIUM
0:26:37"the boxes of completed audits were still sealed""We had some members of management in the past who were unreceptive, unavailable, or just flat out just weren't that interested in the audit. I won't name specific names. It's not good for anybody to name specific names, but anybody who's been on the board for a number of years know some of the challenges we've had. I can put it even to the point where at one point, working in the the Sussex [SAU 6] offices, I was a little frustrated to find when pulling records that the boxes of completed audits were still sealed in the this person's, cabinet." … "They obviously didn't make it to you because they were still sealed and, and had the box hadn't been opened." … "I did bring it to the assistant superintendents attention at that point. That person wasn't there much longer, but but still, the damage had been done because we were years behind."MEDIUM
0:28:37FY2020 finding: the general ledger was not maintained"It wasn't maintained. So what does that mean? Your balance sheet wasn't reconciled on a regular basis. I believe your current BA can attest to the fact that cash took a lot of time to get it back into balance for her current year that she's working on, her team worked very hard to do that. I don't know how a school district can operate if they don't know what they have in the bank." The recommendation: "the school district needs to adopt and policies and procedures to standardize the monthly reconciliation of your general ledger, which is your balance sheet, your profit and loss side."MEDIUM
0:29:23"those statements are misstated""Additionally, why that's important is if your balance sheet is wrong. Your profit and loss. When you're looking at budget to actual reports, those aren't accurate either, because every entry requires a debit and credit, so you need one on each side. So if you're missing one on the balance sheet, you're missing something on your profit and loss. So those statements are misstated." He is describing the FY2020 condition; he does not extend the word to any later year on this record.MEDIUM
0:29:43Journal entries and stale-dated checks"Part of the reason that we had issues is during [journal] entries were being recorded, at a very high rate. They weren't being approved, they weren't being reviewed. And often they lacked formal formal documentation to support them. So you'll see this as a comment in your 2020 report as well." On cash: "you at that point in time, had several outstanding checks that were what we would consider stale dated… They were six months or older. This creates a risk because that's often an area where if somebody is trying to do something wrong, steal data [stale-dated] checks are usually part of the default."MEDIUM
0:30:34No credit card policy; reimbursements without evidence of authorization"Red [Credit] card policy. The school district at the time did not have a credit card policy. Anybody any client I have… if they plan on using a government credit card, purchase card, whatever debit card, there should be very clear terms on how that should be used. It should include what the process is to make sure that your purchasing policy is being followed. That includes purchase orders. Where is the card kept when not in use?" … "what we noticed was that you had members of your staff who were purchasing items on their credit cards personally and then being reimbursed for it, which on the surface is a significant concern." … "The concern becomes that we did not find evidence that these purchases were authorized. So the school district was on the hook or felt they were on the hook to reimburse these people for items that honestly, you didn't know if you had the budget available for, if it was appropriate."MEDIUM
0:32:41"You guys set the tone at the top""I'm a big proponent of you, as the school board should be reviewing your financial policies, all of them over a three years… The reason for that is you guys have three year terms. You guys set the tone at the top as the governing body of how the school district is supposed to perform. So I believe that a rotation of having every policy put in front of the board members requires them to understand what the policies are. It also gives you a chance to evaluate. Are they still working? Are they appropriate?"
0:33:41Sprague: were the FY2020 problems fixed by FY2021?Sprague: "there are things that weren't happening in the 20. Have they been taken care of in the 21?" Campo: "Some have been addressed, but some have not. The problem is with a lot of the order [older] findings were giving them, were giving them like two years after the fact. And that has a lot to do with the fact that our ability to go in, we can't just go into your office and then conduct the audit. We need the assistance of management." … "A big issue we've had is just finding records in a lot of cases, because the people who were there before and stored the records are no longer there." … "the people we spoke to about these issues are no longer there."MEDIUM
0:35:43Crawford: "the report is dated July 21st, 2023. This is March of 25"Crawford: "First of all, the report is dated July 21st, 2023. This is March of 25… we got the report for the 2020 audit in 23. And now it's taken us almost a year and three quarters to actually get that report." Campo: "the 23 date is when that would have been shipped to you… We don't need two years to ship a report. So we the date we issue it is the day that we get the sign management representation letter… We then nail [mail] hard copies and actually right away when we released a report we'll send a PDF copy as well. And that goes to management. We from management side we can't control when it's district." Crawford later: "I really look forward to your plan for following up, because if we're at 2020 audit and this is March of 25, I really am anxious to hear what your plan is."MEDIUM
0:38:14Who has oversight; lenders and the federal governmentCampo: "We don't have a oversight. However, the Department of Education gets your reports. They would have authority oversight." … "Our job as the independent auditor is to basically render an opinion on whether or not the financial statements can be relied upon by users of the financial statements… we're not necessarily crying [trying] to render opinion on your internal controls. However, if we detect areas of concern, we have an obligation to communicate that to the users of financial statements, management and governance." Crawford asked whether a lender would balk at adverse findings; Campo: "Absolutely. That is a legitimate concern you have." And at 0:39:25: "I would also extend that to the federal government as well. You you, as a school district, receive a substantial amount of federal funds being displayed on audits needs to be corrected. That's a legitimate concern."MEDIUM
0:45:04Campo's proposal: a monthly meeting with a designated board member"I want to get these caught up. I have to explain to my partners at the office why these aren't caught up… which I would like to propose is that the board delegate one individual to do a monthly meeting with myself and your business administrator to do an update on where we stand on these audits, any issues that we're having, anything like that. And then that way we you're being held accountable, held accountable, and management is being held accountable… I think we need something formalized and we need to start moving forward." He set the first meeting for "Tuesday the 18th because that would be after the field work," and warned: "You're either going to love me or hate me because I'm very persistent."POSITIVE
0:49:15Crawford nominated as the board's audit representativeHawkins: "And I nominate Candace Crawford to be on board." The next voice on the recording says "I second" and the dialogue file attributes it to Heather Whitney; the approved minutes record "Arlene Hawkins nominated Candace Crawford to be the representative, Whitney Skillen seconded the motion." The minutes govern. Neither record shows a vote being taken on the nomination. Hawkins also asked about the SAU audit; Campo: "I'm looking to do all three. I want all three caught up and ready to go."POSITIVE
0:50:46An IRS/ACA matter outside the auditor's purviewSprague: "there are some things in there that really are not within plot centers [Plodzik & Sanderson's], if I'm saying it correctly, purview that are a concern, one being, an issue with the IRS that's mentioned in there… it was, as Middleton used to say, top of the fold issue around the IRS and the ACA compliance." Henry: "I know right now that is being handled. We've got Patrick involved with it as well. We also have our attorneys involved in it to get that taken care of. It's taking more time. Number one, it's response time, not just from the IRS, is hard to get to somebody to get it taken care of." … "That is something that we inherited and went, oh, great. You know, I mean, we got a letter."MEDIUM
0:53:21Campo on the current administration"in terms of the the administration you have now, they've been very cooperative… honestly, we just we just had to let a, another client go. They were 18 months behind, and they just didn't care about the price… when management doesn't care about it, we walk away from that… I'm nowhere near that point with your management. And honestly, I do talk to your b a [BA] on a fairly regular basis, at least monthly checking in… I do feel very optimistic with the team you have in there that they're going to help us achieve what we want to do here." Sprague, twice: "this predates this administration." Henry: "We do care. Believe this. This is driving me crazy because I don't have numbers and I can't stand having numbers."
0:59:17YRBS: who presented, and what the 2023 data coversBlewitt: "So my name is Scott Blewitt… I brought my partners in prevention with me. Kerry Rochford. Hague, representing TLC and turning points. Double duty Jen Gallagher, familiar face… And Hannah Brooks." On the lag: "We were here last year when we were here last year. We were talking about the 2021 data… And then they did another survey in 2023… And then the CDC takes their time to analyze it." On YouthCan: "we are a division of West Central Behavioral Health where a DFC grant. We have a budget of $125,000 a year. Specifically for Newport and Claremont, the Can is an acronym for Claremont and Newport."
1:01:44Alcohol and marijuana trends"this is 2023, 15.8% of Stevens ninth through 12th graders, had an alcoholic drink at least one day during the last 30 days" — against 32.9% in 2013. "Claremont Pride. You're doing a great job. And there is a decrease. Is 15% too high. Of course it is." Marijuana 30-day use 17.6%, six points lower than a decade earlier; both measures higher among seniors than freshmen and, in these years, higher among female than male respondents.
1:07:21"one more statistic that concerns me the most""This is about perception. The percentage students who recall hearing, reading or seeing a public message about avoiding alcohol or other illegal drugs during the past 12 months, and currently, it is 47.8% of the students recall seeing something which is a little bit less than half. And you might think that's pretty good. But if you look ten years ago or even 2015, it was 73%. So to me, that means that I need to do a better job working with partners to get the message out there." Sprague: "My suspicion is that kids are getting their information differently now" than they were a decade ago — "Social media. They weren't watching. Right TV, right."
1:09:41Gallagher on harassment and dating violence"Turning Points Network serves all of Sullivan County, and we help folks with relationship abuse. So if people are experiencing stalking, sex trafficking, sexual harassment, sexual abuse, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, bullying, right?" On the data: "the good news is that Stephens [Stevens] is lower than both the region and the state. The last [less] great news is that it's 15%, which I would say is pretty high." And at 1:12:13: "the first question looked at the percent of students who were ever physically forced to have sexual intercourse when they didn't want to. A Stephens was actually higher there than both the region and the state, which is concerning. 13% of students reported that they were forced to have intercourse when they did not want to." Mental-health support: Stevens performed "not quite as well as the state or the region."
1:16:12Hague on TLC and the SHINE curriculum; consent data"I'm Kerry Rochford, and I am the shine educator at Telsey [TLC]" and, in the segments that follow, "And also a prevention educator" working with Gallagher at Turning Points. On SHINE: "it's an inclusive curriculum. It's developmentally appropriate. It's medically accurate information for young people." At 1:24:46: "the percentage of students who verbally asked for consent the last time they had sexual contact, right. For Stephens, 88%. The county 84, the state 77… we're really encouraged to think that because there is more intentional curriculum around consent used by both turning points and TLC, that we're seeing that positive upward trend." Gallagher noted for viewers at home: "Age of consent in New Hampshire is 16, not 13."
1:26:02Brooks on Getting to Y and survey reliability"I work at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical center slash greater Sullivan county public health network. And I do a lot of partnering with these folks as well… focuses mostly on youth engagement and a lot of LGBTQ plus support in our community." On Getting to Y: "we really put the data in the hands of youth and say, you're the ones that are taking this. This is also yours to have. What can we do about it? It's very much a student led initiative. Not my decision as an adult." She invited board members to a spring data-analysis retreat. Earlier, on Crawford's question about response bias, Brooks offered a handout on the reliability and validity of the survey. Blewitt closed with the response rate at 1:38:01: "it was 66%, and it was 338 out of 515 students," and noted the survey runs on an opt-out rather than opt-in basis.
1:44:54$4,000 SALT donation acceptedPratt: "we had a donation of $4,000 to the Salt, which stands for student Athlete Leadership Team… Salt club is such as, trips, community service projects, the NFL flag program at Stevens High School." Crawford: "So move." Whitney: "Miss Crawford makes a motion to accept $4,000 from the, Jack and Dorothy Byrne Foundation for the Salt program… All in favor of accepting the donation? Say I, I motion passes to accept the donation."POSITIVE
1:49:18The March 17 safety forum announcedPratt: "This forum will serve as a platform for community members to discuss safety concerns, share insight, and collaborate on initiatives aimed at enhancing the safety and well-being of our students and staff. This forum was set up in a direct response to the lockdown gun incident we had that occurred at Stevens High School on February 11th, and we encourage all board members to attend." He added it would have "a panel of administrators, our school SRO and the police chief there, will be presenting."
1:53:20Sprague on the federal English-language executive order"I was looking at the one that designated, English as the language of the United States. And as I read through that, it looks as if that executive order suspends a Clinton era requirement that schools provide services for non-English speaking students." Pratt: "there's a lot going on at the federal level that does trickle down to the states… right now we're just in the waiting game." Sprague: "I worry about the not not doing the programing but the, the funding that would come along with that from various sources." Separately, O'Hearn accepted Sprague's point on job postings: "I think that's good advice. And I can tweak our job postings to reflect start dates."
2:01:01SHS Safety Specialist proposalPratt: "this is a direct response to what we know now based on the situation that took to the high school… I've never been in a high school or middle school with more than 300 kids that didn't have our own individual employee to overlook" the safety of the building. On funding: "I've checked with grants. The money is there. Some of these grants are set up specifically for things like this." On the February 11 sequence: "these particular students were in the hallway for over 40 minutes… as most of you saw, there's not too many people in the halls in between classes." Miles moved to hire; Crawford seconded.OBSERVATION
2:09:37Whitney on the salary and the qualification"We're looking at an average salary of 67,000 a year for an individual who has a high school diploma or an equivalency, and our teachers aren't starting there, and our chief of police makes only $7,000 more, and our police officers make 52,000, and they work 12 hour shifts in every other weekend. So I had some concerns about the disparity of the salary as it relates to the position." Sprague: "isn't this the equivalent of 1012 [10 to 12] years of experience for a teacher to get up to 70,000 is near the top of the state. That's 20 years." … "I think it's way too much money. Chris."OBSERVATION
2:16:35Accountability, and who watches the camerasWhitney: "Say this individual creates a safety plan and it's below state standards. Are they accountable for that? … Who's ultimately held accountable? Is it still the principal or the superintendent?" Pratt: "Ultimately it's the superintendent… as guards, [as regards] the safety plans. They're not creating them. They're making sure they're being followed." Then at 2:21:18 — Whitney: "So nobody monitors the camera in the hallway during passing hours?" O'Hearn: "Nope." Pratt: "The only time the cameras are looked at is if an incident takes place. You go back and we review them, and we try to figure out what happened."OBSERVATION
2:22:17Whether to build a position on grant moneySprague: "it's grant funded this year, but with everything that's going on, the uncertainty of title money, anything coming from the federal government, I think is. I don't I don't dare to count on it." Skillen echoed the concern and asked what else had been considered. Hawkins asked whether the post could be advertised as grant funded. Pratt: "Here would be like title for [Title IV] title for right now. We know we're not maximizing the grants," and O'Hearn confirmed it would not come out of Title I.OBSERVATION
2:28:18Tabled to April 2; the motion withdrawnWhitney: "a lot of the things that we would like to talk about are really not appropriate to talk about, because we're talking about physicians [positions] and people… That's a nonpublic." … "we haven't been able to talk about and haven't really had a real forensic analysis of what perhaps, administrators in the building felt, kind of getting feedback from the teachers. And if we could hear that, and I think it would be helpful for me to be supportive of this position, in the context of, like, a larger plan." … "If we had this meeting on April 2nd, it would be after the community safety meeting. We would hear what the community said. We would hear what the police chief Wilmot said." Sprague: "It makes it a response instead of a reaction." Miles withdrew the motion at 2:32:51: "I'm comfortable. With drawing. As long I know you're going to, it's going to be addressed." Crawford asked that any revived posting require a four-year degree.OBSERVATION
2:34:122025–26 calendar: no snow days built inPratt: "the calendar this year, snow days are not built in, but this calendar stays within… the CBA. We have no moose [MOUs]. It is what it is. Is nothing more. Nothing less than what's in the CBA." Sprague worked it aloud: "if you take them, do the math and you do 172 days and they're in school for six hours a day, you come up with a number. And the difference between the two numbers at six hours a day is how many snow days you don't have to make up. Am I close?" and "according to the minimum standards, it was, I believe 994 or 9995 school, 1964 elementary" — the figures are garbled by the transcript. Miles: "there's no state requirement for minimum number or number of school days… Does the state identify number of school days." Pratt: "Hours, hours?" Sprague: "You can choose." Sprague moved approval; Whitney seconded; voice vote in favor.OBSERVATION
2:40:08The Acuity opposition letter, and a split the minutes do not showCrawford read the letter: "the school board stands in opposition to a proposal to bring a very large toxic waste sorting facility to Claremont, New Hampshire. We take this position because of our concerns for the children of Claremont. While the proposal states that truck traffic will be on the outskirts of Claremont, there are no provisions for monitoring this activity effectively." … "The proposed facility would be located close to the Maple Avenue Elementary School and the neighborhood houses where children live." … "I know we don't take political positions. However, this is an advocacy for our children." Sprague moved to endorse; Miles seconded. Whitney at 2:42:25: "I supported I'm in opposition. Just because I feel very strongly about not engaging in municipal matters, I don't have enough knowledge, quite frankly, to know if this is truly factual… So for me, it's a no," and "I know I'm a minority, so, you know, I'm good with being a minority." Then the vote: "All in favor? Aye, aye. Opposed me."MEDIUM
2:43:47Policy sub-committee: three policies driven by the auditHawkins: "Are we okay with suspending our report readouts? Can I just quickly on policy subcommittee because we had a meeting today. At the March 19th meeting, the board will be getting three policies that are prompted by Grant's audit. And so there will be two for updates. One asked to be rescinded. And the the proposed revisions will be in the board packet." She asked members to read them in advance and send comments to the chair "for expediency."POSITIVE
2:48:54Last meeting for Miles and SkillenWhitney: "Our next. Claire Claremont school board meeting is the 19th. And I want to, with a very, very full and grateful heart. Thank both of you for all your contributions and caring." Skillen: "It has been. It's been it's been such an honor. I feel like I've learned so much and I've gained such a different perspective… I feel like I'm just in a season of my life where I don't have enough time to be a school board member, but I hope one day I'm going to be like, Arlene." Miles: "I'll be back." Neither stood at the March 11 election.

Items flagged for review

Flags are a reviewer's aid generated by comparing the record against current state and federal law. They are not findings of violation, and nothing here is legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; where no verified rule applies, the item is labelled an observation.

MEDIUM The approved minutes record the Acuity vote as unanimous; the recording captures the chair voting against it

On agenda item IV.7 the board voted to endorse a letter opposing the proposed Acuity construction-and-demolition facility. The approved minutes state: "Heather Whitney spoke in opposition, because she believes strongly that the Board should not take a political stance and has not researched this enough, but she understands that she is the minority," and then, "Voice vote taken, all present voting in favor." Those two sentences cannot both be right. On the recording Whitney says at 2:42:25 "So for me, it's a no," and when she puts the question at 2:42:49 the transcript captures "All in favor? Aye, aye. Opposed me." The Right-to-Know Law requires minutes to record "a brief description of the subject matter discussed and final decisions." A resident reading only the minutes would take a contested endorsement for a unanimous one, and would not know that the chair — who was also presiding — was the dissenting vote. The mover (Sprague) and seconder (Miles) are correctly recorded, and no roll call was required for this item.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (minutes: subject matter discussed and final decisions); Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25 (item IV.7); recording at 2:42:49.

MEDIUM FY2020 audit findings: general ledger not maintained, journal entries unapproved, no credit card policy, reimbursements with no evidence of authorization

Campo laid out the FY2020 conditions in his own words, and this page reports them as he stated them rather than as a conclusion about any later year. The general ledger "wasn't maintained," so "your balance sheet wasn't reconciled on a regular basis" and, in consequence, "when you're looking at budget to actual reports, those aren't accurate either… So those statements are misstated." Journal entries "were being recorded, at a very high rate. They weren't being approved, they weren't being reviewed. And often they lacked formal formal documentation to support them." Several outstanding checks were stale-dated at six months or older, which he identified as a fraud-risk area. The district had no credit card policy, and on staff reimbursements: "we did not find evidence that these purchases were authorized." Asked whether FY2021 fixed these, he answered "Some have been addressed, but some have not." Independent audits of school districts are conducted under RSA 21-J:19; for the portion of activity supported by federal awards, 2 CFR 200.303 requires the district to establish and maintain effective internal control, and 2 CFR 200.318 sets documented procurement standards to which a purchasing and purchase-order process of the kind Campo described is directed. Also raised and unresolved at this meeting: an IRS matter concerning Affordable Care Act compliance, which the business administrator said the district "inherited" and was working through with counsel.

Sources: RSA 21-J:19 (audits by independent public accountants); 2 CFR 200.303 (internal control over federal awards); 2 CFR 200.318 (procurement standards); recording 0:28:370:32:41; Approved minutes 3.5.25 (item IV.1).

MEDIUM Five fiscal years behind: FY2020 findings first read to the board on March 5, 2025, six days before the budget ballot

The chronology established on the record is precise. The FY2020 audit report is dated July 21, 2023 (Crawford: "This is March of 25"). Campo confirmed the issue date is the shipping date — "We don't need two years to ship a report" — and that delivery onward from management is outside his control; separately he described finding, at the SAU offices, that "the boxes of completed audits were still sealed" in a cabinet and so "obviously didn't make it to you." As of this meeting the firm was still in fieldwork on FY2021, with FY2022, FY2023 and FY2024 outstanding, and the chair framed the discussion as "the fiscal year 20 audit and talk about where we're at with 21, 22, 23, 24." The agenda itself was wrong about which year was in the packet and had to be amended on the floor. Six days later, at the second session of the district meeting under RSA 40:13 on March 11, 2025, voters passed the FY26 operating budget of $42,933,564 by 614–408 — with the four most recent fiscal years unaudited. (That ballot result is the official March 11 return, not part of this meeting's record; it is noted here once because the audit status the board heard on March 5 was the last such account before the vote.) Why this is a MEDIUM and not a HIGH: New Hampshire law in force in 2025 imposed no fixed deadline for completing a school district's annual audit that this record shows to have been missed, and the record before the board does not state the district's federal expenditure levels for FY2020–FY2024. If the district expended $750,000 or more in federal awards in any of those years, that year's single audit and reporting package were due to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of thirty days after receipt of the auditor's report or nine months after the audit period ended — a deadline the FY2020 cycle alone missed by more than two years. Campo told the board the district receives "a substantial amount of federal funds," and that the Department of Education "gets your reports. They would have authority oversight." Confirming the expenditure figures would move this to a HIGH; on this record they are unconfirmed.

Sources: RSA 21-J:19; 2 CFR 200.501 (single audit threshold); 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1) (submission deadline); RSA 189:28 (reports to NHED; aid withheld until complete and accurate information is submitted); RSA 40:13 (second session, March 11, 2025).

OBSERVATION The consent agenda approved minutes for a February 15, 2025 meeting that has no record anywhere else

The approved minutes record the consent item as "Minutes Approval- 2.5.25 & 2.15.25," and the chair on the recording says at 0:00:45 "accepting the minutes from 2525. And I think that was 21525." Two things about that date do not line up. There is no February 15, 2025 meeting of this board anywhere in the project's meeting map — no Cablecast recording, no packet folder, no separate minutes document in the district's 2025 or 2026 minutes shares. And the February 5 minutes had already been approved by consent at the February 19 meeting, whose own minutes were the obvious candidate for approval here. This page does not resolve which reading is right — a meeting whose minutes exist nowhere else, or a transposition of "2.19.25." It is recorded because RSA 91-A:2 makes minutes the public's record of what a body did, and a consent approval that cannot be matched to a meeting leaves that record incomplete either way.

Sources: Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25 (item II.a); Approved CSB meeting minutes 2.19.25; RSA 91-A:2 (minutes; five business days); MAP.md (no February 15, 2025 meeting listed).

OBSERVATION A grant-funded safety position proposed, debated for 27 minutes, and withdrawn without a vote

The superintendent brought a Stevens High School Safety Specialist proposal (packet Exhibit D, "Title IV") as "a direct response" to February 11, telling the board "I've checked with grants. The money is there." Miles moved to hire; Crawford seconded. The board raised four distinct objections and resolved none of them by vote: pay equity (Whitney — "an average salary of 67,000 a year for an individual who has a high school diploma or an equivalency, and our teachers aren't starting there"; Sprague — "I think it's way too much money"); the durability of federal grant money (Sprague — "I don't I don't dare to count on it"); what accountability the post would actually carry (Pratt — "Ultimately it's the superintendent"); and the fact that hallway cameras are reviewed only after an incident ("Nope," to the question whether anyone monitors them during passing time). Whitney also said a full discussion "would be talking about positions and people within that are currently employees here," which "is a nonpublic," and asked for a "forensic analysis" of the February 11 response before deciding. Miles then withdrew her motion so the item could return on April 2, after the March 17 community safety forum. No vote was taken, and the position remained unfilled at this date. There is no rule on this project's verified list that governs the timing of a discretionary staffing decision, so this is an observation; the record is noted because it is the board's most substantive response to the lockdown in the pre-election period, and because the grant-funding question Sprague raised is a recurring one in this district's later record.

Sources: Exhibit D — School Safety Specialist Proposal (Title IV); Approved minutes 3.5.25 (item IV.5); recording 2:01:012:32:51; RSA 91-A:3, II(a)/(c) (the exemptions the chair invoked as the reason to defer).

OBSERVATION 2025–26 calendar adopted with no snow days built in, and the state minimum checked from memory on the floor

The calendar was presented as containing no built-in snow days because, for the first time in some years, it sits inside the collective bargaining agreement with no memoranda of understanding — "It is what it is. Is nothing more. Nothing less than what's in the CBA." Sprague then tried to satisfy himself that the calendar clears the state minimum by doing the arithmetic aloud, and quoted the standard from memory in figures the transcript garbles ("994 or 9995 school, 1964 elementary"). Miles asked directly whether the state sets a minimum number of days; the answer from the superintendent was "Hours, hours," and from Sprague, "You can choose." That exchange is substantively right — the state minimum standards for school approval express the instructional year in days with hourly equivalents, and a district may satisfy the requirement either way — but no exhibit or figure from the rule was put in front of the board, and the calendar was approved on a voice vote immediately after. The packet's Exhibit B is the calendar itself; nothing in the packet documents the hours calculation. Adopting a calendar with no weather cushion places the burden of any cancellation on the make-up provisions of the collective bargaining agreement, a point the superintendent acknowledged: "we couldn't build in the snow days because of the way the contract language is."

Sources: N.H. Admin. R. Ed 306.15 (instructional year: days and hourly equivalents), within Ed 306 minimum standards; RSA ch. 273-A (public employee collective bargaining); Exhibit B — draft 24-25 Claremont School Year Calendar (1).pdf — the Drive file is named for 24-25 although the item voted was the 2025-2026 calendar; the file name is the district's.

POSITIVE A standing audit-oversight channel created at the auditor's own request

Campo asked the board to do something it had not been doing: "delegate one individual to do a monthly meeting with myself and your business administrator to do an update on where we stand on these audits… And then that way we you're being held accountable, held accountable, and management is being held accountable." The board acted the same night — Hawkins nominated Crawford, and a date was fixed on the spot for the first meeting ("Tuesday the 18th because that would be after the field work"), with Henry to circulate email addresses. Campo also committed to bringing Claremont, Unity and SAU 6 current together: "I'm looking to do all three." Two further pieces of the same pattern appear later in the meeting: Hawkins reported that three policies "prompted by Grant's audit" would come to the board's March 19 packet, one of them for rescission; and the board asked its business administrator and the auditor to involve it in the procedure-writing that sits beneath board policy, which Campo endorsed — "they're responsible for the financial statements. They should have an understanding of what the process is behind it, behind them." Two records caveats belong with this flag: the minutes record the nomination as seconded by Whitney Skillen while the dialogue file attributes the "I second" to Chair Heather Whitney (the minutes govern), and neither record shows a vote actually taken on the nomination.

Sources: RSA 21-J:19; Approved minutes 3.5.25 (item IV.1; Sub-Committees); recording 0:45:04 and 0:49:15.

POSITIVE Private donation accepted by named motion and public vote, with the supporting document in the packet

The $4,000 Jack and Dorothy Byrne Foundation donation to the Stevens High School Student Athlete Leadership Team was described on the record, moved by Crawford, seconded by Miles per the minutes, and carried by voice vote in open session, with the donation letter posted in advance as packet Exhibit C. Unanticipated money from a private source is accepted under RSA 198:20-b; the prior public hearing with seven days' published notice that statute requires attaches at $20,000 or more, so no hearing was owed at $4,000 — but the board still took the acceptance as a distinct, named, publicly voted item rather than folding it into a consent list. That is the practice a reader auditing a donation trail later would want to find.

Sources: RSA 198:20-b (acceptance of unanticipated funds; $20,000 hearing threshold); Exhibit C — Jack and Dorothy Byrnes Foundation Donation; Approved minutes 3.5.25 (item IV.4).

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Packet documents (exact Drive names)

Project files (relative links work when this page is opened from Output/HTML/)

Laws and rules cited on this page